🚨THREAD: I think today is a great day for questions, do you?! #TheSuspendables had a list of questions they released, and I have had a chance to go through them all now and I think these are things that every American needs the answers to. So let’s take a look, shall we?… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Jennifer Moore is in charge of Human Resources, Training and Security Clearance responsibilities at the FBI. We published emails given to us by a whistleblower, but SCRIBD removed them, because they didn’t want you to see them. Jen is one of the people responsible for merging… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
There was an “All hands” town hall meeting, but the whistleblowers who stepped forward (and are still considered employees) weren’t invited. Because of that, they decided to formulate their questions separately in this list. The FBI has NOT upheld its statutory mandate to provide… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
It’s important to note, that I can not find any documented information that shows that Moore is even TRAINED in HR, let alone running an entire department on behalf of one of the largest bureaucracies in the US Government. These first 5 questions are great, especially because the… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
This is another very good set of questions that employees of the FBI should be entitled to ask their HR department. The department that exists to look out for THEIR wellbeing (right? Isn’t that how its supposed to work, anyway?)
Were FBI employees retaliated against by having their SECURITY CLEARANCES revoked because they had a medical reason or a sincerely held religious belief and chose NOT to get the COVID vaccine? Don’t skip 14. We will get to that next.
These really needs answers.
“Does FBI Human Resources Division believe that employees refusal to comply with President Biden’s EO 14043 is a “psychological condition concern” which may justify suspension of security clearance? Does the FBI require prospective employees to pass… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
It looks like the FBI may be suspending the security clearances of people who were reinstated to employment following the injunction that stopped the vaccine mandates.
That wouldn’t be right. That would be targeting and discrimination. I wonder what Jen Moore’s answer would be… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Also, we have 19 and 20 here in this bulk, and I believe these things HAVE actually happened. Come to think of it, I believe ALL of these things have actually happened. But 19 and 20 are serious.
Does the FBI make it practice to release employees MEDICAL INFO to the MEDIA?! I… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
It seems like the language in question 22 was pulled directly from correspondence where the FBI was admonishing someone for talking about their mistreatment. I wonder if this is allowed.
This is really something. The judge doesn’t mince words with Bragg. The subpoena is legally valid, and Bragg can’t challenge OTHER subpoenas he has issue with by judge shopping. This judge has ordered retention over all of them. See next tweets for a few examples, but I suggest… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
THREAD: This deserves more commentary. There was a hearing today in front of the house where former high level gov officials told the committee things YOU probably already knew about the origin of COVID because people like US were busting our asses for the truth.
🚨THREAD: There have been new filings in the @KariLake case at the AZ Supreme Court.
REFRESH: If you remember, Hobbs and Fontes asked the SC for sanctions against Lake, and the court gave dates for briefing. When Lake briefed, not only did they dispute the sanctions, but they… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
First, I will share some of the response to the original Lake rebuttal brief, that I threaded above. Then, I will share the rebuttal to THAT made by @KariLake and her attorneys.
Elias, on behalf of Hobbs, uses the familiar buzzwords, like “Baselessly,” “Frivolous,” “peddle conspiracy theories” and “Sow distrust.” Hobbs argues that there is no factual basis for the claims Lake has made.
🚨THREAD: @KariLake has filed a brief in the AZ Supreme Court opposing the sanctions proposed against her for raising the argument that 35,563 ballots were unaccounted for and added to the total ballots at Runbeck.
Lake attorney’s are asking the court to not only deny sanctions against them, but also to consider the brief they just filed as a motion for reconsideration. To read more about the weaponization of sanctions by those who wish to punish honest legal pursuits in AZ, you can read… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Maricopa didn’t ask for sanctions, but the other parties did. In order to request sanctions due to the provisions those parties cite, the court must find (and the lawyers must successfully argue) that they brought claim for an improper motive, or that they pressed issues that… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
🚨THREAD: Yesterday in GA, Trump attorneys filed a Motion to Quash the Special Purpose Grand Jury and any evidence derived from it. Here is how CNN chose to portray the filing.
As usual, there is much, much more than meets the eye.
I am going to begin this thread, but I will likely have to pick it up later on as I have a meeting breaking up my mid-day. Ready?
Donald Trump is asking not only for the judge to order that the Special Grand Jury be rendered useless but also requesting that the DA be barred from further involvement at all.
🚨THREAD: Lake v. Hobbs in the Supreme Court of Arizona
This thread will detail the Hobbs/Maricopa et al. response to Kari Lake's petition at the AZ Supreme Court AND the Lake response to that. That isn't typical, but the Defendants in the case misrepresented the record, so the… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…