Please be conscientious about which protests for #JordanNeely you attend. It’s a sick, terrible thing but high profile stories of injustice tend to get co-opted by grifts that exploit tragedy to brand build.
I will do my best to vouch and verify before sharing.
In general, some good parameters:
- Is the organizer directly active in the topic at hand?
- If no to the first, is the organizer flying solo or joined in collaboration with multiple groups that focus on the same topic?
Ex: the vigil for Neely yesterday was initiated by a homeless rights activist. Another upcoming protest is organized by multiple housing rights groups.
On-topic organizing groups typically have speakers with firsthand experience, expert knowledge. Off-topic groups speak broadly.
The risk of joining a “bad” protest is that it diverts your energy away from supporting focused efforts and toward spaces just looking to spread their name, which can be discouraging and disincentivize you.
The benefit of attending any protest is that you meet other people.
For clarity, the multiple housing rights groups is an example of a good space, because they’re working in collaboration for a common cause that is related to the work they do.
Forgot to add this is for organizations, not protests organized by friends, peers. Regular folks can and do organize protests, vigils, & other solidarity events!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I ride the subways a lot too and I don’t think people having an episode or who get on the train asking for food & funds “terrorize the entire car.” I just mind my damn business.
Recently was on the train and a guy got on in the midst of an episode, having a heated argument with no one. Passengers freaked out & fled. One sat near me. I pointed out that he was in his own mind, didn’t even know we were there. Suddenly he seemed much less scary to her.
After that moment, she noticeably relaxed into her seat, like her hackles went down, and we chatted casually for a bit about the divestment from mental health resources and the demonization of unhoused people.
The gassing of a people with apparent religious beliefs in 1930s Germany set off powerful reactions, with some calling the gassing a Holocaust and others defending the Third Reich’s actions as a defense against disorder.
To me, an unbiased outlet, these are two equal positions.
I love to do Unbiased Journalism that definitely does not fall for the same tropes that have shown to legitimize and platform the irrational hate of a small few.
Since we’re doing journalism that platforms hatemongery as simply having a relevant opinion, let’s add to this discussion the debate over whether the MTA should provide passengers with their own nooses or simply set up stocks on the platforms anyone can use.
NYC isn’t “bracing for riots.” No riots happened, except from cops.
Yesterday’s vigil was met with heavy police response, antagonism. NYPD Legal even agreed the cops were setting the wrong tone.
A lot of people who were there yesterday haven’t been to a protest, or haven’t been out since 2020 when NYPD was being exceptionally aggressive.
Yesterday was very chaotic but carried some very notable examples of how police set that tone and put people into a terror mindset.
On the platform, for some reason NYPD created a police line on one side. On that line was anti-terrorism cops with flex cuffs, threatening arrest to people trying to access the protest. This was not a coherent police line unless the intent was a kettle, and it freaked people out.
It shouldn’t be difficult for elected officials to not leave the door open for condoning vigilante killings of unhoused people. This waffling rhetoric poses a very real risk in an uptick in targeted violence. That they can’t outright reject it is just unfathomably dangerous.