Lea Alhilali, MD Profile picture
Apr 13, 2023 19 tweets 8 min read Read on X
1/Is trying to understand peripheral nerve injury getting on your last nerve? Is the brachial plexus breaking you?

Here’s a #tweetorial to help you understand, recognize & remember the classification of peripheral nerve injuries
#medtwitter #meded #FOAMed #neurorad #neurotwitter Image
2/Normally the peripheral nerve is protected by surrounding myelin & connective tissue.

Think of the nerve like a hot dog. It is wrapped nice & cozy: first, by toppings right up against the hot dog (myelin) & then a bun holding it all in (connective tissue) Image
3/Although nerve injury can be compressive or stretch or even from radiation, it is easiest to think of it like a punch to the face. Imaging that sort of injury hits the nerve, like a fist to your face Image
4/Type of injury you get depends on how hard you were hit.

At its mildest, a punch gives you a bruise or black eye. This is the mildest nerve injury, neuropraxia.

Myelin is injured, so you get a conductive deficit, but it heals—just like you’ll eventually open that eye again Image
5/If the hit is harder, you don’t just get soft tissue injury, you break a bone. This is degree of nerve injury is called axonotmesis

The axon is disrupted, but the connective tissue is intact. So it can regenerate, like a fracture forms callus to fill the defect Image
6/Finally, the hardest hit is decapitation. This is the most severe injury—neurotmesis--axon & connective tissue are both disrupted.

Nerve is essentially severed. Like decapitation, the nerve can’t recover from this. Although, unlike decapitation, surgery can help this injury Image
7/This is the Seddon classification of injury.

But it’s missing something—bc it groups all nerve “fractures” or axonotmesis as the same.

But not all fractures are equal. There’s a big difference between a nasal fx & a LeFort. Sunderland classification makes this distinction Image
8/Sunderland classification divides the nerve “fractures” into different severities—depending on how much of the axon/connective tissue is disrupted

Sunderland class 2/3 are like mild fx’s that can heal on their own, while class 4 are the facial smash fractures that need surgery Image
9/Think of the connective tissue like scaffolding—if it's intact, nerve can use the scaffolding to rebuild

If only the axon is injured, scaffold is intact & it’ll heal

If only endoneurium is disrupted, there’s enough to rebuild

But only having perineurium is often not enough Image
10/How do these injuries look on imaging?

Think of the nerve like a vessel.

Nerves deliver information to muscles the way your carotids deliver blood/oxygen to your brain.

Muscles are the end organ for nerves the way your brain is the end organ for your carotid Image
11/How much damage you do the nerve is like how much stenosis there is in the carotid.

The worse the stenosis, the more likely you are to have a stroke.

Similarly, the worse the nerve injury, the more likely you are to have denervation changes in the muscle Image
12/Class 1 or nerve bruise is like mild calcified plaque you see in the carotid everyday. It does mean there’s been endothelial injury, but it’s not severe enough to cause any stroke.

So the nerve is bright on imaging from the injury, but the muscle is normal Image
13/Here is an example of a Class 1 injury—this is a patient with right jaw paresthesias after a right mandibular tooth extraction. You can see that the right inferior alveolar nerve is bright compared to the left—but no muscle signal Image
14/Class 2/3 or mild nerve fracture is like a dissection. Part of the wall is disrupted like a dissection, but part is intact

Vessel is often enlarged in dissection. Nerve is too enlarged

Also, dissections throw emboli causing end organ damage—so have muscle signal here too Image
15/Here’s an example of class 2/3 injury. Nerves of the brachial plexus are enlarged, like a vessel w/a false lumen added to it, but there’s no discontinuity.

You can’t see the difference between axon & endoneurium disruption on imaging, so they’re grouped together Image
16/In class 4 injury (serious fx) only perineurium remains.

It’s like a contained nerve rupture—like a pseudoaneurysm is like a contained vessel rupture. So it’s focally enlarged (neuroma) like a vessel is focally enlarged at a pseudoaneurysm Image
17/Class 5 injury is nerve decapitation—it’s like thrombosis of an artery, nothing gets through

And just like how thrombosis is associated w/stroke, these injuries have muscle denervation.

But unlike real decapitation, some of these injuries may be amenable to microsurgery Image
18/Here is an example of class 5 injury. Nerves of the brachial plexus are focally disrupted, and there is fluid in the gap, just like how there would be thrombus in the gap of a thrombosed vessel or squirting blood in the gap of a decapitated head 😳 Image
19/So now you understand the pathology behind peripheral nerve injuries, how they are classified, and how to recognize them on imaging

Hopefully, now you can approach these injuries without being nervous! Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lea Alhilali, MD

Lea Alhilali, MD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @teachplaygrub

Apr 16
1/ Need a global perspective on dementia?

Do you know the global cortical atrophy (GCA) score for evaluating dementia patients—or are you still gestalting volume loss???

Don’t estimate when you can calculate!

Here’s a thread of what you need to know about the GCA score! Image
2/The global cortical atrophy score calculates cortical volume loss on a scale of 0-3 in 13 different regions & ventricular dilatation

Gyri shrink down w/atrophy, the same way your cheeks shrink down with aging! Image
3/Gyri look like lips with around a mouth of sulcal space.

Without volume loss, the gyri look like big fat pursed model lips

But w/volume loss they open up like the scream w/thinning of the lips Image
Read 9 tweets
Apr 14
1/Wish that your knowledge of autoimmune encephalitis was automatic?

Do you feel in limbo about limbic encephalitis?

Do you know the patterns?

Read on for what you need to know in this month's @RadioGraphics review!



@cookyscan1 @RadG_Editor doi.org/10.1148/rg.240…Image
@RadioGraphics @cookyscan1 @RadG_Editor 2/Two pearls:
(1) Most common pattern is limbic encephalitis
(2) Small cell can cause any autoimmune pattern.

You can remember the causes by the demographic:
Young man: testicular
Older: Small cell
Woman with psychiatric symptoms (limbic): breast Image
@RadioGraphics @cookyscan1 @RadG_Editor 3/Limbic encephalitis is the most common pattern

But it has many, many different causes

Remember--limbic involvement is shaped like a question mark!

So for limbic encephalitis, the cause remains a question bc differential is so broad

Must question & clinically correlate! Image
Read 8 tweets
Apr 2
1/One important aspect to stroke care is well, ASPECTS.

It’s a simple score system—but it’s important to understand all aspects!

Read on for the latest research on ASPECTS in this month’s @theAJNR SCANtastic!

ajnr.org/content/46/3/5…Image
2/ASPECTS stands for “Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score.”

It’s meant to replace gestalt-ing what percent of the MCA territory is infarcted.

Instead, it uses a 10-pt score to semi-quantitate the infarcted tissue in the MCA territory on non-contrast head CT Image
3/You can think of it as a score card for the MCA.

For each region of MCA territory NOT infarcted, the pt gets one point—for a highest score of 10, and lowest score of 0 Image
Read 18 tweets
Mar 21
1/Don't fall for the siren song of calling all bright round objects at foramen of Monro colloid cysts.

Like a true siren song, this may be a TRAP!

If you hear the call of colloid—read this first!

Here's a thread about lesions here that can trap you--& how you can avoid them! Image
2/Here are 3 lesions, all round and bright and in the region of the foramen of Monro.

Can you tell from the images which is a colloid cyst and which may be something else?

Choose which one or ones you think are a colloid cyst! Image
3/In this case it was A!

B was a tortuous basilar

C was a cavernoma of the chiasm/hypothalamus that had bled and projected into the third ventricle. Image
Read 12 tweets
Mar 16
1/Remembering spinal fracture classifications is back breaking work!

A thread to review the scoring system for thoracic & lumbar fractures—“TLICS” to the cool kids! Image
2/TLICS scores a fx on (1) morphology & (2) posterior ligamentous complex injury

Let's start w/morphology

TLICS scores severity like the steps to make & eat a pizza:

Mild compression (kneading), strong compression (rolling), rotation (tossing), & distraction (tearing in) Image
3/At the most mild, w/only mild axial loading, you get the simplest fx, a compression fx—like a simple long bone fx--worth 1 pt.

This is like when you just start to kneading the dough. There's pressure, but not as much as with a rolling pin! Image
Read 13 tweets
Mar 14
1/The 90s called & wants its carotid imaging back!

It’s been 30 years--why are you still just quoting NASCET?

Do you feel vulnerable when it comes to identifying plaque vulnerability?

Here’s a thread to help you identify high risk plaques with carotid plaque imaging Image
2/Everyone knows the NASCET criteria:

If the patient is symptomatic & the greatest stenosis from the plaque is >70% of the diameter of normal distal lumen, patient will likely benefit from carotid endarterectomy.

But that doesn’t mean the remaining patients are just fine! Image
3/Yes, carotid plaques resulting in high grade stenosis are high risk.

But assuming that stenosis is the only mechanism by which a carotid plaque is high risk is like assuming that the only way to kill someone is by strangulation. Image
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(