Mirror mirror on the wall
Who's the wokest of them all?
The UK Govt & its Ministers are hypocrites when it comes to upholding their own stated "fundamental British values" which they, & swathes of the UK press, ignore & contradict through their policies & rhetoric. 🇬🇧
In 2014, the Govt published its "Guidance on promoting British Values" in schools - values codified in official guidance on "improving the spiritual, moral, social & cultural development of pupils to ensure young people leave school prepared for life in modern Britain."
The official "guidance" compels schools to "actively promote" the "fundamental British values of democracy, *the rule of law*, individual liberty, & *mutual respect & tolerance of those of different faiths & beliefs*", which #Ofsted must take into account during inspections. 🤔
So how does the rhetoric of Govt Ministers, along with swathes of the UK's press & broadcast news media, align with the "fundamental British values" of "mutual respect & tolerance of those of different beliefs"?
SPOILER ALERT: it doesn't.
Does this mean they're anti-British? 🇬🇧
The Govt's plan is "to ensure children become valuable & fully rounded members of society, who TREAT OTHERS WITH RESPECT & TOLERANCE, regardless of background".
Ministers & right-wing news media do not consider a growing list of 'others' worthy of either respect, or tolerance.
Examples of the understanding & knowledge pupils MUST learn include: "an acceptance that people having DIFFERENT BELIEFS to oneself ("which is protected in law") SHOULD BE ACCEPTED & TOLERATED, & should NOT be the cause of PREJUDICIAL or DISCRIMINATORY behaviour".
Other examples of the understanding & knowledge of "fundamental British values" pupils MUST learn include: "an understanding of the importance of identifying & COMBATTING DISCRIMINATION" - although actively promoting & justifying discrimination appears fine IF you're the UK Govt.
So how does all this fit with 'wokeness'?
It's clear that the Government, the billionaire-owned or funded right-wing news media, including GB "News", & TalkTV are all explicitly 'anti-woke' - but what do *they* actually mean when they mobilise 'woke' & 'wokeness' as pejoratives?
Used as a pejorative, according to the Right 'woke' has THREE main attributes & meanings that they take exception to:
(1) imposed conformity to a particular ideology;
(2) over-sensitivity to particular cultural issues (eg race);
(3) intolerance of opposing ideologies.
Govt Ministers, the right-wing media & others on the right all agree these three components are antithetical to 'free speech' & the "fundamental British values" of "individual liberty, & mutual respect & tolerance of those of different beliefs". Fine. It's a view I'll tolerate.😉
But the Right's OWN intolerant rhetoric conforms PRECISELY to what THEY find objectionable in THEIR understanding of the term 'woke': imposed conformity to a particular ideology; over-sensitivity to particular cultural issues (eg wokeness); & intolerance of opposing ideologies.
But which intolerance came first?
The 'overly sensitive Left', who want to impose conformity to eg tolerating & respecting asylum seekers & minorities?
Or the 'overly sensitive Right', who want to impose conformity to eg demonising & scapegoating asylum seekers & minorities?
We appear to be locked into a very harmful, divisive, & polarising 'intolerance spiral', which is not just antithetical to the Govt's own stated "fundamental British values", but is also threatening the very fabric of society, & democracy itself.
And most MPs don't seem to care.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There was outrage when in 2020, the Tory Govt conceded a new bill to amend the UK's Brexit deal would "break international law" in a "specific & limited way".
But what is international law? What is the ICC?
And what were Margaret Thatcher's views on international law?
First, what is 'international law'?
Broadly (it's complicated!) it refers to the body of legal rules, norms, and standards that apply between sovereign states and other entities that are legally recognized as international actors.
The term was coined by the English philosopher Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832). According to Bentham’s classic definition, international law is a collection of rules governing relations between states. This original definition omits individuals and international organizations.
"Improving the quality of life for people of this country is perhaps the most important duty of Government."
John Prescott has died.
In September 2000, John - then Deputy Prime Minister - gave a speech at the @UKLabour Party Conference, introducing Nelson Mandela.
Nelson Mandela died in December 2013. Writing a tribute in the Daily Mirror, John reflected on his death, writing: “In my office at home I have a picture that is my most treasured possession. It’s of me shaking Nelson Mandela’s hand on stage at the @UKLabour conference in 2000."
At the Rivonia Trial, between 1963 & 1964, Mandela gave a dramatic speech from the dock.
John wrote in 2013 “When I read that, I knew that I wanted to enter politics. He was my inspiration. So when he walked free in 1990, we felt as if one of our own comrades had been freed.”
🧵
Allison Pearson posted then deleted disinformation, falsely accused three people of being "Jew haters", lied about where the photo was taken & what they were doing, then lied about what the Police said to her - and then moaned about being a victim! FFS
The Telegraph's divisive shit-stirrer Pearson falsely claimed she was told by the police who came to her home it was over a “non-crime hate incident”. Her lie was then dutifully amplified by every Reform UK MP & billionaire-owned right-wing "news" media, painting her as a victim.
Essex Police said “At no stage... was she informed that the report being investigated was being treated as a non-crime hate incident. To suggest otherwise is wholly inaccurate and misleading.”
Pearson, Farage, Musk, Young, Habib, & many other shit-stirrers who shamelessly try to normalize hateful, divisive, provocative & inflammatory rhetoric, often refer to George Orwell's 1984, but Aldous Huxley's Brave New World is much closer to the dystopia we inhabit...
Harassment, malicious communications, incitement, & threatening violence are all crimes in the UK, & have been for a long time.
Print & broadcast media, & online social media are simply platforms on which we behave or misbehave: it's not about the medium, it's about the offence.
The UK is signed up to Article 10 of the #ECHR: everyone has the right to free speech, which may only be qualified in limited circumstances, including: national security; public safety; the protection of morals & of the reputation or rights of others.
"Enoch Powell was a hero of the young Nigel, but at this point he could do without any association with the politician who made the notorious Rivers of Blood speech... the accusation of racism follows Farage & his party around like a bad smell." - Allison Pearson
"Farage has tried for years to shrug off the charge that his parties are more than “the BNP in blazers”... although I don’t think Farage is a racist, it’s a problem that racists attach themselves to Reform." - Allison Pearson
“We’re investigating a report which was passed to us by another force. The report relates to a social media post which was subsequently removed. An investigation is now being carried out under section 17 of the Public Order Act.” - Essex police spokesman
Not a lot of people know that Oxbridge alumni Fiona Bruce, presenter of 'Fake or (paid a) Fortune?', and since January 2019, the @BBC's interrupting Chair of #bbcqt, was born in Singapore.
One of her first episodes as Chair was the one that made Laurence Fox a household name.
In my widely read & reported February 2023 Open Letter to the @BBC about @bbcquestiontime, one of my concerns was about Bruce’s chairing of #bbcqt which I said was "at best, unacceptably poor."