Randy Hillier's motion for a change of venue was dismissed today by Justice Kevin Phillips of the Superior Court of Justice. Justice Phillips dismissed the motion "summarily" which means he didn't permit the parties to even have a hearing. Respectfully, he got it wrong. 🪡🧵
Firstly, I'll say that I am not going to lay out all of my criticism for this decision. Judges cannot respond to criticism and so public criticism is not the best way to address a judicial decision. I will, however, make some comments about the worst aspects of his decision.
Summary dismissal is a drastic result. In a situation like this, it can only be issued where there is no chance of success of the motion. To this, Justice Phillips likened Mr. Hillier's motion to the motion brought by James Bauder and Pat King.
The Bauder/King motions dealt almost exclusively with general claims of media bias towards the #FreedomConvoy. Justice Phillips' point is that: "the issue of change of venue in cases of accused persons facing charges arising out of the “Freedom Convoy” has [already] been decided. Image
In @randyhillier's case, our argument went well beyond the argument of Mr. Bauder and was particularized to Mr. Hillier specifically. I note that in the Bauder decision, the judge there said: Image
"There was not a great deal of media coverage focused on Mr. Bauder. [...] I seriously doubt that Mr. Bauder is well known to Ottawa residents. The adverse coverage in the media that Mr. Bauder complains of is directed at the Freedom Convoy, not at Mr. Bauder specifically.
In our case, we supplied the judge with over 100 examples of local members of the community specifically demonizing Mr. Hillier, particularly in relation to the conduct for which the Crown now seeks to prosecute Mr. Hillier.
Furthermore, it was not only the breadth of our argument which went beyond the scope of cases coming before ours but also the depth; our evidentiary record showed demonization of the Freedom Convoy at the institutional level including this tweet:

We also referenced the creation of the @ottpeoplescomm using taxpayer money.
For all of these reasons, it is beyond dispute that Mr. Hillier was entitled to a fair hearing over whether or not his venue should be changed. Justice Phillips denied that hearing from even proceeding. However the wrongness of his decision goes further.
Justice Phillips rendered his decision - denying a hearing - without hearing from the parties on whether or not summary dismissal was appropriate. This is itself a clear and unambiguous legal error (According to Ontario's highest Court): Image
"The trial management authority to dismiss Charter motions summarily will not be exercised fairly if this authority is used without first permitting submissions from the accused as to whether summary dismissal is warranted"
Lastly, possibly the most ironic part of Justice Phillps' comments today was that he said "Twitter is not real life" - apparently dismissing the value of the hundreds of tweets supplied as evidence.
The irony, of course, is that the Crown is prosecuting Mr. Hillier because, according to the Crown, his Tweets have consequences which are criminal. It is in this same light that we would have argued that widespread opinions on Twitter also have consequences to trial fairness.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Anber, Criminal Lawyer 🇨🇦

David Anber, Criminal Lawyer 🇨🇦 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DavidAnber

Apr 26
Last year, former MPP Randy Hillier was charged with criminal offences in relation to his support for the #FreedomConvoy. His trial is currently set to be held in Ottawa. Tomorrow we argue a change of venue motion so that he can be tried in a jurisdiction other than #Ottawa.
In Ottawa, the #ArrestRandyHillier hashtag was prominent during the time. Further, the city and other local politicians have demonized the Freedom Convoy. One such example is the creation of @ottpeoplescomm funded largely by the taxpayers of Ottawa.
Another example is when then-mayor @JimWatsonOttawa tweeted his support for #ZexiLi who had received the “city builder” award from the City of Ottawa for her role as the lead plaintiff in a massive class-action lawsuit naming tens of thousands of ottawa residents as defendants.
Read 6 tweets
Jun 18, 2022
✍️ PLEASE ADD TO THIS THREAD

Many have contacted me lately asking what to do about dealing with the small fringe minority of businesses that continue to require masks in their establishments.

This thread is to list CANADIAN 🇨🇦businesses that do/don’t have such a requirement.
Of particular interest are businesses in the health or quasi-health field i.e. dentist offices, physiotherapists etc. who no longer require masks. Other than that, any business where you believe sharing the information might be of general interest to the community is welcome.
Also, any details you can include may be helpful. For instance: if a business does not allow a medical exemption to their private mask mandate. I note that there might be a legal avenue to challenging such an unmitigated requirement but THAT IS OUTSIDE MY AREA OF LEGAL EXPERTISE.
Read 4 tweets
May 28, 2022
🧵I wanted to elaborate a thread on this point for those who were interested.
I wrote “The problem with our present situation — particularly in 🇨🇦 & very particularly in Ontario — is we have some laws which apply to everyone but which are very broad & thus rarely enforced (because to do so would capture tons of conduct) but they can be used selectively.”
Take for example the Trespass to Property Act. There’s all sorts of annoying human conduct which we (properly) put up with. The owner of a property (say a shopping mall) may not care for people with blue hair; ppl who have bad breath; people who talk loudly; ppl in large groups
Read 14 tweets
May 12, 2022
During the pandemic, between 99.7% & 99.97% of Ont’s pop @ any given time was COV-neg. Of the COV+, many/most of them knew they were sick & isolated. Of the rest you’d need maskless PROLONGED face/face contact & even if transmitted, over 95% of the time it was no worse than flu.
I am tweeting this out because people like @twpiggott, @drmwarner, @maddyeisenberg and others continue to spread the disinformation that just because masks show some slight effectiveness in labs or contrived studies that this translates to any real impact in the real world.
You don’t need to be a statistician to know when you take a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of a percent, that this translates to a statistically insignificant outcome. Almost all large comparative datasets we now have confirm that there is no impact from wide-scale masking.
Read 6 tweets
Apr 2, 2022
💉AM I VACCINATED❓

For as long as the vaccines have been available, I’ve wrestled with whether or not to publicly reveal my vax status. In this🧵, I decide to publicly indicate if I have been vaccinated or not & the reasons behind my decision & also my decision to reveal it.
First, I’ll say that I have long believed that personal medical decisions are private and people should not be in the habit of talking about them any more than they would any other medical procedure/decision. It should be even more-so taboo for people to ask. I still believe this
For reasons I get into below, I believe it is silly the way that people have turned their vaccination status into some kind of badge of virtue and I believe it’s horrifying how it’s become a club to beat others with. In revealing my status, I do so (notwithstanding above) because
Read 23 tweets
Mar 21, 2022
As #WearAMask trends, we mustn’t forget how mask mandates arose. Recall in March/April/May of the first wave (2020) masks were not mandatory. Some people who were very scared wore masks. Public health experts like Fauci or @CPHO_Canada reminded us the science didn’t support that.
But the mask wearers became resentful that everybody did not share their paralyzing fear. And this is when suddenly the propaganda arose that masking apparently healthy people was about ‘protecting others’. The purpose of this line of fallacy was to defeat any argument of choice.
We now have ample data from Canada and elsewhere, that COVID is seasonal & mask mandates did little-to-nothing to affect the spread.

But the mask-wearers are just as resentful as they were before—even more so now since the wide-scale abandonment of masks will give us more data.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(