So. Open and frequent threats of punching (as we've seen now carried out in Auckland against elderly woman), boot-stomping, smashing women's teeth in for talking, multiple threats of rape and sexual assault
and constant abusive sexual references, multiple examples of "Kill terfs" slogans, threats of decapitation, now threats of acid attacks. This is #terrorism in the form of serious #VAWG and threatening femicide.
It is extremely notable that most of this is what violent misogynist and male supremacists have always done to women who speak out or in other ways "don't know their place".
And no, I don't care if some simpering women suck up to male supremacists who want to subjugate them, they do not fucking speak for me or consent for me. Still doesn't make me a "fascist" or anything like it. These masked activists are the fascists.
This violence, which is clearly targeted primarily at women and at dismantling women's rights, is being continually enabled by politicians, organisations and media outlets in the UK as well as, as we've seen, in many countries elsewhere, and it's one of the reasons
it has now escalated to the frightening levels we are seeing, still, it seems, with the blessing of some politicians. It has been allowed to, even encouraged to. This level of hatred is not "equality" and it's not "human rights". It's violent anti woman authoritarianism
and it's terrorism. As a reminder, the women they call "TERFS" are of ALL political persuasions, huge numbers from the left and liberal left (as the RF would tell you, if you knew anything about it), and a TERF is literally ANY woman who wants to retain single sex spaces,
stands up for her current legal rights, thinks there should be a discussion about it, knows biology is real and matters in her life. Unlike her accusers, she doesn't believe in their regressively sexist genderwoo or rank lesbophobia of the pomo gender fundamentalist religion,
understands how facts and legislation work and believes in fundamental human rights for all including the fundamental rights of freedom of belief, freedom of expression, freedom of association, which include us ALL.
They use the word "TERF" to demonise and dehumanise, create an "other" to dementedly hate and to excuse violent abuse. The women they are threatening are not "fascists", many have long histories of social activism.
WHY isn't this violence (and there have been years of it, although they're really escalating now) being stopped? Because it's being enabled.
Genuine civil rights movements don't prevent people who were historically subjugated from talking about their own rights, threaten them with death, rape, stomping and throwing acid at them. Wake the fuck up.
"The worse it looks — the more obvious it becomes that these are just men, shouting at women, threatening them, abusing them, same as always — the more necessary it becomes to dig in your heels, to insist that the targets are real witches, this time."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Gender zealot: Not everyone fits into gender norms you bigot! Without us, everyone would be forced to.
GC Feminist: No, we know they don't. That's why we never believed in rigid pink and blue sex stereotypes and why feminists have campaigned against them for over 70 years, &-
Gender zealot (waving conservative pink and blue sex stereotype flag): Bigot! Fascist! TERF! Conservative Christian! Smash the binary!
GC Feminist: Erm, we already did. You've recreated it and sent us back over half a century & now you're promoting actual violence against women.
Gender zealot: Silence TERF! (posts gun pointing cartoon)
GC Feminist: But don't you think-
Gender zealot: Shut up Karen! Kill all terfs! Kill, kill, kill! Be kind! Kill! Punch her face in! Execute the witch! Waaah!
It seems that there are people, including supposed "investigators into VAWG" that think VAWG is completely acceptable, even morally righteous, when enacted on women who don't have what they assume is their own political purity or who might speak to or even be in the vicinity of
someone they deem 'unclean'. I'm not really sure what is hard to 'get' about this. It's not about "right and left." It's about right and wrong and not enabling and excusing violence against women, regardless of their political views or others' claims about political affiliations
(which are more often than not hyperbolic and invented). Who decides which VAWG is okay and who isn't? Do you have a sort of Purity Pope figure or something issuing decrees on which women it's acceptable for men to threaten to rape, kill, throw acid at, stomp and punch?
It strikes me how fucking clueless a lot of TRA academics (I use the term loosely) including women are about who the women who disagree with them are and what we actually believe. I just read a whole piece by a woman who proudly terf-blocks and thinks we're all evil and stupid
and parochial, and yet I didn't recognise the views of the women she was describing at all as anything like my own. They're not those of most of the "terfs" I know. She's sort of magicked up this evil witch-person that she's railing against.
I'm sure she imagines she's being really, really clever, but she's got a very narrow minded view of who she's actually dealing with and what their views and understanding is. So narrow minded - and she's a beautiful writer but - tbh, it just came across as a bit dim.
Oh yeah. And to anyone who is still "both sidesing" this, STOP enabling and emboldening what is now nothing but violently misogynist anti-woman terrorism. Women protesting are NOT saying anything like what these violent men are saying quite openly,
and no, saying the word "NO" to men (or even calling literal men men)is not even remotely the equivalent of threatening to kill, punch, rape, stomp on, hold a knife to the throat of, shooting or decapitating. I do not care if you find someone pointing out reality upsetting.
Reality is not hate. Threatening to murder and rape people for saying no to you is more than bloody upsetting, it's terrorising people, yet women who are currently expected to put up with it if they don't comply with TRA terrorist demands.
I've probably posted my thread of images of transactivists openly calling for the murder, beating, & sexual assault of women about twenty or more times by now. They use words like "killing, stomping, punching, dead" frequently, & sexual stuff. Not ONCE have I heard a single TRA,
or any of their influential allies in government or the media, condemn the violent rhetoric. I've seen praise of what happened in Auckland though. I've seen "congratulations" defamations of any and all women involved and sentiments of "she/they deserved it."
I've also seen the several instances (not posted by feminist women, by male observers ) where they came across the actual behaviour of TRAs they saw and recorded how the police were clearly prioritising the activists and enabling them, failing to protect anyone else.
I think legal action should be taken against ALL of these men who are defaming women and inciting misogynistic hatred against them. The TRAs have for some time been OPENLY calling for women thus designated to be killed, raped, beaten, abused - even beheaded.
(And no a woman saying no to you or wanting to discuss her CURRENT LEGAL RIGHTS or question a sexist, bullshit ideology that the EVIDENCE shows is deeply flawed is not "genocide" or the equivalent to literal calls for killing, beating and rape so stop pretending it is.)
Any man, particularly one of influence, like, I don't know, singers, journalists, politicians, who is cheering this on or targeting particular women in this way, is helping to incite real world violence with their false and hateful claims. It needs to stop.