There were 6 speakers but the last 2 were kiddos who went at the same time so technically we heard 5 separate addresses.
However…
2/ …3 of those addresses came from total randoms seemingly there to support Kurt’s bullshit from the previous mtg when & where he fully embarrassed himself w/ a tantrum over teacher training. So basically there were 2 addresses.
This calls for a brief but important aside…
3/ Anyone else see a pattern here?
1. Kurt’s an asshole and/or doesn’t know stuff and/or embarrasses himself 2. At the next mtg, random jerks speak on stuff that *conveniently* *could* support/defend/bolster Kurt’s ridiculous/inappropriate behavior 3. Rinse 4. Repeat
4/ We may need to revisit this with its own thread actually. Going through just the last few meetings, there’s been that many instances which fit this pattern.
For now, back to the 4-26-23 meeting…
5/ First up, Jenn “Dossiers For Days”-
and hey, let’s pause real quick to give credit where credit is due. While the other regular bigots have disappeared following Char’s loss to Kurt (including Char herself 👀) Jenn remains on her bullshit. Good for you, Jenn.
Oh! But wait…
6/ Can we pls have a board pres who knows what they’re doing? #WeAreChandlerUnified & WeNeedAGrownUp running these mtgs. FFS, Jason- Barb can’t keep kicking you under the table (probably) to remind you to do your job, like how you “need to read the thing that we have to do.” 🤦🏻♀️
7/ Then, after a really well-versed reading of “that thing” that Jason is very familiar w/ & definitely understands, a bigot known for repeatedly handing out hate-filled dossiers at these mtgs had to take control of the mtg to establish how long addresses could be.
Super duper.
8/ Ok, Jenn, whatcha got for us tonight? 🍿
Well, the first half of her 3 minutes sounded like she was reading her LinkedIn profile, and then…
9/…by the time she was done, she averaged an impressive one “we parents” every 36 seconds. AND, if you count her “we tax-payers” that jumps to a staggering once every 30secs!
Like I said earlier, Jenn is never not on her bullshit. 😂
10/ Up next: some random who I can only assume was given a script that she didn’t read, practice, or even understand. I don’t know how else to explain this performance. It’s almost second-hand embarrassing to watch. Just remember she came to peddle paranoia & defend racism.
11/ Next: this “former parent” (did he give his kids back?) presented what can only be described as nonsense from someone who doesn’t know anything about any of this. He offered an “analogy” which was just some long-winded irrelevant anecdote from 30 years ago.
At first… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
12/…I thought the audio was static-ey in these recordings but I’m starting to think that’s just the sound you hear when the bottom of the barrel is being scraped.
Next: an address that just couldn’t make it 3 mins without mentioning CRT from someone who…
13/ …may be running for a CUSD board spot next year…? And who filed her SOI just days before appearing out of nowhere to speak at this meeting? 🤷🏻♀️ I dunno. twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
14/ I guess later we’ll know more on that. Sorry if I ruined some surprise announcement. It was that or post about what appears to be some now-defunct private school she was involved in a few years ago.
15/ Ok this is DEFINITELY the note to finish on. These 2 precious & delightful kiddos were the palate cleanse we all needed, despite the unfortunate & unfair circumstances which led to them appearing that night to address the board.
ALA, proudly ensuring neither “A” is ever mistaken for anything resembling “Academia.”
I want to laugh at this, but also who out there still hasn’t gotten the memo that charter schools are $ making schemes designed by zealots to starve public education into eventual collapse?
Since that original thread got broken up, here’s a link to the first part starting with someone in a feud w/ pronouns. 😂
Now if I had to pick I’d probably fight adj’s but hey- y’all keep electing the folks who keep this keepin’ on. B/c you’re “fiscally conservative,” right? 😉
1/ Y’all I stepped away for a few hours and SO MANY receipts poured in… 🤯
FIRST… I’m being told this TT video (👇👇 below 👇👇) w/excerpts from this Forbes article explaining a dangerous, antisemitic conspiracy theory: forbes.com/sites/conormur…
2/ was posted last night and was up for hours. Apparently it includes all standard precautions to be compliant w/TT’s TOS? But it was suddenly removed this morning.
There’s some modified version up now but not a video? Idk. I need a cool and/or young person to ask.
3/ What does this have to do w/the Lily pages being down?
While there’s clearly a Lily vs Katey McPherson feud brewing, for some reason ppl felt tweet lady 😵💫 was unfairly criticized by Lily & maybe that’s b/c of her close relationship w/ Katey?
1/ *sigh* @ChandlerUnified #CUSD & everyone who needs to here this:
🗣️ GRIFTERS ARE GONNA GRIFT.
Is this movie recommendation an official endorsement by the district? Is this the official position of anyone officially in charge of children? And not 💰💰💰?
Asking b/c…
2/ Our resident “social media awareness expert” (👀🚩) is using @ChandlerUnified (again) this time to promote THIS movie, which in turn promotes…
Bark! You know, that spyware, phone & shit, etc Katey sells. 🙄
2/ A closer look revealed Scott has an affinity for using 💜 emojis - nbd - but also that Scott’s pronouns are she/her.
No judgement here. But it did seem odd given the apathy/hostility faced when trying to get them to care about what trans/nonbinary kids have been put through.
3/ Scott publicly identifies here as female & seems to wholeheartedly embrace her true self “liking” some sort of beauty bar. As she should!
But again- why the nasty reactions to so many ppl saying hey but our trans/nonbinary kids have been suffering too…?
11 speakers.
3 CUSD parents (plus Ann).
2 of them were there to speak about violence against their son(s) in school in Chandler.
Gilbert Bridget took away a minute from each of them for this:
11/ I get it. You oranges (suddenly) care so much about (some) students and are very upset about things (you are exaggerating and/or making up) that you read about online (b/c everything there is true) such as as “sextortion” and FENTANYL FENTANYL FENTANYL!
12/ This is a good time to remind y’all that a closed mouth gathers no feet. If you’re here for the first time, search my tweets for what I’ve said about how students are treated, how they’re being failed, who is failing them, etc before offering up your opinion on any of this.
1/ Anyone else curious why a c3 nonprofit (not based in @cityofchandler) backing a recall effort of a @ChandlerUnified board member freaked out over ?s/concerns raised on FB by #CUSD voters?
And then started offering “let’s meet in person for coffee and discuss” invites to them?
2/ And then they began blocking those who declined the bait & switch bullshit?
And then they deleted the entire post?
And when one #CUSD mom showed up in good faith this morning for what she was told would be a chat over coffee, she was ambushed by a fb live they had planned?
3/ And in the comments on that fb live, staunch supporters of their effort were already laughing about the #CUSD mom showing up unprepared…? For an “interview” ? But I didn’t see any invitations extended for an “interview,” did y’all?