We have nurses & junior doctors on strike & consultants potentially joining them very soon. Lets talk about inflation & pay. How to fix this car crash (& perhaps more importantly, how NOT to). Please read full 𧡠to end and share / RT
2/29 Lets start with the excellent pay graphs from the excellent @jburnmurdoch from the @FT published this week.
What do they show? They show we are NOT "all in this together"
@jburnmurdoch@FT 3/29 Let me explain. The top blue line - representing "all workers" from "all sectors" are broadly close in pay terms where their pay was in March 2009 - before austerity began to bite (around only 3.1% below in real terms)
@jburnmurdoch@FT 4/29 But nurses when measured against "CPI" measure of inflation are up to Dec 22 (the latest @NHSDigital data) are DOWN 12.2% and junior doctors a shocking 23.6% DOWN against this measure
@jburnmurdoch@FT@NHSDigital 5/29 Now you may have seen other figures, because of different ways of measuring the loss. First it depends WHEN the comparison STARTS- @FT graphs starts in Mar 09 (12 m to March 09) when public sector pay austerity broadly started, @NuffieldTrustπ misses v steep initial loss
@jburnmurdoch@FT@NHSDigital@NuffieldTrust 6/29 Secondly there are different measures of inflation. The most commonly used is CPI or "consumer price index", others include "retail price index". The former is preferred by government & economists.
@jburnmurdoch@FT@NHSDigital@NuffieldTrust 7/29 The latter RPI runs higher generally, but is a valid measure & is even used by government i.e. in student loans.If you think these are bad π those losses against RPI are much greater - nurses would be DOWN 23.7%, and junior doctors DOWN 33.6% (to Dec 22).
@jburnmurdoch@FT@NHSDigital@NuffieldTrust 8/29 Finally there are different pay measures. The @FT have used official @NHSDigital "average earnings" data including for example overtime, out of hours payments etc. Others comparison may use basic pay, or "take home" pay which would include for example pension contributions
@jburnmurdoch@FT@NHSDigital@NuffieldTrust 9/29 So many ways to skin a cat. If done correctly they are all valid. So since @jburnmurdoch excellent & shocking chart (LT) gots lets of traction, I set out to see if it was accurate. To do that, I set out to see if it was reproducible from publically available data (RT)
@jburnmurdoch@FT@NHSDigital@NuffieldTrust 10/29 And unsurprisingly given the total legend that is @jburnmurdoch@FT, his chart is accurate and reproducible. Junior pay is tricky due to contract change, but I broadly agree with his methodology to overcome this hence my chart (RT) is virtually identical to his (LT)
@jburnmurdoch@FT@NHSDigital@NuffieldTrust 11/29 The initial FT chart look at two groups who have already ballotted for IA - nurses & junior doctors. Other groups have seen similar terrible erosion of pay and are about to ballot if government don't get their act together including consultants which I have added belowπ
@jburnmurdoch@FT@NHSDigital@NuffieldTrust 12/29 As noted above, there are different ways of looking at pay erosion for example using this "@FT methodology" (LT; gross earnings; CPI) vs for example that seen in the BMA pay campaign (RT; take home; RPI) - both are correct but expressing the loss in a different way
@jburnmurdoch@FT@NHSDigital@NuffieldTrust 13/29 So like junior doctors, consultants have seen AWFUL erosion of pay which is broadly equivalent to juniors when measured this way.
I can see why @jburnmurdoch has used "all workers, all sectors" as the comparator, but there are others which might be more representative
@jburnmurdoch@FT@NHSDigital@NuffieldTrust 14/29 So for example @ONS have other pay comparators like "professional, scientific & technical" which might be a more apt comparator for highly skilled doctors & nurses - this comparator does better than inflation in the same time period (grey line)
@jburnmurdoch@FT@NHSDigital@NuffieldTrust@ONS 15/29 Or perhaps noting the @bankofengland comments this week we all "need to accept they are poorer", maybe lets compare to how others are doing in another @ONS dataset "finance & business services" (grey line)
Maybe everyone isnt feeling poor in equal measure @bankofengland
@jburnmurdoch@FT@NHSDigital@NuffieldTrust@ONS@bankofengland 16/29 So in summary so far, there is HUGE inequality on whose pay has been eroded. Nurses and in particular doctors of all grades, have seen the largest cuts making the UK very uncompetitive & "leaky" and unable to *RETAIN* doctors & nurses
Inflationπ½π(green)- prices still go UP but more UP SLOWLY
The crucial point is that *PRICES ARE ALWAYS GOING UP* (unless inflation is negative, which is rare)
@jburnmurdoch@FT@NHSDigital@NuffieldTrust@ONS@bankofengland 19/29 The *ONLY* way pay can compensate for this is with a *CONSOLIDATED* pay rise, a one off "bonus" does nothing to help you pay NEXT years higher prices, or later years, or indeed higher prices in your reitrement (another reason why rises must be consolidated i.e. pensioned)
@jburnmurdoch@FT@NHSDigital@NuffieldTrust@ONS@bankofengland 20/29 So you will have heard that inflation is coming down. And thats right it is coming down. So the @OBR_UK predict inflation will come down rapidly, largely due to falling energy prices which are now similar in price to the start of the Ukraine invasion.
@jburnmurdoch@FT@NHSDigital@NuffieldTrust@ONS@bankofengland@OBR_UK 22/29 So given at the time of writing this thread our nursing colleagues @theRCN are on strike, and have rejected a pay offer from government, lets have a quick look at that offer. To look at that offer, lets consider the impact of falling inflation as predicted by @OBR_UK
@jburnmurdoch@FT@NHSDigital@NuffieldTrust@ONS@bankofengland@OBR_UK@theRCN 23/29 So @OBR_UK also predict what will happen to pay across the whole economy (thats the dotted blue line), now extended to end of 25/26. So the "whole economy" will be back up above that "zero" baseline (and no doubt our other comparators will do even better than that)
@jburnmurdoch@FT@NHSDigital@NuffieldTrust@ONS@bankofengland@OBR_UK@theRCN 24/29 So where does that leave NHS staff? In a difficult place I would say. The 6% non-consolidated "bribe" (down orange arrow) helps staff for that year (22/23) but then leaves them right back where they started, which is massively down. Doesnt seem "fair" or "generous" me
2/ in the level has increased, and also a partial fix to #FixNegativePIAs and also minor changes to the taper. All of these will help doctors not reduce hours & avoid extras
(ii) The media focus is also on retirements only, but capacity in the NHS is also about how much work one
3/ can do *before* retirement. Changes to AA & LTA will help reverse the trend to reduce hours where people were being stung unfairly by both taxes. This element of πΌhours much more likely to make a big long lasting impact
Chancellor @Jeremy_Hunt is on his feet and starting to give his speech. I'll be tweeting live on anything related to NHS pensions in particular (& lots of changes expected so pay attention!)
Read to the end, & RT once you have!
2/ There has been intense media speculation over the last week so we are expecting that will be movement on #pension taxation as per the headline of the @Telegraph yesterday.... so lets see what makes it to the FINAL budget πΏ
3/ Please make sure you read to the end
As with all of these things #TheDevilisInTheDetail, this 𧡠will expand during the chancellors speech, & finally detail will be added once the budget documents are added later this PM (including any required addenda as more detailed known)
2/ The @FT covering a point I made yesterday questioning why the LTA is rumoured to be restored to its near previous peak, however the AA (a *much* bigger problem in the NHS), is being restored only to a fraction of it
3/ And whilst I agree with the quote it will help people doctors remain in the worforce.... (though raising the AA more would help even more) .....
1/ Pleased that the government finally appear to be listening mode πas to what will work (addressing root cause of the "doctors tax" as they call it - AA & LTA) rather than what wont work (massivley complex flexibility)
Some thoughts, please read & RT
2/ First things first - the obvious point. Whilst both taxes (AA & LTA) important, AA is significantly more of an issue than the LTA (& also has complexity of tapering). But lets take them in turn
3/ Weve been hearing for a while that government know the LTA is a problem for higher earner in the NHS. @BorisJohnson hinted that he will "fix it" in 2019
"GPs and consultants will continue to be 'pounded unfairly' by tax penalties despite changes to the NHS pension scheme announced by the government, doctors' leaders have warned."
2/ @Vish_Sharm "Fundamentally, these changes do not directly address the issues caused by annual or lifetime allowance and do nothing for the tens of thousands of mid-career consultants and GPs, for whom partial retirement would not be an option"
3/ BMA pensions adviser Dr Tony Goldstone said on Twitter that the decision to delay partial retirement rules until October this year was a 'very poor decision' that could drive some doctors out of the NHS.
2/ Its *EXTREMELY* dissapointing they have ignored feedback on #FixNegativePIAs
It's completely untrue to say the member "has not had a reduction in pension benefits"
If pensionable pay falls *relative* to inflation, that exactly what you have had #pensiontheft
& they know it
3/ Its incredibly misleading to suggest if pay rises, so does pension "as long as there had been increase in pensionable pay".
Everybody knows (incl. government officials I've met) that the intention of the Finance Act is to measure growth *above inflation*, so πREMAINS untrue