The World Economic Forum is subtly explaining how it's Neo-Communist in a new agenda article claiming everyone wants to meet Agenda 2030 but more "civic participation" is needed to accomplish it.
Executive summary suggests Agenda 2030 is supported unanimously (can we stop pretending it's a conspiracy theory yet?), that attacks on what it calls "civil society" and "civic freedoms" are a roadblock, and that freedom means freedom from fear and want. 🚩🚩🚩
In the first paragraph, we get a look behind the curtain. Whatever they mean by "civil society" and "civic freedoms" has everything to do with "economic inequality, gender imbalances, corruption, and environmental degradation." 🚩🚩🚩
They're Neo-Communists.
What the WEF means by "civil society" and "civic freedoms" isn't what you think it means. It means equity, inclusion, and sustainability to provide the "freedoms" under that discipline, just like Mao (pics 2&3). "Civil society" means don't argue, don't protest, do go along.
We're at the halfway point in Agenda 2030 (can we please stop calling it a conspiracy theory yet?), so they're getting nervous. Things aren't going smoothly. They remind us that it's the largest bid for Communism ever attempted. It's a global revolution. It must fail.
They never question for a second if people want or even should want the world they market in their corrupted language: "peaceful," "just," "equal," and "sustainable" societies. It all sounds good in the abstract, but in the concrete it's tyranny and nonsense, like always.
The goal of the summit is to "propose strategies to accelerate the implementation of Agenda 2030" (can we stop calling it a conspiracy theory yet?!).
See, it's all been delayed by the crisis shocks they've rocked the world with specifically to implement it (pic 2). Bastards.
See, we have consensus! So it's obviously good. Thesis, antithesis, consensus. Unity under a new global standard. Democracy with centralism. Freedom under discipline. Everything is falling apart, but we are unified under the new glorious program. That's their message. It's Mao.
"people-centered commitments" 🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩
Remember when you thought it was about "civil society"? Well, it's really under the decision-making of "civil society organizations" which "forge consensus" and increase their "partnerships." It's networked Communist front organizations.
Apparently fundamental civic rights (?? individual rights? No.) are under attack! Oh no! But when we look more closely, they seem to mix legitimate concerns (China) with nonsense under twisted definitions. Leftist activism meeting any resistance seems to count.
See? Getting in their way, even when they break the law, is what it means to "restrict civic freedoms." Whether you prefer Mao or Marcuse (Repressive Tolerance), this is the Neo-Communist distortion that lets them bias the playing field to their unfair advantage.
This is probably my favorite part of this. They're still saying "build back better" because of Covid-19. Hilarious. Agenda 2030 is the point of build back better, though, as we can see. (Actually, 2050, but I digress...)
(gotta take an intermission for a meeting, BBL).
UN boss Antonio Guterres bemoans the loss of "civil society" and violations of "human rights" as the problem and urges centering them in Agenda 2030 initiatives. Look what he means by that, though: Woke and Sustainability nonsense. They always redefine everything and hide it.
Guterres insists "rising hate speech" is a violation of human rights. So are "social polarization" and "environmental degradation," as they define them. "Unequal access" is another, with Neo-Communism as the obvious "solution."
The degradation of "civic space" is cited as a key problem, but what does it mean? It means activists for the Agenda get their way and everything else is censored and excluded. "Civic space" is a political economy that advances the Agenda.
Development "must be about freedom from fear and freedom from want," so Communism, which will "ensure that the benefits are evenly spread." Source: 2013 opinion piece in the Guardian calling for the end of our current system, funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. 🚩🚩
So now we see the big push coming this year, which is obviously Neo-Communism and must be humiliated by September so we can stop Agenda 2030 at its midpoint. They're obviously nervous.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"There will be blood on your hands if you don't give us our way" is a self-harm-based hostage-taking tactic. The dynamic (not the argument) should be named and refuted every time. After you name the dynamic, you can give argument, censor, etc. Plan for this playbook.
Maybe you shouldn't ask me about what to do with this extortion. My reply to "trans kids will kill themselves if you don't do what we want" would be "ok, that's sad, and we should try to prevent it by institutionalizing them. You're extorting us with that claim."
How Leftists do a coup, so maybe people can learn to see it, stop it, and counter it.
Aside from all the usual linguistic and policy tricks, they apply Alinsky sequentially and strategically. The Left picks strategic individuals as targets and makes scapegoats of them.
They hold up an individual person on their most significant weaknesses, usually exaggerated, decontextualized, or even fabricated, and make them a symbol of something "inclusive" society has to purge. A two-minutes-hate campaign follows. Shame is heaped on. Disaster looms.
That's not all. They pick one target and media hate-bomb the hell out of them until they're infamous, but the target isn't the target. It's always something bigger and institutional. While the scramble is on over the first target, they start another campaign against a second one.
The United Nations is helping to bring the revolution to every facet of every person's life. unssc.org/courses/divers…
Doesn't this look good and important. The 2030 Agenda (not a conspiracy theory) requires "cultural sensitivity," which it calls "inclusivity" and encodes into seven of the seventeen Agenda Goals.
The goals of the reeducation are exactly what you would expect. Shut up, listen, global mindset, etc.
"According to you" is a powerful tool against the Woke.
"That's racist!" "According to you."
"That's transphobic!" "According to you."
"We need an inclusive space!" "According to you on your definitions."
Words are cheap in meaning under Woke. This cuts through that.
When a Woke accuses you of transphobia, you take for granted transphobia is a thing with a solid, stable meaning. They've got you. It doesn't have a solid stable meaning. You argue about what is, but the game is all wordplay.
"You're transphobic!" "According to you."
Woke ideology views language and reality (since language describes reality) as wholly subjective, with themselves providing the one true link between the subjective and objective. That means their words have subjective meanings. You don't have to accept them.
The real looming problem we're not looking at in education (largely because we're chasing school choice and putting out a million fires) is the incoming competency-based model that will make the entire current approach obsolete, but it's a social credit system.
Competencies will replace grades, transcripts, test scores, etc. We already see the move away from all those things in colleges and universities, and it will extend into hiring and possibly even civic participation. Some competencies will be academic and relevant, but not all.
Competency areas to be assessed and to award digital passport-like merit will be academic, social, emotional, behavioral, and all geared towards sustainability, inclusivity, equity, and global citizenship as defined by the central stakeholder councils (global Soviet).