@RaiderMatt5204 1) As were all. But you know what? if you look closely at his margin of error---which is all any pollster can provide---he was 100% accurate. All we want to hear are Ws and Ls, but pollsters only give you a range, and he is still the most accurate.
@RaiderMatt5204 2) But I'll play. To my knowlege there isn't a single poll out there showing RDS beating Trump for the nomination. They all magically and mysteriously jump to a general, which won't happen.
ALL pollsters have Trump over RDS 20-40, ditto every state except FL and GA.
@RaiderMatt5204 3) And I'll play more: the book "The Great Revolt" by Salena Zito, which no RDSer has even read, interviewed thousands of Trump voters in 2017-18.
They found that a very sizeable group of these (in the neighborhood of 10-15%) had never voted before or hadn't voted in last 3.
@RaiderMatt5204 4) This wasn't just polling: they followed up with a very large sample of interviews (replicated elsewhere in "Bellwether Blues" about Ohio's undervote).
5) They found that this undervote group was not R, was not D. They HATED both parties. Didn't vote McTurd or Minion or W.
6) But they love Trump. They came out 2x for him, but him only: note OH Vance race, a MAGA guy, underperformed Trump in 2022; R Johnson, a MAGA guy, underperformed Trump in 2022---but they both won. But non-MAGA (Kelly in WI, Laxalt who backed away, Oz) all lost
7) Baris, Zito, others all found these people will not come out in a midterm & vote for Rs.
They only come out if one man, Trump, is on the ballot.
8) I extrapolated the #s from the 2020 Trump vote. This means he brings out 10-12m who otherwise WILL NOT BE THERE.
9) So where does anyone else make this # up? No one, especially Girdusky, can answer this. It is NOT with "suburbs." First, white working class women and white married women vote Trump, regardless of location. Second, Hispanics and blacks disproportionately vote Trump over RDS.
10) More important, the @1 supporter of abortion and the @1 suburban voters are not WOMEN but white college educated men. So, yeah, RDS will get "some" of them---but nowhere near 10-12m.
11) Lastly, there is no indication whatsover that RDS can appeal to Ds in midwest. Zero.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. This was Ron's terrible, horrible, not-very-good week.
2. First, there was a Palm Beach donor dinner where one said "the brakes are pumped" on RDS.
3. Then came the "Panic Performance" in Japan where he had the bobble-head & wild eyes.
4. Then came the British business luncheon where "Politico" described him as "DeTedious" and busnesses called the performance "horrendous" and "low wattage."
5. All that came on top of last week's donors confab where major BigBucks backed out, some going straight to Trump.
6. I haven't even mentioned the polling. RDS's insider pollster can concoct a NATIONAL poll presumably showing him leading the Rutabaga, but can't produce one single state poll showing him beating Trump.
7) Meanwhile the Trumpster had solid TV shows everywhere.
1) This is something we all need to remember. Politics is politics. If you are "nice" & "civil" you get utterly stomped on.
2) American politics have ALWAYS been uncivil. A man threatened to beat James Monroe with his walking stick in the Oval Office.
3) In 1936, FDR mercilessly ladled out money in specific districts only to beat Rs. In the 1960 primary, JFK's dad did the same thing to fellow Ds.
4) Name calling, jibes, these are nothing. Just part of the rough and tumble.
5) Personally, I don't want a sissy who can't take some body slams & get back up. Of course, NO ONE has been hit as hard as Trump. I'm waiting to see Kathy Giffold hold up RDS's severed head.
6) While I appreciate the strategy of RDS hiding as a "non-candidate" while campaiging
1) @Barnes_Law and Viva talked at length about these pending cases. First, NY:
Barnes is steadfast that Boast n Bragg must bring an indictment. Thinks MAYBE some of the professionals--yes, libtoids but pro lawyers--think the case is dog poop & oppose.
@barnes_law 1) contd . . . however, he thinks Bragg will still almost be forced to bring the indict. (Pros know it's incredibly weak & will likely lose).
2) Barnes thinks the civil trial going forward will be a different matter--Trump's lawyers didn't even challenge an anonymous jury move.
@barnes_law 3) He thought that was a mistake--that court may have ignored the objection, but still should have objected.
4) Penalty would be almost insignificant to Trump, but would be media fodder.
5) He sees a host of cases emanating from MN's transoid sanctuary state law.
1) I gave this some thought. I do not think DeSantis was the original choice of the cabal. First, FL is a GOP lock. He brought nothing to the electoral college. Second, he was extremely effective as a gov, but was just starting his second term. I think they wanted him for 28.
2) Instead, I think the plan was to run Doug Ducey of Arizona--now a "swing" state. He had won by something like 13 points, was in his second term, and had made no critical missteps . . . 3) Until the China Virus. Then his lockdowns shattered the GOP populist/business alliance.
4) By siding with the corporate interests against small business bars, restaurants, health clubs, and a myriad of other small businesses, Ducey killed his chance for higher office. 5) That was seen in the leadup to the Senate primaries, when his name was floated to ZERO interest
1) For those who think politics today is "less civil" than in the past:
*In 1824, William Crawford visited Pres. James Monroe at the White House over a matter. They disagreed, tempers flared, and Crawford raised his walking stick as if to hit Monroe, calling him a . . .
1) contd . . . "Damned infernal old scoundrel." As Crawford advanced, Monroe grabbed the tongs from the fireplace, called Crawford a name, and threatened to ring for the servants to have him removed. 2) In 1837, on the floor of the Arkansas House, a fight over allowing . . .
2) contd . . . wolf pelts to be accepted as currency resulted in the Speaker of the House pulling a knife out and killing a representative on the spot. 3) Of course, Cong. Preston Brooks nearly caned Senator Charles Sumner to death on the Senate floor in 1856. 4) Well into . . .