The new memo by Howard Marks, unsurprisingly on #SVB debacle and broader banking issues. Some points which caught my eye 📖👇
1 | “My sense is that the significance of the failure of SVB is less that it portends additional bank failures and more that it may amplify preexisting wariness among investors and lenders, leading to further credit tightening and additional pain across a range of industries and… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
2 | “I think the similarities between 2008 and 2023 are limited to the mere fact that, in both instances, problems existed at a few financial institutions. I find the common elements mostly superficial. What follows are the differences.”
3 | “Looking at the current situation, I can’t think of anything that’s highly analogous to the subprime mortgages at the heart of the GFC.”
4 | “Indeed, I think it’s safe to say the most glaring market excesses were corrected in 2022 and aren’t hanging over us now.”
5 | “When investors think things are flawless, optimism rides high and good buys can be hard to find. But when psychology swings in the direction of hopelessness, it becomes reasonable to believe that bargain hunters and providers of capital will be holding the better cards and… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
6 | “I can’t end a memo on U.S. banks without mentioning one of the biggest worries they face today: the possibility of problems stemming from loans against commercial real estate (“CRE”), especially office buildings.”
7 | “we’re very likely to see mortgage defaults in the headlines, and at a minimum, this may spook lenders, throw sand into the gears of the financing and refinancing processes, and further contribute to a sense of heightened risk.”
For those considering or holding $SCHW, some points to keep in mind:
1/ “ We believe Schwab has enough liquidity to operate its business, but we no longer believe the company is in a position to return capital.”
2/ “Schwab saw a higher degree of deposit flight in Q4 than we expected leading us to believe the problem could get worse before it gets better.”
3/ “Schwab may even need to raise additional equity capital to reassure the market of its liquidity position which would drastically change the risk/reward calculation of investing in the stock.”
1 | A fool and his money are soon parted. Investment capital becomes a perishable commodity if not handled properly. Be serious. Pay attention to your financial affairs. Take an active, intensive interest. If you don’t, why should anyone else?
2 | There is no free lunch. Risk and return are interrelated. Set reasonable objectives using history as a guide. All returns relate to inflation. Better to be safe than sorry. Never up, never in. Most investors underestimate the stress of a high-risk portfolio on the way down.
Came across this old article which has a lot of interesting ideas. The author, Robert Kirby, was a partner at Capital Group for about half a century.
The Coffee Can concept in portfolio management is widely known, but there are still interesting points to flag 🧵👇🏼
1 | Passive investor is not low-cost and it is actually not that passive at all:
“In the past 10 years, S&P has made several hundred changes, both eliminations and additions, in their portfolio, and these changes have created transaction costs for holders of index funds.”
“The changes are not the result of a formula that produces a consistent, predictable kind of alteration: They represent individual judgments of the S&P staff, based on a combination of research and intuition, just as old-fashioned, active portfolio managers do it.”
One of the stocks I added to my watchlist last month was $SCHW. A great business that delivered 18% annual returns for shareholders (before dividends) over the past 34 years.
Here are some follow-up thoughts 🧵👇🏼
1 | Having spent a bit more time on the case, I am leaning to the conclusion that the current risk/reward profile is not that attractive.
2 | If things go well, the stock goes back to $80 (+54% upside), but the risk of a complete failure is also real. From my experience, if there is even a small risk of losing 100%, it is better to avoid such opportunities.