.@RobertKennedyJr: "Tony Fauci Knew That Remdesivir Would Kill You"
"How does it kill you?" he asked. "Kidney failure, heart failure, and all-organ collapse."
"All the doctors said. You heard it again and again. 'We've never seen a virus that attacks the kidneys.' Because it… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Death by Remdesivir: Under Fauci, We Had the Highest Body Count in the World
"It [Remdesivir] was Tony Fauci's pet drug. We were the only ones that had it for a year. And we – in our country – we have 4.2% of the global population; we had almost 20% of global deaths from COVID.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
"The federal government is incentivizing hospitals to prescribe a medication which is toxic."
'It Has No Place in Medicine': The U.S. Government Will Give a 20% Bonus for Prescribing a Toxic Drug
Dr. Paul Marik (in December 2022) recalled how his hospital did not allow him to use methylprednisolone or vitamin C for Covid-19. Instead, they wanted him to use remdesivir, a… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Dr. David Martin: 'We Murdered People' With Remdesivir
"It [Remdesivir] was so deadly that the World Health Organization itself pulled the drug from consideration for Ebola treatments," denoted Dr. Martin.
I have a log of thousands of clipped videos at my fingertips with respect to COVID-19 and the subsequent injections.
If you appreciate my work and want to help fund the information war, please hit the subscribe button on my profile page (@VigilantFox) for exclusive posts.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
BANNED: The Sleep Drug So Effective, It Became Public Enemy #1
If you thought what they did to ivermectin was bad, wait till you hear what they did to this drug.
🧵 THREAD
The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below. midwesterndoctor.com/p/why-isnt-the…
Did you know modern sleeping pills disrupt healthy sleep, making you 2 to 5 times MORE likely to DIE?
There was one prescription sleep aid that actually worked.
But it was so cheap and effective, the FDA launched a 10-year campaign to take it down.
The next wave of mRNA tech is here—and AI may already be in the driver’s seat.
@JesslovesMJK warns that the same network behind controversial COVID research—funded by the Gates Foundation and tied to Ralph Baric—is now developing “computationally engineered” nanoparticle vaccines.
These new shots don’t just make spike proteins. They reprogram your cells to build synthetic nanoparticle structures inside your body—while artificial intelligence accelerates the design in ways no human could control.
She called it the next front in biological warfare and left a chilling warning: “The AIs might not need us anymore.”
What she said next will stop you in your tracks.
🧵 THREAD
Dr. Jessica Rose has published an alarming article called Genetic Delivery of Computationally Designed Protein Nanoparticle Immunogens. It covers a new paper that was recently published in Science.
In a nutshell, the group that published the paper are backed by none other than the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Burroughs Wellcome Fund, Wellcome, and NIAID. And to make matters even more interesting, Ralph Baric is listed as one of the authors.
They are expanding on the dangerous mRNA technology, which doesn’t appear to be going away anytime soon. In fact, they’ve created a new version of the MOD mRNA LNP experimental tech by adding genes that encode for nanoparticle construction.
What does all of this mean? Dr. Rose joins us to explain.
Maria opened the conversation by highlighting the Gates Foundation’s backing and Ralph Baric’s role in a new “computationally designed” vaccine study.
Dr. Rose warned that Baric’s involvement should raise major red flags, saying he’s “very implicated in the design of SARS2 itself.” Her concern was unmistakable.
The same players behind controversial COVID research are now driving another genetic experiment—this time under the name “nanoparticle immunogens.”
Her message was unmistakable: the architects of the last crisis may be building the next one, only now with technology even more powerful and potentially more dangerous.
The real causes of depression are being buried to sell a profitable myth about “chemical imbalances.”
That lie made Big Pharma billions — and turned a normal, human emotion into a medical condition.
But when researchers looked beyond serotonin, they found an inconvenient truth: addressing nutrient deficiencies and physical imbalances consistently outperforms antidepressants.
But wait till you hear what these drugs are actually doing to people. What you’re about to learn isn’t pretty.
🧵 THREAD
The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below.
Emotional dysfunction isn’t just a byproduct of modernity—it’s the fuel that keeps our system running.
That’s a big claim, I know. But when you really think about it, it makes perfect sense.
Why? Because of these four things:
• We misunderstand emotions
• Our economy profits from dysfunction
• Medicine ignores real healing
• Modern life destroys mental balance
You’ve heard it again and again. “Low salt = healthy heart”
“Salt causes high blood pressure and heart failure.”
Turns out—salt restriction is the real killer.
A major study found that low sodium INCREASES your risk of death by 34%.
When you don’t get enough salt, your blood thickens, circulation slows, and clots form.
But what about salt raising my blood pressure? You won’t believe how useless salt restriction actually is.
Here’s everything you wish you knew about salt sooner—before it became a scapegoat for a giant pharma scam.
🧵 THREAD
The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below. midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-truth-ab…
@MidwesternDoc “Eat less salt” is one of the most common health tips ever given. You’ve probably heard it many, many times.
Doctors repeat it. Health authorities push it. Food labels are built around it.
But here’s the problem: science doesn’t support it, and never really did.