Justinian and Belisarius: how was their relationship? Typically, historians emphasize animosity and conflict between the two elite Romans. I think this approaches their relationship from the wrong angle. Read on if interested. ⬇️ #Roman#Byzantine#History
For centuries, modern historians have argued that Justinian was jealous of Belisarius' successes and sought to undermine him whenever possible to limit his achievement. We can trace this argument at least back to Gibbon, but it is still present in a book as recent as 2021.
On what basis might modern historians be making this claim? On multiple occasions, Procopius and Agathias note that other military officers or government officials were jealous of Belisarius' success, and so they slandered him to Justinian.
It seems that there is an assumption among modern historians that Justinian himself was therefore also jealous of Belisarius and his successes, even though this is not made explicit by ancient sources.
Modern historians also assume jealousy from the two disgraces of Belisarius at the order of Justinian. In 542, B was fired from his position as General of the East and held in disgrace for months. 20 years later, in 562, B was deprived of his honors and disgraced for months.
There is no doubt that these were instances where the relationship between Belisarius and Justinian was at a low ebb. Clearly, to give orders like this Justinian must have been angry and distrusted Belisarius at the moment, and Belisarius might have resented the punishment.
But these two occasions stand out precisely because they were out of the norm. Over the long run of their lives, the relationship of Belisarius and Justinian was cordial and productive! Let's talk for a minute about just how long this relationship lasted.
Belisarius first appears in the service of Justinian as a guardsman in 526, but given his relative seniority in the guards, it is likely he had already been in service with Justinian before this date. We cannot be sure for how long.
On the other end, Belisarius and Justinian both died in 565. This means that their professional relationship lasted about 40 years!
Now, we cannot be sure the two men were close for all of those 40 years. Belisarius last served Justinian in a military capacity in 559, and there is no mention in any source of Belisarius and the emperor interacting after the former's restoration from disgrace in July 563.
But even if we take as a smaller bounds the time between Belisarius' first mention in Justinian's service (526) and his last (559), 33 years is still an exceptionally long time for a professional relationship between two powerful, elite Roman men.
And it is worth emphasizing that unlike the endings of some long-term relationships between other powerful Romans (Aetius and Valentinian III come to mind), both Belisarius and Justinian died peacefully in their beds. This relationship did not end in violence.
That Belisarius and Justinian worked together for so long, through stress, triumph, and despair (both professional and personal) is nothing short of remarkable. When considered this way, it is the stability of their relationship that stands out, not their brief disagreements. Fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Byzantine history enthusiasts often (with good reason) get irate about the Fourth Crusade. They should also celebrate the many conscientious objectors on the Fourth Crusade that refused to attack fellow Christians. This is an appreciation thread. 🧵
From the moment Enrico Dandolo, the Doge of Venice, proposed that the crusaders should attack the city of Zara, Geoffrey of Villehardouin reports: "There was much opposition."
The most articulate voice against the twisting of the Fourth Crusade is Guy, the Abbot of Vaux, who loudly proclaimed "My lords, on behalf of the Roman Pope I forbid you to lay siege to this city. For it is a Christian city and you are pilgrims."
Have you ever wanted more details about the Fourth Crusade’s attack on Constantinople in 1204? Two eyewitness accounts that are great to read together are Geoffrey of Villehardouin and Nicetas Choniates. Here are a few excerpts. 🧵
Geoffrey of Villehardouin (born around 1150) was a French knight and the Marshal of Champagne. He was one of the ambassadors to Venice who negotiated the deal for Venetian shipping of the crusade and he remained with the crusade until the end.
Nicetas Choniates (born around 1155) was a Roman civil official and governor of Philippopolis. He was an important author and historian in Nicaea, to which he fled after the conquest of Constantinople by the crusaders.
Welcome new followers! 👋 Allow me to introduce myself. I am a historian of the sixth-century Roman world and I post about all things Roman/Byzantine. My interests range from the founding of Rome to the fall of Constantinople.
In addition to posting about my own research, I also occasionally post about the field of Byzantine studies (or as I prefer to think of it, medieval Roman studies) and teaching as a university professor in the USA. Thanks for being here!
If you are new to this account, here are a few of my greatest threads. Was the Byzantine Empire Roman?
To celebrate my book's first birthday (released July 4 last year), I offer up a meditation on a curious little episode: the Vandal King Gelimer quoting the great refrain of Ecclesiastes: "Vanity of vanities, all is vanity." #Roman #Byzantine 🧵
Some background: At the command of Justinian (r. 527-565), the general Belisarius led a Roman army to crush the Vandals and restore North Africa and most of its surrounding islands to Roman control in a lightning campaign that lasted just six months (September 533-March 534).
(This is probably underselling the shocking rapidity of this victory, because all major combat operations were complete by December 533 [3 months], and everything after that was claiming far-flung outposts and forcing the besieged Vandal King Gelimer into submission.)
The Count of the Stable (Comes Stabuli, from which we derive "constable") was a late antique officer of the Roman imperial court responsible for levying horses and pack animals for government use. Although it sounds like a humble post, it was held by a number of famous Romans. 🧵
I have been writing on the Comes Stabuli recently and was astonished to learn that occupants of the office included the future emperor Valens (r. 364-378) and the famous generals Stilicho (d. 408) and Aetius (d. 454).
This is of particular interest to me since in the sixth century Belisarius held the title of ἄρχον τῶν βασιλικῶν ἱπποκόμων (Commander of the Imperial Grooms), which was presumably a variant form of the same office.
Over the past few months I engaged in a variety of media (podcasts, blogs, book sites, etc) to get word out about my new book. This thread summarizes all that activity, both to keep it in one place and to give ideas to other academics with new books!
I started with places that would let me write a few words about my book to catch the interest of other bibliophiles. The first was on a humble blog called "The Page 99 Test":