Erin Remblance Profile picture
May 3 9 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
When it comes to choosing between achieving sustainability goals or pursuing growth, 99% (maybe more?) of the time companies will choose growth and expansion.

(1/9)

footwearnews-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/footwearne…

#degrowth
In this example Crocs can't achieve its initial sustainability goals because it acquired a brand and because of its "ongoing global expansion", even though they admit that their initial net-zero by 2030 goal was "neither vast nor fast enough".

(2/9)
To be clear, Crocs Inc had committed to a net-zero target and has a global head of sustainability, which is a "a newly created position at Crocs to help hit the ambitious goal of being net zero".

(3/9)
Neither of these things made a difference to its strategy, BAU has prevailed, & the growth is reflected in its increasing GHG emissions: "[I]n 2022, Crocs said it saw a 45% increase in total emissions … due to the company’s continued growth and data transparency".

(4/9)
Yet - in vast contrast to the actual data, which is the only thing the atmosphere cares about - the company CEO says "[w]e are pleased with the progress we have made in our ESG journey & are as committed as ever to becoming a more sustainable & equitable global organization.”
Thankfully, "it expects Q1 revenues to grow between 27 percent and 30 percent, compared to Q1 of 2022", because while we might be in the 6th mass extinction event, the last thing we would want is for genuine attempts at sustainability to get in the way of revenue growth.

(6/9)
We are living globally as if we have 1.7 Earths & in the home country of this org as if we have 5.2 Earths. We have to consider what activity we NEED for human & planetary wellbeing & which ones simply feed the growth machine, the very machine at the core of our ecological crises
I suspect in a genuine democracy where there was a much greater awareness of our planetary overshoot thanks to leadership, media and education, many of these businesses would no longer exist.

May we reach a social tipping point where such systemic changes are possible.

(8/9)
In the words of George Monbiot, this is how we bring about systemic change:

(9/9)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Erin Remblance

Erin Remblance Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @remblance_erin

May 5
Some of my favourite threads and articles from the last week-ish, roughly in order of (1) problem -> (2) way forward -> (3) momentum:

(1) Problem: our growth-based economies are at the heart of our ecological crises

🧵 (1/16) Image
"The fact is that we cannot keep growing the same cancerous way ‘except solar’. It’s like saying I’m going to switch lung cancer for eye cancer. I mean, still cancer…. we’re getting a brutal lesson this century whether we want it or not."

(2/16)

indica.medium.com/why-solar-wont…
“…we must rapidly reduce consumption/destruction of natural resources and associated fossil fuel use. This is only achievable by reversing economic ‘growth’ …. This is not unrealistic or anti-capitalist — it’s counting.”

(3/16)

medium.com/@JacksonDamian…
Read 16 tweets
Mar 31
Over the course of history, all new energy sources have been *incremental* to existing energy sources. This includes renewables - thus far they have not replaced fossil fuels, which continue to grow in usage. (1/7)
Our growth-based economic system means that we turn that new energy into more consumption rather than displace existing sources of energy. GDP and energy use are virtually correlated on a 1:1 ratio (2/7)
Thankfully we can live happy, healthy lives with less energy, this study shows that “decent standards of living could be provided to a growing global population for less than 40 per cent of the energy used around the world today.” (3/7)

euronews.com/green/2020/10/…
Read 7 tweets
Mar 27
Essential reading.

Thanks @KBRH87 for compiling.

🧵 (1/12)

#degrowth #ClimateAction
(2/12)
(3/12)
Read 12 tweets
Mar 23
Yesterday I was asked: “what are the 5 things you think everyone needs to know?”

So, I thought I’d share them here too:

1. This chart from the IPCC 6th Assessment Synthesis report, released this week, shows just how far away we are from limiting warming to below 2C: (1/11) Image
We need to be doing much more. Wealthy nations - like Australia - should be aiming to reduce emissions by 75% by 2030 (the current Labor government has a target of 43% reduction and are relying on controversial carbon offsets for much of it). (2/11)
2. Global Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions are now 60% higher than they were in 1990, and we have now put more GHG emissions into the atmosphere since the first IPCC report was released in 1990 (i.e., knowing about the problem) than in all of human history prior… (3/11)
Read 11 tweets
Mar 23
@Bowenchris is so close to getting it.

Just a little bit further to go.

Those hard to abate sectors will need to be wound down.

Let’s start being honest. Offsets should be used to achieve targets over & above the science (>75% reduction for Aus).

🧵
Not to get to inadequate targets (43%). To compensate for our historic emissions and help other countries achieve their targets.

Not to allow environmentally harmful sectors to continue indefinitely.
Perhaps @auspol needs to be briefed on #degrowth? The only mathematically feasible way to limit warming to less than 2 degrees & avoid tipping points in the Earth’s system that will lead to Hothouse Earth.

illuminem.com/illuminemvoice…
Read 5 tweets
Mar 8
Here is the recording of @jasonhickel speaking to the Dutch parliament on the topic of #degrowth earlier today.

It’s been described as a “masterclass in cutting through mainstream myths about the economy”.

Perhaps @StephanieKelton can be invited to speak to the Dutch parliament soon, to help clear up the myth of “the government is a household and needs tax revenue to spend”.
And perhaps @adribuller can talk to the Dutch parliament about how putting a price on everything is absurd.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(