Thread by @AVSmartz

@goddeketal you see we ARE on the same page.

5-year olds aren't the issue.

"Good, bad, corrupt," scholars, aren't the issue.

The issue truly is on a macro-scale, without any offense intended, just logic, based on your honesty, scholars as a whole. Which over a 3-year period

https://twitter.com/goddeketal/status/1655340928058400768

amounts to #ScientificObservation, providing #MedicalEvidence requiring minimal analysis to conclude that #InstitutionalIndoctrination, (teaching a set of beliefs and behaviors through universities) has lead to observable patterned behaviors among a specific group, in this case

the entire global medical community of millions. One could easily defend #MassFormationPsychosis, is the reason. My meaning for the term is a disconnect from reality, relative to time, in either ending #CrimesAgainstHumanity or normalizing pandemics and mRNA injections as the

government mandated "treatment."

So regardless of which side of the 3-years and running, non-existent debate one chooses to defend the actions among ALL scholars are identical.

However, there is a critical distinction that needs to be taken into account.

One side wins if

they can run the clock out.

And sadly the opposing side doesn't realize there even IS a game clock.

So from the outside looking in - TO A 5-YEAR OLD - both sides are doing the exact same things. It could be as childish and elementary as buying a blue checkmark from a central

authority, (which in first grade we had to earn our gold stars), but I digress, to a full list of easily identifiable behaviors that rarely, if ever, occur in an organized, collective, synchronized and sustained effort over time.

Instead what we identify are millions of

"scholars," seeking recognition, whether right or wrong, presenting peer-reviewed papers for approval from a central authority, in the US it's the NIH and its' $40B dollar taxpayer-funded grant money - to touting their scholarly credentials on social media, testifying to govt,

appearing on and/or launching podcasts, writing articles for the purpose of creating a for-profit, social following, authoring books, traveling to events with like-minded peers, participating in lawsuits and tweeting their disagreements with the opposition without ever

participating in a single #CivilPublicDebate.

Three long years, no end in sight, not a single public debate and scholars have done the exact same thing over and over and over again, from day one without moving the needle one iota in the oppositions' direction. I can't count the

number of times a scholar has stated publicly, "people are finally starting to wake up."

So here is my conclusion, if we continue to leave it to scholars to end these war crimes, and cannot rally and sustainably organize #OrdinaryCitizens we will likely never hold anyone

accountable.

Nuremberg ONLY happened because we went to war. So ask yourself which government is going to step in and put and end to this #MedicalGenocide if not regular old common folk?

It may already be too late - 3 fucking years.

But one thing is for certain if our scholars

just keep doing the same thing over and over, while expecting different results, "eventually" we've already lost. There is no timeline, no coordinated effort, no weaponizing technology to rise up and end this fiasco.

We must force ourselves to #ThinkDifferently and

#ActDifferently if we are to survive.

What I can't understand is why there are literally no scholars with an open mind, willing to try any new approach.

I suppose, to a hammer everything looks like a nail.

@threadreaderapp unroll