After Bar Council of India, the All District Bar Associations of Delhi has passed a resolution expressing displeasure on the day-to-day proceedings going on before the Supreme Court on the issue of granting recognition to same-sex marriages. #SameSexMarriage#SupremeCourt
The co-ordination committee of the district bar associations of the national capital has said that although the Supreme Court "plays a pivotal and crucial role in upholding the rule of law", there are certain issues that are too complex and have far- reaching consequences that… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
The resolution states that the social ramifications of the ongoing proceedings before the SC are colossal and have the potential to have an unintended impact on the fabric of the society.
"There are certain issues that are deeply entrenched in societal norms, values, and beliefs. These issues require careful consideration and public debate, as any decision or action taken without societal acceptance may have far-reaching consequences."
"Such issues require a broad-based consensus that can only be achieved through public debate and discussion. Therefore, it is important that issues that have the potential to affect society at large are discussed and debated in Parliament, where elected representatives can take… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
The resolution further states that the legislature, while drafting various laws on marriage, never envisaged the issue of marriage between people of same sex and therefore any judicial intent, when non existed, would be rendered nugatory.
"In a democratic setup, the duty of law-making is typically delegated by the electorate to its elected representatives. Thus, the legislature would be best suited to foray into the new arenas of law-making, as per the evolving needs of the society."
"The issue of same sex marriage and its societal, psychological and medical impacts are at its nascent and experimentative stage and thus should be treated with utmost caution and wide consultation and discussions."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Excise Policy Scam: Delhi's Rouse Avenue Court to pronounce today its orders on Manish Sisodia's bail plea in the money laundering case registered by the ED.
Judgement to be pronounced at 4pm by Judge MK Nagpal.
Sisodia has been behind bars since Feb 26 when he was arrested by the CBI.
He was subsequently arrested by the ED on allegations of money laundering.
On March 31, Sisodia's bail plea in the CBI case was rejected.
It is ED's case that Sisodia and other AAP leaders tweaked the excise policy to benefit certain traders. These traders in turn paid kickbacks to the AAP leader.
However, Sisodia's counsel have argued that the agencies have not been able to trace any money to him.
SG Tushar Mehta mentions that a preliminary enquiry would be needed before a FIR is registered against Wrestling Federation of India president Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh over allegations of sexual harassment twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
SG: Some preliminary enquiry may be needed. If this court orders then yes FIR can be registered. But we feel some enquiry should be there #SupremeCourtofIndia#WFIsexualharassmentcase
CJI DY Chandrachud: You know solicitor we also don't do something unless we have some material. Please furnish the material which you have on Friday.. this involves a minor etc
Sr Adv Kapil Sibal: we also have an additional affidavit on what has happened thereafter
Petitioners are expected to complete arguments by 12 pm and thereafter Solicitor General Tushar Mehta begins submissions for the Union of India #samesexmarriage#LGBTQI#gayrights
DAY 1: Notions of man, woman, genitals do not define gender in absolute sense, Supreme Court says rb.gy/jdv58
DAY 2: Argument that children of same-sex married couple will be impacted incorrect; gay, lesbian persons can already adopt individually: Supreme Court… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
CBI filed a fresh chargesheet in the excise policy case and told the court that that sanction under Section 19 of PC Act to prosecute Manish Sisodia has been taken.
Special CBI judge MK Nagpal has now posted the matter for arguments on consideration of the chargesheet on May 12.
Calcutta High Court full bench headed by Acting Chief Justice TS Sivagnanam is hearing a suo motu contempt of court matter, which was taken up against advocates, who staged protests outside Justice Rajasekhar Mantha's courtroom on January 9.
Advocates, claiming to be members of the Trinamool Congress' legal cell, had staged protests outside Justice Mantha's courtroom, alleging that he was protecting BJP's Suvendu Adhikari (@SuvenduWB) and harbouring bias against the State.
The bench also comprising of Justices IP Mukerji and Chitta Ranjan Dash was today informed that the 'contemptuous' posters that were published and pasted around the High Court vicinity, have been seized. The printer, who printed these posters have been identified.
The report… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Application mentioned in Supreme Court by jailed Godman Swami Shraddhanand seeking directions to Amazon to stop the telecast and distribution of web series #DancingontheGrave as it prejudices his case pending in #SupremeCourtofIndia
Adv Varun Thakur mentions the application
Adv Varun Thakur: the web series being published in 200 countries.. senior lawyer has been interviewed.. my rights are being prejudiced tremedously
CJI: The matter is listed before court 3, Justice KM Joseph tomorrow.. mention it there