It turns out complementary N1-methylpseudouridine RNA inhibits DNAse I activity on contaminating plasmids.
This is likely the reason the vaccines are contaminated and the manufacturers should investigate other single stranded nucleases to clean this up. anandamide.substack.com/p/dna-rna-hybr…
Be a real bummer if the antibiotic you used to grow your plasmid also inhibited the enzyme you planned to use to get rid of the plasmid.
The SV40 virus seen in the polio vaccines was the full 5kb virus.
We only have the promoter on these vectors.
We have no evidence they are carcinogenic. I do have concerns over SV40 promoters integrating into the genome near an oncogene.
Keith Peden paper is a good read on this
This is an important paper.
One of the reasons we’ve been having a hard time quantitation the DNA in these vaccines is that the presence of the RNA stalls DNAse I and T5 exo.
That implies there are DNA/RNA hybrids or R-Loops in the vaccines.
It’s a very good presentation.
We are still trying to get a handle on how much of this is circular plasmid Vs fragments.
We have conflicting data on this that has prevented us from making quantitative statements.
2)we don’t have sequence confirmation of those ecoli colonies.
3)we don’t have an electroporator. Heat shock is not the most efficient means.
3)we see a large peak on the Agilent gel that could be the linear or circular plasmid or…
4)there could be cross talk with the intercalating dyes on the gels where their DNA specificity is promiscuous with N1 methylpseudoU mRNA and the peak we think is a plasmid is just mRNA getting mis-stained on the DNA gels.
Note the limit set by VRBPAC.
Note the differentiation of DNA types.
Protooncogenes…
Where does an SV40 promoter with a nuclear localization signal fit?
Is C57BL6 the right model for this?
These lab mice have extended telomeres and are less prone to cancer. @BretWeinstein