We have already seen the high levels of mental and physical health issues, including suicides, which existing substandard accommodation cause. The use of a cramped, rusting, barge will only increase these issues and put more people's lives at risk. #r4today 1/
Rather than continuing to waste money on cruel and inhumane policies, this government needs to start investing in the asylum system to process claims faster, and into communities to ensure everyone is supported, locals and asylum seekers alike. 2/
At some point this government, or the next, needs to recognise that policies of "deterrence" have been conclusively proven not to work, and in fact escalate exploitation. That means they are going to have to start actually putting money into the system to make it work. 3/
It is estimated that last year it would have cost roughly £20million to process the backlog. That is a fraction of the cost of all these unworkable policies being thrown around. It isn't just more humane, and legal, to have policies of protection. It is more cost effective. 4/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Thread. As the #RefugeeBanBill faces scrutiny from the Lords today the Home Secretary and Justice Secretary have taken one of their pet papers to spread yet more misinformation. 1/ #r4today thetimes.co.uk/article/b37b29…
First things first. Asylum and refugees are only mentioned once in the Conservative 2019 Manifesto. As opposed to being a "manifesto commitment, the #RefugeeBanBill would directly contravene the only one they made. 2/ conservatives.com/our-plan/conse…
The Home and Justice Secretaries appear to be deliberately misleading people by conflating the immigration and asylum systems. None of this is exactly correct. Costs involved have been inflated by this government, not number of people seeking asylum, which it's legal to do so. 3/
These numbers are very low. The bigger issue is how they show that even when the government has resettlement routes on paper they are so inadequate people are forced to use irregular means to seek asylum in the UK. 2/
This government is desperate to create the idea that UK has a problem with people seeking asylum. It's scraping the barrel to do so though. What is guaranteed is the #RefugeeBanBill will make things worse by denying people the only option many have to seek asylum in the UK. 3/
Thread: As it is #StGeorgesDay allow me a little rant. Not about where St George was from or any of that stuff, but about right now. The last time I wore these cufflinks was at an embassy dinner in the middle of a conflict more than a decade ago .1/
I am a mongrel, I am happy to admit that. I can celebrate St Andrew's, St David, hell even Saint Denis. There is nothing wrong in that, or celebrating the patron saint of your country. 2/
You know what affects me? It is that I feel embarrassed to wear those cufflinks. Why? Not because of "woke lefties". But because of the way the cross has been coopted by nasty little xenophobic far right pillocks, who don't speak for this country. 3/
In 2002 there were nearly 10,000 more asylum applications than in 2022, yet the rate for initial decisions dropped from 99% to 25% over the same period. @ZoeJardiniere is spot on. The current situation is one of the government's own making to create a perpetual scapegoat. 1/
It is also worth noting that this was nothing to do with capacity. The number of caseworkers processing claims actually rose from 260 in the year ending March 2016 to 640 at the same point in 2022. What happened was that the actual processing slowed down. 2/
For example, during the period of March to March 2016 to 2022 the number of people waiting more than 6 months for a decision rose from 8,278 to 72,597. That's a big jump when you have more people processing claims unless something else is going on. 3/
The phrase "internment camps" rightly conjures horrific images, yet, in a purely factual sense, that is exactly what the UK government is proposing to implement. Due to additional factors, they are planning camps to detain individuals indefinitely without criminal charges. 1/
There is nothing illegal about seeking asylum, and, indeed, both international and domestic law recognises that not only may they use irregular means to seek it, they can also cross multiple countries when doing so. 2/
You obviously cannot return people to countries where they face threat to their life, and the mere fact that the vast majority of those seeking asylum in the UK receive it shows that they do. 3/
It doesn't matter if an asylum seeker is from Afghanistan, Albania or anywhere else. Without making it safer and simpler to access the asylum system, something voted down yesterday multiple times, it remains inevitable "deterrents" will increase exploitation. 1/ #RefugeeBanBill
All this bill does is increase the ability of traffickers to prey upon people, including children. It doesn't offer alternative ways to seek asylum in the UK. It doesn't tackle gangs at source. It doesn't make processing asylum claims faster and more efficient. 2/ #StopTheBill
It's performance politics. Multiple studies, including the @ukhomeoffice' own analysis show that not only do deterrents and harsher asylum policies not reduce people using irregular routes, they actually increase the number, and the number of people who are exploited. 3/