2. It’s stunning that I’m the only one making such an argument. As if millions of people worldwide hadn’t studied political science or understand how policy making works!
5. Public opinion follows, it never leads. The one notable exemption in a field of appreciable complexity is nuclear exit in Germany, and even there most international observers just project their own POV.
MDs or virologists don’t usually have qualifications in policy analysis.
7. Without Zero Covid 2030, without a goal, you will also have no funding, hence no science, no vaccines, no treatments, leaving your health up to chance.
The virus may evolve for higher viral load and broader tropism. I wouldn’t be this complacent.
9. #ZeroCovid 2030 means freedom. It is the opposite of lockdowns - reminder 👇 as you only hear this on Twitter, hence most people will never have heard it.
You CAN go for “Living with covid 2030” if you are a glutton for pain. It will decarbonize some. I wouldn’t recommend it.
Someone kindly asked about my website, so I'm sharing an archived version, whomever it may help on climate, systems, solutions.
I lack time to update - not a priority now -. If you want to advance such work, go ahead! (You can probably also hire me 🤣)🙏 web.archive.org/web/2022030611…
@GhoshAmitav@rahmstorf@jrockstrom@W_Lucht Kind reminder because we are many years behind: Climate activists and scientists can target high-leverage policies that can work within existing legal and regulatory frameworks any day. Why don't they do it? -- I don't know. Thanks and good luck, everyone,
I like this literature review not just for the pepper-coffee analysis, but also because they accurately describe the disease as SARS / COVID-19. Pathogenesis and disease course of SARS-CoV-1 / -2 are indeed almost the same.
Not sure if "Liquid Pepper Coffee to Prevent Airborne Alzheimer's" will stand up to scientific scrutiny, but that never stopped the discerning marketing genius. This thread for SARS / COVID-19 pathogenesis; bring an espresso or two (shot whiskey optional).
Did you ever apologize for playing part in giving humans SARS-CoV, @tomaspueyo, by inventing the unscientific “hammer and dance” bs metaphor, to legitimize mass infection policy?
It doesn't need to be this way -- but this, precisely, is the state of SARS-CoV-2. Spread the disease to every last human alive, to alter their minds. (yes the virus gets through the blood-brain barrier and affects the brain)
oopsie we infected hundreds of millions worldwide with a virus that causes DNA damage. - NONE of them have a plan, they're currently just grifting it because few of us care.
Oopsie you told parents ALL children will be infected (no, politics caused that), called it flu-like. You forgot to mention it's a relentlessly evolving pathogen damaging DNA and immune system
You'll find great SARS-CoV-2 studies in China CDC's weekly publication. I currently lack time to go through the details and share, apologies. weekly.chinacdc.cn/en/zcustom/cur…
China is the only state sharing such high-quality investigations publicly. They have skilled people who understand you can't run a state - even far fewer than 1.4 billion people - on magical thinking, PR, and amateurish 'expert' groupthink.
Do @rki_de, US CDC, others share such data? Maybe, somewhere? I just haven't seen it, as unlikely unpaid tweeting science 'communicator' (that's no sustainable model!). And for sure this information isn't reaching science journalists, decisionmakers, the public. (Reread #1 above)
This is a major win for the anti-nuclear movement. (Don't waste time re: new build—not gonna happen!) Looking forward, here the EU's 155 nuclear, 500 coal power plants. Energy transition remains an enormous challenge: energy-charts.info/charts/power/c…
2. It’s all about political power; if you only use econ or nat science in analysis, you will always be wrong; it’s polsci. Energy policy is a bit like foreign policy; elites HATE it when the plebs (us) are informed and force change, as happened in nuclear.
3. You cannot analyze energy without an understanding of the engineering, economics, and politics of the power sector. That’s why many of us spent years studying and working in it.
Your climate analysis will be wrong if you don’t have that expertise (yourself or on your teams).