Thread by @ClareCraigPath

I have been very busy recently preparing a witness statement for the covid Public Inquiry.

They asked me to share details of deaths in 15-19 year olds males associated with 💉rollout so I had to explain the bigger picture regarding concerns with these 💉.

I said this: 🧵

Feb 2020 Whitty said
“The rate limiting steps are late clinical trials for safety & efficacy, & then manufacturing. For a disease with a low (for the sake of argument 1%) mortality...

telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/03/0…

...a vaccine has to be very safe so the safety studies can’t be shortcut. So important for the long run.”

The belief that vaccines were safe had led to a circular belief that vaccines required fewer safety checks than other novel therapies.

Novel vaccines take a decade or more to go through saefety checks.

Flu vaccines don't.

These novel drugs were treated like flu vaccines for regulatory purposes.

Pharma skipped testing for genotoxicity, carcinotoxicity and even studies showing how much spike is produced, for how long and where in the body it reaches.

They said these studies were “not considered necessary.”

phmpt.org/wp-content/upl…

The trial info sheet said

“Due to the urgent need for a vaccine against Covid-19, with agreement from the MHRA, some of the tests usually required for a newly manufactured vaccine...

...have been modified, in order to make the vaccine available more quickly for assessment.”

uhs.nhs.uk/Media/Southamp…

The regulators let the pharma companies get away with trashing the placebo group after ~2 months by giving them the novel products.

This was despite us knowing that nacrolepsy caused by Pandemrix vaccine took on av 8 months to be diagnosed.

sciencenorway.no/forskningno-no…

AZ issued a press release claiming 100% efficacy against hospitalisation and death after only 2 severe covid hospitalisations and one death in the placebo arm.

This claim was repeated widely and was believed.

astrazeneca.com/media-centre/p…

thelancet.com/journals/lance…

The priority was to protect the old and vulnerable who accounted for 98% of covid deaths.

There were going to be 15 million jabs to freedom.

However, the WHO started a campaign in August 2020 that "no-one is safe until everyone is safe."

This penetrated and 💉 started to be aimed at healthy and ever younger arms.

web.archive.org/web/2020081817…

The manufacturers decided to use the WHOLE chinese spike sequence rather than parts of it, or peptides, which have been shown to be safer for vaccine design.

nature.com/articles/s4154…

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…

Some manufacturers modified the spike so that it could not bind to the receptor and enter a cell.

This might have reduced some harm but the spike was delivered into cells - spike was produced INSIDE the cells in the first place.

AZ did not modify the sequence.

From Nov 2020 it was clear that parts of AZ spike could be shed outside of cells.

nature.com/articles/s4154…

biorxiv.org/content/10.110…

pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.10…

There was total regulatory failure in allowing these products to be given to anyone which was compounded by not withdrawing them promptly once evidence these issues were clinically relevant became clear.

The huge numbers of failings has been set out by @PerseusGroup_ in The Perseus Report.

perseus.org.uk/main-report

To touch on a few points:

Since 2005 there were concerns about the regulator losing "sight of the need to protect and promote public health."

bmj.com/content/377/bm…

The CEO claims the MHRA is now an "enabler" not a "watchdog."

twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

No human studies were carried out to see what happened to the synthetic modified RNA - no-one knows how long it takes to be removed from the body.

There is evidence that in some it lasts between at least 28 days and 4 months in the blood.

https://twitter.com/ClareCraigPath/status/1622609990354599937?s=20

The lipid nanoparticles that devlivers the modified synthetic mRNA is toxic.

This mechanism was shelved in 2016 for conventional gene therapy because of the multiple doses needed.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…

statnews.com/2016/09/13/mod…

It was claimed it could still be used in vaccine technology because that only requires one dose...

The viral vector used for delivering the AstraZeneca DNA message was reported in 2007 to cause platelet activation, which can lead to blood clots.

ashpublications.org/blood/article/…

The Pfizer and Moderna clinical trial data shows a higher rate of serious adverse reactions from vaccine (12.5 per 10,000)

than any reduction in serious events from covid (2.3 and 6.4 per 10,000 for Pfizer and Moderna respectively).

papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…

The adverse reaction alarm system blared red from January 2021.

It was claimed this was due to over reporting because more people were informed about the system.

Over the same time period reports for other drugs did not rise.

The US VAERS reporting system has been forced to release its data which shows signals of harm for 770 conditions 2/3rds of which were a stronger signal than for myocarditis & pericarditis which were acknowledged as a genuine adverse event in mid 2021.

jackanapes.substack.com/p/cdc-finally-…

The spike protein is the most toxic part of the virus.

It damages lungs, vessel walls and causes clots.

tabletmag.com/sections/scien…

Part of the sequence is identical to a region of a bacterial sequence that can bind directly to a particular type of white blood cells resulting in lethal cytokine storms.

pnas.org/content/117/41…

This part of the sequence was heavily mutated in the Omicron variant making it less lethal.

However, even the most recent injections contained the original Chinese spike sequence with this dangerous sequence.

osf.io/bcsa6/

nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…

Because the mechanism of harm is likely to be a combination of impacts on immunity causing autoimmune attack and small vessel damage, it is not surprising that almost every organ system can be affected.

And small vessel damage was not rare:

https://twitter.com/RetsefL/status/1654234796527173632?s=20

It has been difficult to measure the adverse reactions from the vaccines for three separate reasons: some were uncommon, some were slow to emerge and the risk was not present in every batch of vaccine.

Rare side effects like the brain clots and myocarditis are easier to be sure about because the impact on total numbers of those rare conditions is large.

hartgroup.org/myocarditis-be…

Potential adverse reactions like, say, heart attacks or strokes, are so common normally after a certain age, that it would be very difficult to prove a cause, even if it were real, on an individual level.

Certain batches of vaccine have had a much higher adverse reaction and death rate than others. A Danish study showed the rates of reports per dose fell into three categories of batch with high, medium or low adverse events.

trialsitenews.com/a/hot-lots-of-…

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ec…

One batch of Pfizer-BioNTech resulted in the hospitalisation of 120 children in Vietnam.

e.vnexpress.net/news/news/120-…

MHRA said they would do a prospective survey of adverse events but never reported on it.

A German survey of 500,000 people showed events that led to hospitalisation, life changing disability or death in 1 in 142 people, for AstraZeneca and 1 in 500 for Pfizer/BioNTech.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

Those will include a small number of genuine coincidences.

Reports filed by German doctors put the figure for serious reactions at 1 in 3,300 by September 2022.

pei.de/EN/newsroom/do…

The thread is broken.

Whole thing is here:

threadreaderapp.com/thread/1655491…