A thread of reflections on today's documents as I and the rest of #energytwitter pour through them. /1
The first is on heat decarbonisation, where the headline is that Government will extend the Boiler Upgrade Scheme until 2028. No details on how it'll be paid for though. But it presents a puzzle. /2
The BUS was meant to be a stopgap until the Government's market mechanism starts in 2024. This compels boiler suppliers to provide a certain percentage of their sales as heat pumps, effectively forcing them to cover heat pump costs to get consumers over the line. /3
The Government, unheralded, has consulted on this Clean Heat Market Mechanism today too, setting targets in line with its 600k heat pumps/year by 2028 ambition. /4
This means that the BUS is now a de facto subsidy for boiler manufacturers. Amazing that DESNZ didn't mention that. /5
Not being done with heat - the trajectory implied by the CHMM consultation indicates a de facto ban on new gas boilers by 2032. Chart below extrapolates the trajectory in the consultation until it hits the current annual boiler sales of 1.8M/year. /6
GOOD GRIEF. The Government has slipped out a commitment to full electrification of heat in the Heat Pump Accelerator document. It is very difficult to foresee any role for 100% hydrogen heat if no boilers can be installed, which a 1.9m target implies. /7
My very rough maths indicates that this is equivalent to a reduction in usage of the UK's gas network of between 13-20% by 2035. /8
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Yesterday the ESO held a T-4 capacity market auction. This collection of syllables means that the people who run the power system competitively issued 15-year contracts to power plants to keep the lights on. There's an interesting angle to this, which I will explore. /1
The auction procured 43GW of generation at £63/kw, the highest ever price. This means that the market expects the available generation on the system to be very low in four year's time. /2
The market is not wrong; the nukes coming offline means we do face a potentially very tight period during the middle of the decade. The capacity market is meant to fix this exact problem. How has it done that? /3
The first is the rather unsurprising news that the UK Government doesn't have the firepower to do anything equivalent to the US's Inflation Reduction Act, and instead will pin its hopes on a mix of sector-specific plans plus regulatory changes. /2
This is at least a welcome dose of reality; post Brexit and with no longer any real pretence to even belong to an economic hegemon, our route to success must be specialisation. /3
My view is that the creation of a Department for Energy Security (DES, or the Department for Desmonds as I shall call it from hereon in) is very probably a good thing. Let me set out why. /1 bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politi…
Firstly, there's a lot of affection for the erstwhile Department for Energy and Climate Change from former staff; it was a heavily mission-focused department and working there felt very different to the rest of the Civil Service. /2
But affection isn't enough to justify a machinery of Government (MOG) change. I have a lot of sympathy with @guynewey's view here; MOG changes are resource intensive and soak up departmental resources. /3
Just seen this remarkable paper that was published at the start of Jan. It contains a finding of great interest to my fellow energy geeks: than demand reduction from energy efficiency doesn't last. /1 cam.ac.uk/research/news/…
Very quickly, measures like cavity wall insulation do cut gas demand, but within four years of treatment overall gas demand is back up to its original level. So what's going on, and what does this mean for policy? /2
There's an important clue in one of the paper's findings: gas demand goes back up more quickly in less well-off homes as compared to the homes of the rich. /3
The collapse of British Volt is an excellent opportunity to summarise some of the lessons I've learned from working with a range of British energy entrepreneurs. /1 thetimes.co.uk/article/inside…
There's a view from some entrepreneurs that the British Government is somehow a softer touch for capital than private markets. That if you can just get a word in the right person's ear, finance will flow. /2
Under the Johnson administration this was true for headline figures like the BV financing, but such monies are issued wrapped in Treasury rules and regulations. And rightly so; taxpayers' money should not be frittered away on the pals of Ministers. /3
Quoted in the FT today talking about the actual need for gas storage. My worry is that paying for natural gas storage now - rather than looking to build hydrogen storage - we'll tie up capital for assets we'll only use this decade. /1 ft.com/content/d4e9b2…
There's always the temptation for politicians to fight the last war, and the biggest challenge of the energy war was this winter. Winter 23 might be difficult, but we'll see further demand destruction this year while having more import infrastructure available. /2
Additional storage could play a role in price arbitrage, but as the article says, Centrica hasn't been able to recover the costs of restarting Rough even with this year's volatility. /3