🚨NEW STUDY🚨
"Six models are used in a recent study to analyze the climatic, environmental & socio-economic consequences of #overshooting a C budget consistent with the 1.5°C temp target along the cause-effect chain from emissions & #CarbonRemovals to climate risks & impact."
🧵
"Global climatic indicators such as CO2-concentration and mean temperature closely follow the #CarbonBudget#overshoot with mid-century peaks of 50 ppmv and 0.35°C, respectively."
2/10
Findings of this study highlight that "investigating #overshoot scenarios requires temporally and spatially differentiated analysis of climate, environmental and socioeconomic systems."
3/10
Researchers find "persistent and spatially heterogeneous differences in the distribution of #carbon across various pools, ocean heat content, sea-level rise as well as #economic damages."
4/10
"Moreover, it was find in the study that key impacts, including degradation of marine ecosystem, heat wave exposure & economic damages, are more severe in equatorial areas than in higher latitudes, although absolute #temperature changes are stronger in higher latitudes."
5/10
"The detrimental effects of a 1.5 °C warming and the additional effects due to #overshoots are strongest in non-OECD countries (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development)."
6/10
"Constraining the overshoot inflates CO2 prices, thus shifting #CarbonRemoval towards early #afforestation while reducing the total cumulative deployment only slightly, while mitigation costs increase sharply in #DevelopingCountries."
7/10
"Thus, scenarios with C budget overshoots can reverse global mean temp increase but imply more persistent & geographically heterogeneous impacts. Overall, the decision about #overshooting implies more severe trade-offs btw #mitigation & impacts in #DevelopingCountries."
8/10
Read the study led by @NB_pik entitled: "Exploring risks and benefits of overshooting a 1.5 °C carbon budget over space and time" here ⬇️ iopscience.iop.org/article/10.108…
🚨A new @EarthsFutureEiC study tests an Arctic intervention: flooding winter sea ice with seawater to see if it can become thicker, brighter, and more resistant to summer melt.
The answer comes from a real field experiment in the Canadian Arctic.🧵1/11
2/ The experiment was conducted in Cambridge Bay, Nunavut (Canadian Arctic) using a ~1 km² sea-ice field site.
Researchers divided the ice into control plots (no flooding) and treated plots (artificial flooding) to directly compare outcomes under identical conditions.
3/Process:
•Seawater was pumped from ocean
•Spread manually/with equipment over ice surface during winter
•H2O rapidly froze due to sub-zero air temp
•Process repeated in some plots multiple times over winter
Each flooding cycle added new frozen layer on top of existing ice
🚨Monthly Solar Geoengineering Updates (April'2026)🚨
From EU calls for an #SRM deployment moratorium & WHO-linked health-centered governance report, to Stardust publishing its own SRM rules, key SRM headlines you need to know from past month:
🔗
The private SRM company publishes voluntary rules and safety guidelines, but experts raise concerns over transparency, unknown aerosols, and private control of planetary-scale interventions.
1/12
2️⃣ WHO-linked report calls for health-centered SRM governance:
A pre-print urges SRM governance centred on human health, equity, and Global South inclusion, stressing SRM must never replace emissions cuts (“non-substitution” principle).
🚨Is direct air capture (#DAC) really worth the investment?
A new Nature Climate Change study shows that investing in wind & solar delivers 2-3× greater combined climate + health benefits than direct air capture across most U.S. regions, under the same budget.
Details🧵1/11
2/ DAC is often promoted as essential for net-zero, removing CO₂ directly from the atm. But most studies assess it in isolation, asking: “Does it work?”
This study asks a policy-relevant question:
“What are we giving up by funding DAC instead of alternatives?”
3/ Researchers modelled cost-equivalent investments across 22 U.S. regions (2020–2050), comparing:
Direct Air Capture vs Utility-scale wind & solar
Critically, they evaluated CO₂ reductions + air pollution + health impacts.
🚨What happens to tropical rainforests as CO₂ rises?
New research shows higher CO₂ boosts tree growth & C uptake by pushing roots to aggressively mine scarce phosphorus.
This strengthens the C sink now, but depletes nutrients, ultimately limiting long-term C storage.🧵1/11
2/ Scientists tested this in the Amazon by exposing forest patches to higher CO₂ (future-like conditions) and tracking how trees, roots, and soils responded over time.
3/ Step 1: More CO₂ → faster photosynthesis
Trees produce more sugars, grow faster, and pull more CO₂ out of the air.