This graph, mislabelled, misleadingly sourced, and not crediting its so-called "estimates" to @CPSThinkTank, is an embarrassment even by the standards of the Telegraph.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Yes, @FraserNelson is actually claiming that @FullFact -and others who point out falsehoods from politicians and the media - are a threat to free speech.
Amusingly, @FraserNelson's views here about fact-checking didn't stop him trying to get me to withdraw an entirely accurate claim I made about him. I offered to bet him £1,000, but of course he didn't take the bet..
I see @FraserNelson is now claiming the article doesn't say what both the headline and the text very plainly say. As usual, doubling down on his dishonesty..
It is worth reading this from Robert Jenrick to get a sense of how far the Conservative Party (or at least the current governing faction) has fallen, intellectually, morally and legally.
@JoshuaNevett There's a strong consensus among credible independent economists (as well as BoE, OBR & off-the-record HMT) that the economic impact of Brexit has and will continue to be negative. There is, a legitimate debate about *how* negative and the data and evidence will change over time
On immigration, as I've written many times, the consensus *has* changed and it's reasonable to argue that the impact isn't negative - although it's early days yet. But that doesn't change the overall balance.
On trade, they note the underperformance of UK trade compared to other advanced economies, and conclude there's no reason to change their view (based on a review of external forecasts) that Brexit will reduce trade volumes by 15%
On investment, bad news: they originally thought Brexit-related uncertainty would have only a relatively small and transitory negative impact. They now think things are worse - a larger negative impact, lasting for longer. (3/5)
On January 31, 2020, the UK left the EU. 3 years on, what have we learned?
3 key takeaways below..
1. Brexit has, as economists predicted, reduced UK trade and investment.
Only a small, increasingly shrill, fringe group dispute this, although there’s lots of scope for debate about how large the impacts are. My evidence to the Lords EAC summarises:
2. The new post-Brexit migration system has reduced migration from the EU but increased it from outside, leading to big sectoral shifts. Immigration overall has risen, although much of this is one-off. My new research with @johnspringford
Happy New Year! The 2023 Financial Times' economists survey is here:
"The UK will face one of the worst recessions and weakest recoveries in the G7 in 2023, as households pay a heavy price for the government’s policy failings"