The Spring booster campaign brings together the most vulnerable people for their 6 monthly vaccines - which are known to wane after 5m.
This is a highly vulnerable cohort of patients.
One of our Facebook members shares their story:
1/
It is incredibly worrying that the staff and volunteers at the centre were not wearing masks, particularly when interacting with vulnerable patients. The failure to follow basic infection prevention and control measures places our most vulnerable community at risk.
2/
Conflicting information provided to the patient about mask-wearing is a concern. Patients should receive clear information about safety protocols where many people are in close contact.
Miscommunication is not only confusing, but it prevents people from making safe choices.
3/
Also, the lack of clarity regarding complaints is *unacceptable*. Patients have the right to voice their concerns.
It is shocking that even vaccination centers won't prioritise the safety of their high-risk patients.
4/
Authorities must take swift action to address our concerns and ensure that ALL patients receive the highest level of care and protection during the vaccination process.
Clinically Vulnerable people (and others wearing masks) will be asked to remove them for the local elections due to new rules on voter ID, potentially putting them at risk.
The Electoral Commission has said people wearing face coverings only need to remove them "momentarily" for ID checks by polling station staff, but we argue that they need to go further to ensure the safety of the Clinically Vulnerable.
Let's talk about how public health measures are impacting human rights, specifically for Clinically Vulnerable people and households.
1/
Masks are a vital protection for those with health conditions. The withdrawal of masks in healthcare is concerning.
Clinically Vulnerable people have lost freedoms and are facing discrimination in: workplaces; schools; court hearings & job centres; without remote options.
2/
'Personal responsibility' can't replace public health. Clinically Vulnerable people are unfairly burdened to protect themselves, while being denied basic rights.
This breaches their rights under Article 14 of the HRA, which guarantees the right to non-discrimination.
3/
Decisions presented as *choices* - but with no viable options - have meant that #3Years since lockdown our members continue to live reduced lives.
@RishiSunak's government do not care for vulnerable people & they don't want you to hear us.
🧵
We have lost our JOBS and HOMES.
By not making workplaces safe Clinically Vulnerable people have had to choose between lives and livelihoods.
One in four severely immunosuppressed people reported having lost a job due to the risks from Covid.
Most *chose* to quit.
2/
We have lost SCHOOLING.
Over half of Clinically Vulnerable Families report being encouraged by schools / local education authorities to withdraw their children from education by threatening fines and prosecutions.
We are * 3️⃣ YEARS * into a pandemic (ask the @WHO) and our needs have not been addressed.
Protections were withdrawn one by one and the removal of these measures has unfairly disadvantaged us.
1/
We are STILL HOME.
We are living part lives.
Our freedoms have been lost.
If you are not in a vulnerable group this information will likely have slipped you by. You will not have noticed us struggling because we are no longer in your view.
2/
We move around like ninjas.
We avoid crowded places.
We probably don't meet with you any more.
This is not through choice. This has been thrust upon us, by the same government that joked they would
"Let the bodies pile high in their hundreds of thousands.".
3/
We are concerned about the abrupt end to the Covid-19 Infection Survey which we feel will unfairly result in barriers and disadvantages to protected groups:
Disabled (those who are Clinically Vulnerable), Elderly and Ethnic Minorities.
@janemerrick23 explained the gold
standard' survey has been key to our
surveillance. The @WHO have not declared
an end to the pandemic and lives remain
under threat of death & serious injury (Long
Covid).
We need this information to risk assess. It also provides essential information on the impacts on our members.
When the government told us last year to Live with Covid they took away testing and isolation, measures that protected us all from infection and reinfection.