Ryan Goodman Profile picture
May 1 7 tweets 16 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
I'm thrilled we have recovered 33 of the expert statements submitted to the #January6th Select Committee.

Addressing the state of U.S. democracy and political violence.

All now publicly available @just_security.

Read Introduction by @jhglick here.👇

justsecurity.org/86298/introduc…
2. Jacob Glick's synthesis of the expert statements is its own wake up call.

A threat assessment for U.S. democracy with white Christian nationalism and anti-government violent extremism, and political leaders willing to exploit. Also places United States within global trends.
4. The extraordinary list of experts includes (alphabetically 9-14):

@katie_clayton14
@ntdPhD
@BrendanNyhan
@EthanVPorter
@TJRyan02
@thomasjwood
@RethinkIntel
@GorskiPhilip @jaredlholt
Aziz Huq (@UChicagoLaw)
@tomginsburg
@MikeAJensen
@Liz_Yates_
Sheehan Kane (@START_UMD) Image
5. The extraordinary list of experts includes (alphabetically 15-21):

@RachelKleinfeld
@ashkenaz89
@bjornih
@LilyMasonPhD
@NathanKalmoe
@julie_wronski
@UptonOrwell
@katemasur
Gregory Downs (@ucdavis)
Mary McCord (@GeorgetownICAP)
@jenmercieca
@SuzanneMettler1
@r_lieberman Image
6. The extraordinary list of experts includes (alphabetically 22-27):

@JNelsonLDF
@thetrevorpotter
@CandaceRondeaux
@wbend
Cuong Nguyen (@NewAmerica)
@michael_SIMONE
Thomas Taylor (@NewAmerica)
@walkeroh
@rothschildmd
@AndrewLSeidel
Peter Simi (@ChapmanU) Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ryan Goodman

Ryan Goodman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rgoodlaw

Apr 29
Inroads

Re: Special Counsel investigation into Jan. 6th Big Lie fundraising

"The Justice Department, with its ability to bring criminal charges, has been able to prompt more extensive cooperation from a number of witnesses" compared to select committee.

nytimes.com/2023/04/28/us/…
2. The NYT reporting is by @maggieNYT @alanfeuer @jonathanvswan

I happened to speak with @ErinBurnett @OutFrontCNN on Friday about this part of the criminal case.

It potentially sweeps in several Campaign/RNC officials who, with criminal jeopardy, have reason to cooperate.
3. As discussed @CNN, this part of the criminal case is bolstered by new reporting that outside firms -- hired by Trump Campaign itself -- reported to the campaign that all the election fraud claims were bogus.

Most recent scoop on that from @jdawsey1👇

washingtonpost.com/nation/2023/04…
Read 5 tweets
Apr 28
I spoke with @ErinBurnett @OutFrontCNN about potential significance of Pence testimony before grand jury.

All Pence needs to do is repeat — under oath — what’s in his book, and it’s impactful.

Here are some examples from the book (hat tip: @thomasjoscelyn’s research)…
<thread>
2. Exhibit one.

From Pence's book (and now presumably under oath):

In Jan 5 Oval Office meeting with Trump, the VP insists the Constitution does not give him authority to interfere with the certification.

Trump counters: "You want to play by Marquess of Queensberry rules." Image
3. Exhibit two.

From Pence's book (and now presumably under oath):

Pence tells Trump he opposed (bonkers) lawsuit by Rep. Gohmert because Pence did not believe he had constitutional authority to reject electoral votes.

Trump replies: "You're too honest." Image
Read 8 tweets
Apr 20
I wrote this with @AWeissmann_

We unpack a theme that cuts across Dominion v Fox and People of NY v Trump.

How media companies - Fox in 2020 and National Enquirer in 2016 - were deployed for a political campaign. What can and can't be done about it.

theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
2. A notable similarity:

Judge in Dominion case ruled against Fox's claim that it was just reporting the news.

Less well known: FEC determined the National Enquirer/AMI was not covered by "press exemption" and, by its own admissions, company violated campaign finance laws.👇 Image
3. As an aside: that determination by Federal Election Commission nonpartisan staff is highly relevant to Manhattan DA Bragg's indictment.

It is further support for the claim that the 2016 hush-money scheme violated federal campaign finance law.

link: justsecurity.org/wp-content/upl… Image
Read 4 tweets
Apr 4
Another flawed idea circulating on Twitter: indictment for false business records fails if Trump's were just internal bookkeeping.

We touched on this issue in @just_security article (with thanks to guidance from @Delavegalaw).

Who to trust on this? The true experts.

Thread...
2. Here's former Chief Assistant Manhattan DA @DanielRAlonso explaining:

The DA Office charged "it *all* the time. By definition business records are internal."

3. Former Manhattan Assistant District Attorney @rroiphe:

"we used the felony falsification statute to charge people with the broader definition of intent to defraud the government (Banking laws etc) and we did not require submitting the records."

Read 7 tweets
Mar 30
Prescience👏

8/25/22: @AWeissmann_ predicts DA would press Weisselberg to flip by threatening new charges while in Rikers

3/29/23: @Jose_Pagliery reports DA "prosecutors in recent weeks have discussed applying additional pressure to Weisselberg" with charges while in Rikers
2. Also note, from @Jose_Pagliery reporting, that the specific charge DA prosecutors are contemplating is insurance fraud, pivoting off NY AG Complaint on Sept 21, 2022.

One person, very quickly noted a remarkable passage in the AG Complaint.

Andrew👇
3. Seven days ago, @AWeissmann_: "is DA Bragg contemplating charging Weisselberg for insurance fraud (spelled out in Letitia James civil suit) and Weisselberg may finally flip on Trump?"

🎯!!

Read 4 tweets
Mar 28
Key and likely to satisfy DOJ:

"Boasberg ruled that while Pence does have some limited protections because of [Speech or Debate], the immunity does not prevent him from testifying about conversations related to alleged 'illegality' on Trump’s part."

nbcnews.com/politics/donal…
2. Looks like very narrow carveout:

"The judge said ... that Pence can still decline to answer questions related to HIS ACTIONS on January 6 itself, when he was serving as president of the Senate." (my emphasis added)

cnn.com/2023/03/28/pol….
3. NYTimes report is along the same lines:

"Judge Boasberg also said that Mr. Pence would have to testify to the grand jury about any potentially illegal acts committed by Mr. Trump, the person familiar with the matter said."

That may be the ballgame.
nytimes.com/2023/03/28/us/…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(