Lea Alhilali, MD Profile picture
Apr 13, 2023 19 tweets 8 min read Read on X
1/Is trying to understand peripheral nerve injury getting on your last nerve? Is the brachial plexus breaking you?

Here’s a #tweetorial to help you understand, recognize & remember the classification of peripheral nerve injuries
#medtwitter #meded #FOAMed #neurorad #neurotwitter Image
2/Normally the peripheral nerve is protected by surrounding myelin & connective tissue.

Think of the nerve like a hot dog. It is wrapped nice & cozy: first, by toppings right up against the hot dog (myelin) & then a bun holding it all in (connective tissue) Image
3/Although nerve injury can be compressive or stretch or even from radiation, it is easiest to think of it like a punch to the face. Imaging that sort of injury hits the nerve, like a fist to your face Image
4/Type of injury you get depends on how hard you were hit.

At its mildest, a punch gives you a bruise or black eye. This is the mildest nerve injury, neuropraxia.

Myelin is injured, so you get a conductive deficit, but it heals—just like you’ll eventually open that eye again Image
5/If the hit is harder, you don’t just get soft tissue injury, you break a bone. This is degree of nerve injury is called axonotmesis

The axon is disrupted, but the connective tissue is intact. So it can regenerate, like a fracture forms callus to fill the defect Image
6/Finally, the hardest hit is decapitation. This is the most severe injury—neurotmesis--axon & connective tissue are both disrupted.

Nerve is essentially severed. Like decapitation, the nerve can’t recover from this. Although, unlike decapitation, surgery can help this injury Image
7/This is the Seddon classification of injury.

But it’s missing something—bc it groups all nerve “fractures” or axonotmesis as the same.

But not all fractures are equal. There’s a big difference between a nasal fx & a LeFort. Sunderland classification makes this distinction Image
8/Sunderland classification divides the nerve “fractures” into different severities—depending on how much of the axon/connective tissue is disrupted

Sunderland class 2/3 are like mild fx’s that can heal on their own, while class 4 are the facial smash fractures that need surgery Image
9/Think of the connective tissue like scaffolding—if it's intact, nerve can use the scaffolding to rebuild

If only the axon is injured, scaffold is intact & it’ll heal

If only endoneurium is disrupted, there’s enough to rebuild

But only having perineurium is often not enough Image
10/How do these injuries look on imaging?

Think of the nerve like a vessel.

Nerves deliver information to muscles the way your carotids deliver blood/oxygen to your brain.

Muscles are the end organ for nerves the way your brain is the end organ for your carotid Image
11/How much damage you do the nerve is like how much stenosis there is in the carotid.

The worse the stenosis, the more likely you are to have a stroke.

Similarly, the worse the nerve injury, the more likely you are to have denervation changes in the muscle Image
12/Class 1 or nerve bruise is like mild calcified plaque you see in the carotid everyday. It does mean there’s been endothelial injury, but it’s not severe enough to cause any stroke.

So the nerve is bright on imaging from the injury, but the muscle is normal Image
13/Here is an example of a Class 1 injury—this is a patient with right jaw paresthesias after a right mandibular tooth extraction. You can see that the right inferior alveolar nerve is bright compared to the left—but no muscle signal Image
14/Class 2/3 or mild nerve fracture is like a dissection. Part of the wall is disrupted like a dissection, but part is intact

Vessel is often enlarged in dissection. Nerve is too enlarged

Also, dissections throw emboli causing end organ damage—so have muscle signal here too Image
15/Here’s an example of class 2/3 injury. Nerves of the brachial plexus are enlarged, like a vessel w/a false lumen added to it, but there’s no discontinuity.

You can’t see the difference between axon & endoneurium disruption on imaging, so they’re grouped together Image
16/In class 4 injury (serious fx) only perineurium remains.

It’s like a contained nerve rupture—like a pseudoaneurysm is like a contained vessel rupture. So it’s focally enlarged (neuroma) like a vessel is focally enlarged at a pseudoaneurysm Image
17/Class 5 injury is nerve decapitation—it’s like thrombosis of an artery, nothing gets through

And just like how thrombosis is associated w/stroke, these injuries have muscle denervation.

But unlike real decapitation, some of these injuries may be amenable to microsurgery Image
18/Here is an example of class 5 injury. Nerves of the brachial plexus are focally disrupted, and there is fluid in the gap, just like how there would be thrombus in the gap of a thrombosed vessel or squirting blood in the gap of a decapitated head 😳 Image
19/So now you understand the pathology behind peripheral nerve injuries, how they are classified, and how to recognize them on imaging

Hopefully, now you can approach these injuries without being nervous! Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lea Alhilali, MD

Lea Alhilali, MD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @teachplaygrub

Jun 27
1/Blast from the past!

Sometimes to be next gen, you gotta to go old school!

Cutting edge pituitary imaging must be MRI, right?

Or can we go back to the future w/CT?

Here’s the latest in pituitary imaging in this month’s @theAJNR SCANtastic!

ajnr.org/content/45/6/7…
Image
2/Pituitary imaging is actually very difficult.

First challenge is the small size of the gland & even smaller adenomas, requiring high resolution.

And the difference between adenomas & the gland is subtle—both enhance, but adenomas enhance SLIGHTLY less Image
3/The difference in enhancement is transient & ends quickly

So pituitary imaging must be done dynamically to catch this small window of difference

So we have to do very high resolution imaging very quickly—the worst of both worlds! Image
Read 12 tweets
Jun 21
1/”I LOVE spinal cord syndromes!” is a phrase that has NEVER, EVER been said by anyone.

Do you become paralyzed when you see cord signal abnormality?

Never fear—here is a thread on all the incomplete spinal cord syndromes to get you moving again! Image
2/Spinal cord anatomy can be complex.

On imaging, we can see the ant & post nerve roots.

We can also see the gray & white matter.

Hidden w/in the white matter, however, are numerous efferent & afferent tracts—enough to make your head spin. Image
3/Lucky for you, for the incomplete cord syndromes, all you need to know is gray matter & 3 main tracts

Anterolaterally, spinothalamic tract (pain & temp). Posteriorly, dorsal columns (vibration, proprioception, & light touch), & next to it, corticospinal tracts—providing motor Image
Read 20 tweets
Jun 19
1/”Tell me where it hurts.”

How back pain radiates can tell you where the lesion is—if you know where to look!

Remembering lumbar radicular pain distributions can be back breaking work--but here's a thread to help you! Image
2/Let’s start with L1.

L1 radiates to the groin.

I remember that b/c the number 1 is, well, um…phallic.

So the phallic number 1 radiates to the groin. Image
3/Let’s skip to L3 for a second.

I remember L3 is to the knee—easy, it rhymes! Image
Read 8 tweets
Jun 10
1/Do you know all the aspects of, well, ASPECTS?

Many know the anterior circulation stroke system—but posterior circulation (pc) ASPECTS is often left behind

25% of infarcts are posterior circulation

Do you know pc-ASPECTS?!

Here’s a thread to help you remember pc-ASPECTS Image
2/Many know anterior circulation ASPECTS.

It uses a 10-point scoring system to semi-quantitation the amount of the MCA territory infarcted on non-contrast head CT

If you need a review: here’s my thread on ASPECTS:
Image
3/But it’s only useful for the anterior circulation.

Posterior circulation accounts for ~25% of infarcts

Even w/recanalization, many of these pts do poorly bc of the extent of already infarcted tissue

So there’s a need to quantitate the amount of infarcted tissue in these pts Image
Read 8 tweets
May 29
1/Waving the white flag when it comes to white matter anatomy?

Turns out white matter anatomy isn’t black & white!

This months @theAJNR SCANtastic is the white knight you need to rescue you!

Here’s the white matter anatomy you NEED to know!

ajnr.org/content/45/5/5…
Image
2/Gray matter or cortical functional anatomy is well known.

Everyone knows the motor & sensory strips. Most know Broca’s & Wernicke’s

But most forget that white matter has similar functional topography & just bc it’s white matter doesn’t mean it doesn’t have function! Image
3/But too often we don’t refer to this white matter functional anatomy.

Instead we use general terms like “corona radiata”

But that’s the equivalent of using the word “body.”

Just like the body has many different systems in it, so does the corona radiata! Image
Read 12 tweets
May 21
1/Having trouble remembering what you should look for in vascular dementia on imaging?

Almost everyone worked up for dementia has infarcts. Which ones are important?

Here’s a thread on the key findings in vascular dementia! Image
2/Vascular cognitive impairment, or its most serious form, vascular dementia, used to be called multi-infarct dementia.

It was thought dementia directly resulted from brain volume loss from infarcts, w/the thought that 50-100cc of infarcted related volume loss caused dementia Image
3/But that’s now outdated. We now know vascular dementia results from diverse pathologies that all share a common vascular origin.

It’s possible to lose little volume from infarct & still result in dementia.

So if infarcts are common—which contribute to vascular dementia? Image
Read 21 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(