That the "Democracy-Dies-in-Darkness™" WashPost now does the job of the US Security State by hunting down its leakers and doing everything to expose their identity really says everything about the real function and ideology of these media corporations.
Recall that the WPost did the same thing with Edward @Snowden. They gleefully used part of the archive he obtained, published those docs, praised themselves for the Pulitzer they co-won, and then. . . .
This then-Huff-Post reporter, @ryanjreilly, has devoted his life to doing the FBI's work, hunting anyone associated with 1/6. He swooned when AG Garland praised "#SeditionHunters" for their service. For it, he got promoted to NBC. This is state media:
They work hand-in-hand with @bellingcat, funded by the US and EU: just like the "disinformation experts" whom they cite and prop up.
The uproar over NPR and BBC getting a "state-funded" Twitter label is because all these media outlets function as state media for these agencies.
All that said, I continue to be skeptical about the motives behind this leak. For all the talk about how devastating and destabilizing it is for the US: how?
The NYT today touts how the docs show Russian "infighting" and how they can't win the war.
As we review and report the docs on @SystemUpdate_, we're posting them here. They're all over the internet. Media has them. Especially for those in the public interest - showing deep US involvement in the war in Ukraine - the public should, too:
We still don't know who leaked the draft Dobbs ruling because that went to a liberal corporate outlet. (POLITICO).
We still haven't seen the manifesto of the Nashville shooter because it's inconvenient.
But this leak was put on Discord, so media outlets are hunting for him.
A big part of what's driving this:
Many corporate media employees most hate those who do what they pretend to do: expose the secret crimes and lies of the US Security State. Those agencies are their allies and masters.
That's why they're hunting to find the leaker instead.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Every time an important leaker emerges -- not an authorized one (i.e., CIA/FBI feeds the NYT or NBC) but one that's *unauthorized* (exposing their lies) -- the establishment playbook is the same: malign the personal character of the leaker to distract:👇
This is a perfect example of what my above article describes. Here's the US/EU-funded @bellingcat -- who helped the NYT do the FBI's job of catching the leaker -- insisting you obsess on the leaker's motives and character, not what the documents reveal:
I can barely put into words how dangerous and twisted it is that it is now the NYT and WashPost that does the FBI's job for it by hunting down leakers of classified information -- the people on whom real journalism depends -- working in tandem with state-funded Bellingcat:
Look how Democratic Party media personalities -- in both this tweet and the replies that follow -- are treating as normal, *celebrating*, that it's now major media corporations that do the FBI's work.
Here are Washington Post and New York Times reporters celebrating themselves and all the cool things they did when doing the FBI's job of tracking down leakers and exposing their identity to ensure they are arrested:
This story was published by the NYT 12 hours ago. Numerous top editors who oversaw publication of our reporting -- then-Guardian-editor-in-chief @janinegibson and Intercept's @MargotWilliams -- quickly corrected them, but the paper ignored it, still has these errors up:
Of course all journalists and outlets make minor errors but these are major. No journalist has any business writing about the Snowden reporting if they believe WikiLeaks published it. That's just massive ignorance that made it through all their editors.
Corporate journalists went to the Pentagon today to angrily demand they find ways to clamp down on secrets and ensure that no more leaks can happen. One specifically demanded they monitor Discord.
Congrats to the "journalists" for getting less transparency and more monitoring:
It is indescribably shocking and sickening that the nation's two largest media outlets were the ones who did the FBI's work and hunted for the leaker and outed him.
But what they did at the Pentagon was only slightly less gross. Listen to our montage:
I cannot think of any event that shines more compelling and vivid light on the real function of the largest media corporations than how they helped find the leaker and demand the FBI arrest him.
Perfect illustration of how scumbag reporters lie:
This BBC hack claimed he's seen more hate on Twitter. When asked, he can't name a single example because he hasn't look. Then claims @ISDglobal -- funded by US, EU and neoliberal billionaires - said it:
After getting caught red-handed repeatedly lying, this BBC reporter finally pretends he has no view, is just repeating the claims of @ISDglobal that maligns Twitter as being more hateful.
The US, EU, Big Tech and the same small handful of neoliberal billionaires (Gates, Omidyar, Soros) fund "disinformation experts" to smear any sites they can't control, or won't censor on command, as being vectors of hate and disinformation.
The WPost urges the Biden DOJ to find and punish the leaker. It's always bizarre to watch journalistic outlets urge the state to imprison leakers, especially ones whose motto is "Democracy Dies in Darkness"™, all while admitting the docs reveal little:
As we reviewed last night, this is a very odd leak. The papers that carry the message of the intel agencies - NYT, WPost, NBC - keep saying how dangerous this leak is, but these docs are banal, not revealing much if anything that wasn't previously known.
We analyzed some of the key documents for last night's show. These are not even close to the most sensitive docs. One of the few interesting revelations is Biden put Special Forces in Ukraine: something already assumed and that the public should know: