And have never published a single paper on claspin or BRCA.
So how did they get a patent for a cancer drug that they have never published on, unless they purposefully withheld that finding from the public who fund them?
An assumption here could be that Smythe has been working under public funding, discovered a useful cancer drug, and withheld it from the public so that he could sell it under patent.
I'd like to know if that's an incorrect assumption
DRASTIC was designed to implode. It was deliberate.
Please do not let their infighting (which has been going on for 2 years) under Billy's regime DISTRACT you from what matters...
..that the field of virology took away your human rights
DRASTIC has done excellent work highlighting the origins of the SARS-Cov-2 coronavirus, which was a typical product of "virology research".
But much of that work has been done outside DRASTIC.
Meanwhile DRASTIC continues to endorse mRNA vaccine extremists.
There are members of DRASTIC who I will not highlight at this time but who have very strong links to the NIH and government and the "anti-aging" science community who have driven the mRNA push.
They undermine the genuine members.
They know who they are.
And for the definitive guide on why Holmes is lying about the "animal origins" of a coronavirus that has never transferred across species (despite what the vaccine sellers tell you)
In 2021, the AMA forced doctors and nurses to undertake experimental genetic therapy as a condition of their employment, without any evidence that it would benefit themselves or the public, in direct contravention of the Geneva declaration.
At the same time they used the @theMJA as their mouthpiece to push untested and dangerous COVID vaccine mandates on the population, spurred on by @BenFordhamLive who gave @Prof_NickTalley free reign to push COVID propaganda on the population.
.@Bryce_Nickels I am attacking your group because YOU (@RutgersU) violated the UN declaration of human rights and UNESCO bioethics agreements to force young adults into an experimental gene therapy with long term consequences including the risk of death.
Why is your group full of scientists who have personally profited from dual use research that is a money laundering operation for the pharmaceutical industry and has killed millions?