Court is informed that Raut and Thackerays have filed their replies.
Sr Advocate Rajiv Nayar appears for Shewale.
Sr Adv Devdatt Kamat for Thackerays: This is suit by a political party. This is unheard in common law. A political party is suing for defamation. It would mean that in a democracy there can't be any criticism.
Court: We will certainly have regard to the free speech.
Kamat: I will show that the government was toppled by illegal means.
Court: Is the speech over?
Nayar: The Bar and Bench is watching.
Court: I am not concerned about who is watching.
Court says it will not be able to hear the case today but will give a short date.
Court lists the case for hearing on May 9.
Order: List before the Joint Registrar on may 15. List before court on May 10.
*Correction. Sr Adv Devadatt Kamat appeared for Sanjay Raut. Advocate Naman Joshi appeared for Aaditya Thackeray and Advocate Nishanth Patil represented Uddhav Thackeray.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Supreme Court hearing petition filed by Gujarat riots gangrape survivor, #BilkisBano challenging decision of Gujarat government to grant remission to 11 convicts who had gangraped her and murdered her family members during the 2002 Godhra riots
The list of lawyers who will argue for the petitioners in the case and the time they will take to make submissions #samesexmarriage#SupremeCourtofIndia
#SupremeCourt hears a plea by Ramoji Rao owned publication Eenadu seeking suspension of an Andhra Pradesh government order regarding the subscription of Sakshi newspaper by village and ward volunteers
CJI DY Chandrachud: We are planning to send this to Delhi HC
Sr Adv CS Vaidyanathan: this will cast an aspersion on the entire HC
CJI: See what weighed with us is that it is not just Eenadu vs Sakshi (2 newspaper giants) but it is between two political parties. It is clear
Sr Adv Niranjan Reddy: there should not be an impression that AP HC is not able to decide the case
CJI: In Delhi HC you all will have to just travel a Km and argue the case
CJI DY Chandrachud: You people think you can Supreme Court for a ride. You cannot overreach the court. Officer of MMRCL should also be sent to jail. Ask CEO of MMRCL to be present in court !
CJI: how can the superintendent allow the felling of tress when there was a stay by this court. We allowed you to move tree authority for 84 trees felling.. but then you move the authority to fell 185 trees and they give the permission !! Without seeking our permission? both… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
SG Tushar Mehta: the authority had asked us to conduct a fresh survey since last was in 84'. court was in holiday and before we could approach they moved the court
CJI: But how did your client move the tree authority for anything above than 84 when we permitted the same
#BREAKING Sitting Calcutta HC Justice Abhiit Gangopadhyay's question in open court, 'Supreme Court judges can do whatever they want? Zamindari or not?' mentioned before #SupremeCourtofIndia
Sr Adv AM Singhvi: this cannot be allowed. Please see the full interview.. it was given to @ABPNews ... #SupremeCourtofIndia
The bench of CJI DY Chandrachud, Justices JB Pardiwala and PS Narasimha discusses
CJI: Judges do not discussing things or contradicting what appears in print
State of Kerala moves #SupremeCourt against directive of the Kerala high court to relocate a rogue elephant nicknamed Arikomban from Idukki to Parambikulam wildlife sanctuary
Adv: capture, tame it and then take a call. It is habituated to rice and it is raiding homes etc..Kerala… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
CJI DY Chandrachud: Keep the paper books of the SLP ready. We will take it #SupremeCourtofIndia
Counsel pointing to the Kerala HC order
CJI DY Chandrachud: we are not understand anything you are saying. Point us to the place .. this is a mentioning item