Paul Maidowski Profile picture
Apr 16 9 tweets 4 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
1. #ZeroCovid 2030 is the goal

Activists, campaign for it. Scientists, analyze how to achieve it. Policymakers, implement it.

Different countries may pick different dates - either way it will require international cooperation.

By then we will have ten year COVID-19 survivors.
2. It’s stunning that I’m the only one making such an argument. As if millions of people worldwide hadn’t studied political science or understand how policy making works!

Pick up the slack please, this is not acceptable.

No goal = no policy = no change.
3. Key: know that public opinion has little impact on policy outcomes. Most discussions you see? Irrelevant. Power matters more.

Read political science, use the legal system, work with political entrepreneurs, unions, patients, employers, insurances—that’s how you affect change.
4. We could have learned all this from HIV in early 2020. We didn’t.

Not to worry, you can start today!
5. Public opinion follows, it never leads. The one notable exemption in a field of appreciable complexity is nuclear exit in Germany, and even there most international observers just project their own POV.

MDs or virologists don’t usually have qualifications in policy analysis.
6. ZeroCovid 2030 is important because people aren’t stupid.

If there is no goal, no credible process to follow, they will just ignore you when you go on about covid.

Without a goal of elimination/suppression, the necessary consequence is “living with covid”

It is no surprise
7. Without Zero Covid 2030, without a goal, you will also have no funding, hence no science, no vaccines, no treatments, leaving your health up to chance.

The virus may evolve for higher viral load and broader tropism. I wouldn’t be this complacent.
8.Tat is the key protein in HIV. Maybe read a bit of HIV science, it will come in handy!
9. #ZeroCovid 2030 means freedom. It is the opposite of lockdowns - reminder 👇 as you only hear this on Twitter, hence most people will never have heard it.

You CAN go for “Living with covid 2030” if you are a glutton for pain. It will decarbonize some. I wouldn’t recommend it.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Paul Maidowski

Paul Maidowski Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @_ppmv

Apr 15
Someone kindly asked about my website, so I'm sharing an archived version, whomever it may help on climate, systems, solutions.

I lack time to update - not a priority now -. If you want to advance such work, go ahead! (You can probably also hire me 🤣)🙏 web.archive.org/web/2022030611… Image
Text from ~2018-2020. I shared two rough concept notes as literature reviews in 2021 too, building on @GhoshAmitav @rahmstorf @jrockstrom @W_Lucht and many more.

All this would have been smart to address pre-war, even back in 2017. What is our plan now? Image
@GhoshAmitav @rahmstorf @jrockstrom @W_Lucht Kind reminder because we are many years behind: Climate activists and scientists can target high-leverage policies that can work within existing legal and regulatory frameworks any day. Why don't they do it? -- I don't know. Thanks and good luck, everyone,
Read 5 tweets
Apr 15
I can't believe coffee roasters and cafés haven't drunk from the "Black Pepper Coffee to Cure COVID" cup!

you're welcome ;) sevenpublicacoes.com.br/index.php/edit… Image
I like this literature review not just for the pepper-coffee analysis, but also because they accurately describe the disease as SARS / COVID-19. Pathogenesis and disease course of SARS-CoV-1 / -2 are indeed almost the same.

Hence a coffee support page ;) ImageImage
Not sure if "Liquid Pepper Coffee to Prevent Airborne Alzheimer's" will stand up to scientific scrutiny, but that never stopped the discerning marketing genius. This thread for SARS / COVID-19 pathogenesis; bring an espresso or two (shot whiskey optional).
Read 8 tweets
Apr 14
Tech dudes plus AI are the literal plague. Study climate breakdown, try to be useful, guys. Stop the wannabescientific bs. ImageImage
Did you ever apologize for playing part in giving humans SARS-CoV, @tomaspueyo, by inventing the unscientific “hammer and dance” bs metaphor, to legitimize mass infection policy?
“We can terraform Venus”

Surface temperature 462°C 🤡

Guys why don’t you stop the sixth extinction and climate breakdown first, let’s talk once that’s done
Read 6 tweets
Apr 14
It doesn't need to be this way -- but this, precisely, is the state of SARS-CoV-2. Spread the disease to every last human alive, to alter their minds. (yes the virus gets through the blood-brain barrier and affects the brain)

😘 you sure this is what you want?
oopsie we infected hundreds of millions worldwide with a virus that causes DNA damage. - NONE of them have a plan, they're currently just grifting it because few of us care.
Oopsie you told parents ALL children will be infected (no, politics caused that), called it flu-like. You forgot to mention it's a relentlessly evolving pathogen damaging DNA and immune system

HIV scientists call it eerily familiar

You're in deep trouble
cleveland.com/news/2022/10/i…
Read 8 tweets
Apr 13
You'll find great SARS-CoV-2 studies in China CDC's weekly publication. I currently lack time to go through the details and share, apologies. weekly.chinacdc.cn/en/zcustom/cur…
China is the only state sharing such high-quality investigations publicly. They have skilled people who understand you can't run a state - even far fewer than 1.4 billion people - on magical thinking, PR, and amateurish 'expert' groupthink.

yes that's bad weekly.chinacdc.cn/en/article/doi… ImageImage
Do @rki_de, US CDC, others share such data? Maybe, somewhere? I just haven't seen it, as unlikely unpaid tweeting science 'communicator' (that's no sustainable model!). And for sure this information isn't reaching science journalists, decisionmakers, the public. (Reread #1 above)
Read 6 tweets
Apr 13
1. Last week of German nuclear power!

This is a major win for the anti-nuclear movement. (Don't waste time re: new build—not gonna happen!) Looking forward, here the EU's 155 nuclear, 500 coal power plants. Energy transition remains an enormous challenge: energy-charts.info/charts/power/c… ImageImage
2. It’s all about political power; if you only use econ or nat science in analysis, you will always be wrong; it’s polsci. Energy policy is a bit like foreign policy; elites HATE it when the plebs (us) are informed and force change, as happened in nuclear.
3. You cannot analyze energy without an understanding of the engineering, economics, and politics of the power sector. That’s why many of us spent years studying and working in it.

Your climate analysis will be wrong if you don’t have that expertise (yourself or on your teams). ImageImage
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(