🚨NEW STUDY🚨
"Six models are used in a recent study to analyze the climatic, environmental & socio-economic consequences of #overshooting a C budget consistent with the 1.5°C temp target along the cause-effect chain from emissions & #CarbonRemovals to climate risks & impact."
🧵
"Global climatic indicators such as CO2-concentration and mean temperature closely follow the #CarbonBudget#overshoot with mid-century peaks of 50 ppmv and 0.35°C, respectively."
2/10
Findings of this study highlight that "investigating #overshoot scenarios requires temporally and spatially differentiated analysis of climate, environmental and socioeconomic systems."
3/10
Researchers find "persistent and spatially heterogeneous differences in the distribution of #carbon across various pools, ocean heat content, sea-level rise as well as #economic damages."
4/10
"Moreover, it was find in the study that key impacts, including degradation of marine ecosystem, heat wave exposure & economic damages, are more severe in equatorial areas than in higher latitudes, although absolute #temperature changes are stronger in higher latitudes."
5/10
"The detrimental effects of a 1.5 °C warming and the additional effects due to #overshoots are strongest in non-OECD countries (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development)."
6/10
"Constraining the overshoot inflates CO2 prices, thus shifting #CarbonRemoval towards early #afforestation while reducing the total cumulative deployment only slightly, while mitigation costs increase sharply in #DevelopingCountries."
7/10
"Thus, scenarios with C budget overshoots can reverse global mean temp increase but imply more persistent & geographically heterogeneous impacts. Overall, the decision about #overshooting implies more severe trade-offs btw #mitigation & impacts in #DevelopingCountries."
8/10
Read the study led by @NB_pik entitled: "Exploring risks and benefits of overshooting a 1.5 °C carbon budget over space and time" here ⬇️ iopscience.iop.org/article/10.108…
🚨Monthly Solar Geoengineering Updates (April'2026)🚨
From EU calls for an #SRM deployment moratorium & WHO-linked health-centered governance report, to Stardust publishing its own SRM rules, key SRM headlines you need to know from past month:
🔗
The private SRM company publishes voluntary rules and safety guidelines, but experts raise concerns over transparency, unknown aerosols, and private control of planetary-scale interventions.
1/12
2️⃣ WHO-linked report calls for health-centered SRM governance:
A pre-print urges SRM governance centred on human health, equity, and Global South inclusion, stressing SRM must never replace emissions cuts (“non-substitution” principle).
🚨Is direct air capture (#DAC) really worth the investment?
A new Nature Climate Change study shows that investing in wind & solar delivers 2-3× greater combined climate + health benefits than direct air capture across most U.S. regions, under the same budget.
Details🧵1/11
2/ DAC is often promoted as essential for net-zero, removing CO₂ directly from the atm. But most studies assess it in isolation, asking: “Does it work?”
This study asks a policy-relevant question:
“What are we giving up by funding DAC instead of alternatives?”
3/ Researchers modelled cost-equivalent investments across 22 U.S. regions (2020–2050), comparing:
Direct Air Capture vs Utility-scale wind & solar
Critically, they evaluated CO₂ reductions + air pollution + health impacts.
🚨What happens to tropical rainforests as CO₂ rises?
New research shows higher CO₂ boosts tree growth & C uptake by pushing roots to aggressively mine scarce phosphorus.
This strengthens the C sink now, but depletes nutrients, ultimately limiting long-term C storage.🧵1/11
2/ Scientists tested this in the Amazon by exposing forest patches to higher CO₂ (future-like conditions) and tracking how trees, roots, and soils responded over time.
3/ Step 1: More CO₂ → faster photosynthesis
Trees produce more sugars, grow faster, and pull more CO₂ out of the air.
🚨Green roofs + enhanced rock weathering (#ERW) could turn cities into carbon sinks.
A new assessment finds Europe’s rooftops could remove tens of millions of tonnes of CO₂ by 2060, with global potential reaching hundreds of MtCO₂/yr under ideal conditions.
Details🧵1/12
2/ The work is a conceptual, literature-based assessment combined with geochemical scaling.
It estimates CO₂ removal using theoretical maximum reactivity (100% mineral conversion) and extrapolates across urban roof availability in Europe and globally.
3/ Roof availability is a key input:
The study uses estimates that roofs cover ~30–32% of urban land area, and up to ~50% of impervious surfaces in dense cities, highlighting a large, currently underused surface for carbon removal deployment.
🚨A new study details that the climate value of algae & cyanobacteria lies not in CO₂ uptake alone, but in their capacity to generate long-lived, chemically recalcitrant C compounds, such as algaenan & carbonates that may contribute to durable sequestration pathways.
🧵1/11
2/ The study adopts a conceptual synthesis framework, integrating biochemical & geochemical evidence to examine carbon fate post-photosynthetic fixation, moving beyond uptake rates to study the thermodynamic and structural persistence of biogenic carbon.
3/ It constructs a functional distinction between:
1) Labile carbon fractions, which are rapidly cycled through microbial respiration
2) Recalcitrant fractions, which resist degradation & contribute to long-term carbon storage across terrestrial & marine systems.
🚨🗞️Monthly Solar Geoengineering Updates (March'26 Edition)🗞️🚨
From UN review of #SRM tech & its human rights impacts, to US organizations resisting SRM bans, plus new tools & research awards – SRM headlines you need to know from the past month:🧵1/13
1️⃣ @OHCHR_MENA seeks input on climate technologies - The UN Human Rights Office is collecting submissions on how SRM & CDR may impact human rights, with a report due later this year.
2/13
2️⃣ US National Security Framing – ACCF report urges federal research and international governance to prevent rivals from gaining strategic advantage.