"The discussion of energy consumption for cryogenic & combined #DirectAirCapture systems is explored in the newly published thesis."๐๏ธ
Details are discussed in a๐งตโฌ๏ธ
1/10
In this novel approach, "a thermodynamic model was constructed using psychometric theories to model the #desublimation of CO2 in a #DAC system. The system was modeled
to include a precooling heat exchanger & a deposition chamber where the desublimation
of CO2 occurs."
2/10
3๏ธโฃ base systems studied:
๐ธ NC (no precompression/turbine recovery)
๐ธPC (precompression only)
๐ธTR (precompression & turbine recovery)
at 3๏ธโฃ different compression ratios, n=400, 800 & 2000.
Then, a combination #DAC system, PSA, was modeled."
3/10
"A dual-column, 4๏ธโฃ-step Skarstrom Cycle PSA (pressure swing adsorption & cryogenic distillation) unit was analyzed using Extended Langmuir Models & the
ideal gas law to simulate a CO2 conc. prior to the deposition chamber. The NC & PSA systems were assessed at Tamb= -50โฆC."
4/10
This study finds that "while increasing the compression ratio of the system, there is no net energy benefit when capturing CO2 given the current state-of-the-art in commercial compressor & #cryocooler capabilities."
5/10
"The assessment of the efficiency of a precooler versus TR finds that it is more advantageous to utilize a heat exchanger precooler than precompression with turbine recovery in a #DAC system. Combining DAC systems may yield a more efficient system."
6/10
"PSA combined with cryogenic capture is less energy intensive than cryogenic capture alone. In a combined #DAC system with PSA and cryogenic distillation,
the PSA unit has a significantly lower energy consumption than the #cryocooler."
7/10
"Increasing the concentration of CO2 entering the deposition chamber significantly decreases the required energy consumption of the #cryocooler."
8/10
Read the complete #Doctoral#Thesis entitled: "Atmospheric Carbon Capture: A Review on Current Technologies and Analysis of Energy Consumption for Various Direct Air Capture (DAC) Systems" here โฌ๏ธ commons.erau.edu/edt/728/
๐จNew study finds #biochar made from bioenergy crops & residues in China could remove up to 1.88 GtCOโ/yr with optimized plant logistics and dedicated biomass.
At ~$10/tCOโ, far cheaper than #BECCS, it offers a scalable, cost-effective carbon removal (#CDR) pathway.
๐งต1/13
2/ Biochar, a carbon-rich solid produced by pyrolysis of biomass, locks carbon into soils for decades to centuries while improving soil quality and crop yields.
Its stability makes it a promising negative emissions technology (NET) relied on in climate scenarios.
3/ The authors evaluate a hybrid system called BCBE, biochar production with biomass supply from dedicated bioenergy crops grown on abandoned cropland, plus agricultural and forestry residues.
This aims to reduce competition with food production.
From U.S. withdrawal from global climate bodies & anti-geoengineering bills, to SAI uncertainty tool, Arctic field trials & funding calls, SRM stayed at the nexus of sci & geopolitics.
Top 10 SRM Highlights (Jan'26)๐งต1/11
1๏ธโฃ ๐จ.๐ฆ. ๐ฒ๐ ๐ถ๐๐ ๐จ๐ก๐๐๐๐ & ๐๐ฃ๐๐ - Experts warn withdrawal could weaken SRM governance, deepen geopolitical mistrust, and accelerate fragmented or unilateral approaches.
2/11
2๏ธโฃ ๐๐ป๐๐ถ-๐ด๐ฒ๐ผ๐ฒ๐ป๐ด๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฏ๐ถ๐น๐น๐ ๐ถ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐จ.๐ฆ. - New Arizona and Iowa state proposals target geoengineering, despite limited evidence and no active SRM programs.
๐จClimate pathways to 1.5ยฐC increasingly depend on land-intensive carbon dioxide removal (#CDR) like forestation and BECCS.
But new research shows these climate solutions could place major pressure on #biodiversity if deployed without safeguards.
Details๐งต1/11
2/ Using five integrated assessment models, the study examines where large-scale CDR is projected to occur & and how often it overlaps with biodiversity hotspots and climate refugia, the places most critical for species survival.
3/ The analysis focuses on a moderate but realistic deployment level of 6 GtCOโ per year:
โข 3 GtCOโ/yr from forestation
โข 3 GtCOโ/yr from BECCS
Even at this level, land pressures are already significant.
๐จThe Politics of Geoengineering (book) is out, offering 1st comprehensive social science view of #geoengineering.
It examines political, legal, economic & societal dimensions of CDR & SRM, from Africa to the Asia-Pacific, amid urgent governance & ethical debates
Chapters๐งต1/15
2/ Chapter 01: Geoengineering has shifted from theory to contested policy, with technology outpacing governance. The analysis highlights political, legal, economic, and justice dimensions and calls for urgent global oversight.
3/ Chapter 2 examines Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) as geoengineering, analyzing CO2 extraction, storage, and conversion, with SWOT insights on techniques and implications for sustainable climate action.
๐จIs carbon dioxide removal (#CDR) in the Arctic really feasible?
A new peer-reviewed study systematically assessed proposed Arctic CDR pathways and finds that feasibility is far more limited than often assumed.
DETAILS๐งต1/14
2/ As Arctic warms rapidly (4x) & attracts attention for climate interventions, can it host CDR at meaningful scale?
To answer this, authors conducted a comparative assessment of major CDR approaches proposed for Arctic regions, spanning both nature-based & engineered methods.
3/ The analysis draws on existing empirical studies, pilot projects, and modeling literature, evaluating each CDR pathway against biophysical constraints, technical readiness, environmental risks, and governance requirements.
๐จ2025 Year in Review: Solar Geoengineering Edition๐จ
As we enter 2026, weโre excited to share our yearly summary for #SRM: "Solar Geoengineering in 2025: Rays of Hope, Clouds of Doubt."
Hereโs what we cover in this comprehensive review:๐งต1/11
2/ ๐๐ก๐๐ญโ๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐๐ฅ๐ฎ๐๐๐ ๐ข๐ง ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐๐๐5 ๐ซ๐๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ฐ?
1๏ธโฃ Rising Temp & Escalating Climate Impacts
2๏ธโฃSRM Funding Announcements
3๏ธโฃTop SRM Stories
4๏ธโฃRestrictions & Bans on SRM
5๏ธโฃEssential SRM Reads
6๏ธโฃSRM in Media
7๏ธโฃResearch Highlights
8๏ธโฃOur Work Across Geoengineering
3/ 2025 was the third-warmest yr on record. @CopernicusEU shows the last 11 yrs were the warmest ever, with the global average temp in yrs 2023-25 exceeding 1.5 ยฐC. Top climate disasters caused $120B+ in losses, intensifying debates over mitigation, CDR & SRM.