The Kerala High Court will shortly hear six petitions challenging the release of the movie 'The Kerala Story'. The case will be heard by a division bench of Justices N Nagaresh and Sophy Thomas.
Dave: Films can cause serious damage of innocent minds. this may create a serious public law and order problem. Really, one should view the entire film. The trailer itself shows how dangerous it is.
Dave: One of the best things we have in our country is the Constitution of India. It guarantees rights.. freedom of speech etc. But it is not absolute. This is very important.
"...being persons qualified in the opinion of the Central Government to judge the effect of films on the public, as the Central Government may think fit to appoint thereto."
Court: This is not a historical movie. This is a story.
Dave: If it is a story with a false narrative, court has every right to sit over the censorship board. If fiction is going to create a serious public order situation...
Dave: It is a clear case of 153A.. Dave reads description of trailer.
Court: So what is wrong with it?! It is fiction. In Kerala we are so secular. There is a movie where a pujari spits on an idol and that was welcomed by society.
Court: There are umpteen number of movies where Hindu sanyasis are depicted as smugglers or rapists. Nothing happens, no one protests. Many such Hindi and Malayalam films are there.
Dave reads, "India is a melting pot of civilizations, cultures, religions and languages. Any attempt to vilify a religious community must be viewed with grave disfavour by this Court as the custodian of constitutional values. Its duty to enforce constitutional values demands"
Court: Was it a fictional movie in this petition? I don't think it was a movie..
Dave reads, "It is proved that even though one movie relating to a social issue may not significantly affect the attitude of an individual or group, continual exposure to films of a similar character will produce a change."
Dave: Let us suppose one or two incidents did take place. You must not glorify them this way! You cannot talk about them. You have to let law take its course.
Dave: I also am strong advocate of freedom, but if it likely to create enmity, poison the minds of innocent people it must be curbed. That's what Supreme Court has said since 1950s. Therefore, please stop the telecast.
Senior Advocate George Poonthottam argues: The prayer is to recall the certificate. Normally, it should have been yesterday.. now, either your lordships may see it first..
Court: This is fiction! Merely because some religious head is shown in bad light is not a reason to ban the movie. This has been happening in Hindi and Malayalam movies for a long time!
Adv Shah: Kindly see my reliefs, my contention is that.. offences are attracted and thus, certification is wrong. I filed a complaint. Inciting commission of offence has to be checked by the certifying authority.
#SupremeCourt hears the case of a journalist who was given Talaq e Hasan (triple divorce with gap period) by her advocate husband
Sr Adv Shyam Divan: the husband was asked to be present here and now an affidavit has been filed which has all facts which should be struck off the… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
CJI: But has she been given talaq or not. if she has been given.. she can challenge it.. PIL or not..what is the basis of the challenge?
Sr Adv Divan: this is basically a Article 226 plea which has her issues as well.. it could be a PIL since she has a personal interest as… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
CJI: We will not go into matrimonial disputes here... we are on the challenge to extra judicial divorces.. like talaq e Hasan etc... so you have to withdraw the affidavit with individual facts
#SupremeCourt hears a PIL filed in connection with the current blockade and quit notice imposed or served by the Southern Angami Public Organisation (SAPO) of Nagaland on the Mao Community of Manipur
SG Tushar Mehta: I have received a note from Union Home Ministry. Some people were creating blockades etc.. but that has been withdrawn now... and there is no hindrance of movement at all.
CJI: We thought this is a matter of public order.. govt has said this and if there is any… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Justice Narasimha: the initial problem was Mao people travelling through Kojeri forest... and now MHA says it is resolved but after this also if the problem persists then you can move MHA with individual concerns
#SupremeCourt is hearing the case where it had directed officials of legal services authorities in UP to collate information from district and state prisons on convicts who have become eligible for premature release
Amicus Curiae Gaurav Agarwal: DGP UP may ensure that all details of life convicts in state prisons is filled in online portal, and details entered into software, all details of eligible life convicts be sent to prison authorities and reflects on e prison module #supremecourt
Justice Narasimha: we have to first identify who will take charge of this duty...as in the key officer in charge
Amicus: District Magistrate is the final authority who has the prison report, trial court report and then he makes a decision whether if he is released he or she will… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
The President questions a reporter in court: You people report only where there is TRP. There are so many home buyers who come… Selective reporting.. Madam (court master) take down their numbers, we will call them when there is an important matter.