Nicholas Drummond Profile picture
Apr 11 12 tweets 4 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
The US Army’s Next Generation Squad Weapon (NGSW) program has been controversial. Few people expected SIG to win with what many perceived to be an evolutionary approach. The smart money was on Textron and its innovative cased-telescoped ammunition and weapon technology.
1/12
What made NGSW controversial is that US Army wanted a bullet that could defeat Level IV body armour at 600 metres. This resulted in an ammunition that matches .300 Winchester Magnum, a long-range sniping cartridge. (7.62 mm versus .300 WINMAG)
2/12
The NGSW competition was about how to package a US Government-furnished 6.8 mm EPR-style projectile in the smallest possible cartridge and weapon system. Three companies were down-selected GD-OTS, SIG Sauer, and Textron.
3/12
SIG was the surprise winner not only because its weapons performed best, but equally because its ammunition solution was so innovative. It developed a hybrid cartridge that combined a legacy brass case with a steel base able to cope with the extra pressure.
4/12
While SIG's hybrid 6.8x51 mm NGSW cartridge delivered exactly what the US Army asked for, it was not without certain disadvantages. At 22 grams (versus 24 grams for legacy 7.62 mm NATO) the marginal weight saving does little to reduce the infantry soldier's weight burden.
5/12
Another concern is weapon recoil. See linked video shows at 3:36). Weapons with increased chamber pressure that run hotter also have increased barrel and parts wear. SIG is working to address these issues.
6/12
Recognising the limitations imposed on it by the uS Army's exacting NGSW requirement, SIG had the foresight to develop hybrid ammunition in other calibres. Notably, it developed a hybrid version of the 6.5x48 mm Creedmoor.
7/12
Initially, SIG's hybrid 6.5x 48 mm Creedmoor round was only available with a commercial OTM bullet weighing 123 grains / 8 g. More recently, it has been tested with a 102 grains / 6.6 g EPR style bullet. This has MV of 890 m/s from a 14.5" barrel and weighs less than 16 g.
8/12
Another new development is @FN_America's 6.5x43 mm Lightweight Intermediate Caliber Cartridge (LICC). This also uses a hybrid cartridge design fired at higher pressure, but similarly delivers Level IV body armour defeat at ranges of circa 400 metres.
9/12
What is clear from 6.8 mm NGSW, 6.5 mm Creedmoor hybrid, and 6.5 mm LICC is that higher pressure cartridges are the future of military small arms. The question is how much extra pressure is desirable?
10/12
I am hoping that the positive test results achieved with both the hybrid 6.5 mm Creedmoor and 6.5 mm LICC will encourage the US Army to review the NGSW calibre and specifications. (Image: @soldiersystems).
11/12
A slightly smaller bullet size than 6.8 mm can potentially deliver the US Army's desired range and penetration requirements in a package with less recoil and less weight. This is exactly what is needed to drive the wider adoption of NGSW among NATO members.
12/12-END

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nicholas Drummond

Nicholas Drummond Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @nicholadrummond

Mar 17
The UK’s purchase of Archer may seem illogical to some, but is actually a clever solution with multiple benefits.
1️⃣ AS90 is no longer fit for purpose. The Army desperately needs a 52 calibre howitzer and it cannot wait for MFP to deliver in 3-5 years time. For the UK to lead the Very High Readiness Joint Task Force, it must have credible tube artillery now.
2️⃣ Archer was available immediately
3️⃣ Archer was not expensive.
4️⃣ If Archer is not chosen for the MFP requirement subsequently, it will likely be easy to sell on to another customer.
Read 11 tweets
Mar 14
A few thoughts about #IR23 and its implications for the forthcoming Defence Command Paper. 🧵

IR21 was prescient and correct in identifying Russia and China as the two major threats. Russia was always the more immediate challenge due to its proximity, and IR23 reflects this.
1/ Image
IR21 recognised that resource constraints meant that our approach to the Indo-Pacific needed to be a "tilt" not an outright "pivot." The AUKUS construct is the perfect embodiment of this aspiration, especially as the threat posed by China is expanding not contracting.
2/ Image
The duality of Euro-Atlantic and Asia-Pacific roles means that seven Astute Class submarines is insufficient. In fact, many would argue that seven submarines is not even enough for Euro-Atlantic commitments. In other words, the UK's SSN fleet may need to grow.
3/ Image
Read 21 tweets
Jan 30
These five armies all have one thing in common: they're using the same camouflage pattern uniforms. This makes it hard to distinguish between them. Not a good look. Is Crye Precision / MTP really so good that nothing else will do? Or are our armed forces just fashion victims?
Why is this a problem?
You need to be able to tell your own forces apart from those of the enemy. If the enemy is wearing the same uniform as you and is indistinguishable, there’s a risk of friendly fire fire incidents, blue-on-blue, as they’re called.
1/
In Ukraine, we’ve seen both sides wearing armbands to show who they are, which shows that force ID is an issue. But if you need to wear a bright blue and yellow armband, it defeats the purpose of having a camouflage uniform.
2/
Read 11 tweets
Jan 25
Ukraine says it needs 300 tanks to replace losses and conduct “combined arms manoeuvre.” This is the modern equivalent of Blitzkrieg and describes a tactical approach through which tanks and infantry supported by artillery and air power retake lost ground.
1/
NATO and its partners could potentially provide five different tanks types:
1️⃣ M1A1 / M1A2 Abrams
2️⃣ Leopard 2 A4 / A5 / A6
3️⃣ Challenger 2
4️⃣ Leclerc
5️⃣ K2 Black Panther
All are equally capable and quantifiably better than anything the Russians have fielded in Ukraine.
2/
The US Abrams is highly capable and sophisticated. But its gas turbine engine is thirsty (even though newer models have an auxiliary power unit). It’s more difficult and expensive to support,but also more difficult to maintain and this may be its Achilles heel.
3/
Read 13 tweets
Jan 21
To clear-up the misunderstanding about Germany issuing "licences" for the export of tanks. This is not a German thing. Every NATO country that exports military weapons requires customers to have an END USER CERTIFICATE that confirms they are ultimate user of the capability.
Why? To stop weapons ending-up in the wrong hands. For example, the electronics in upgraded T-72s come from a French company that didn't require an end user certificate, or licence. Their products should never have been exported to Russia. So, yes, end user certificates matter.
Over the years, we have seen South American and African regimes somehow mange to obtain weapons that they should not have been allowed to receive. If we do not control arms traffic, then convicts will become more likely.
Read 4 tweets
Jan 20
Much of the criticism levelled at Germany is justified. Merkel’s coziness with Putin meant that she failed to see the threat he posed or the risks of Nordstream 2. And Scholz has been slow to accept the reality of the situation Germany now finds itself in. But…
1/
Germany answered the wake-up call months ago and is fully on board with need to support Ukraine by providing military aid. In fact, only the USA and Britain have donated more. But it hasn’t been any easy journey or transformation. And it’s important to understand why.
2/
Prior to reunification, East Germans, unlike West Germans, perceived Russia as an ally. It’s only since Feb 2022 that they have seen Putin for what he really is: a heartless dictator bent on recreating the Soviet Union. So Germany’s world view has had to radically realign.
3/
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(