Share this page!

Enter Twitter Thread URL to Unroll

Needs to be the full URL like: https://twitter.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on Twitter App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Ryan Goodman Profile picture
@rgoodlaw
May 15 • 3 tweets • 3 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
1/ Cut through the hype and cut to the chase of the #DurhamReport:

Durham says it would have been a "sensible step" for the FBI to open Crossfire Hurricane as a preliminary investigation.

It comes way at the end — page 295.👇

I just discussed w/@ErinBurnett @OutFrontCNN. Image
2. Dovetails with what DOJ Inspector General testified in December 2019.

DOJ IG found sufficient basis for opening full investigation.

Durham publicly suggested he disagreed.

BUT IG Horowitz explained Durham actually AGREED was sufficient basis to open prelim investigation.👇 Image
3. Also if FBI opened a preliminary investigation, it would have surely moved to a full investigation.

Rather than confirmation bias, lots of evidence of contacts with Russian agents etc. Indeed Mueller investigation ended up finding all of these (1-14)👇
justsecurity.org/63838/guide-to… ImageImage

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Ryan Goodman

Ryan Goodman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rgoodlaw

Ryan Goodman Profile picture
May 4
Important victory for accountability, for historical record, for democracy.

Proud Boys conviction for seditious conspiracy to keep former President Trump in power.

The white supremacist paramilitary group would not have taken these actions without Trump’s messaging.
2. Enormous victory on Count 1 seditious conspiracy.

BANG

3. What about possible coordination with Trump allies like Alex Jones?

J6 Select Committee Final Report:

“Records for Enrique Tarrio’s phone show that while the attack on the Capitol was ongoing, he texted with Jones three times and [Jones’ colleague] Shroyer five times.”
Read 4 tweets
Ryan Goodman Profile picture
May 3
Breaking new and just discussed live @OutFrontCNN:

Special Counsel investigating possible tampering with Mar-a-Lago surveillance video.

That would be obstruction on steroids.

@kpolantz @PaulaReidCNN scoop.👇

<Thread> ...
cnn.com/2023/05/03/pol…
2. Note: 18 USC § 1519 - Destruction, alteration of records in federal investigation gets up to 20 years imprisonment.

(@elliotcwilliams just pointed that out in our discussion with @PamelaBrownCNN.

Justice Department cited § 1519 in MAL search warrant.
3. If Trump or others were found responsible for altering Mar-a-Lago surveillance tapes, it could also be a significant aggravating factor pushing DOJ toward Espionage Act indictment.

Would make MAL case more egregious than past cases brought for retention of defense information
Read 6 tweets
Ryan Goodman Profile picture
May 1
I'm thrilled we have recovered 33 of the expert statements submitted to the #January6th Select Committee.

Addressing the state of U.S. democracy and political violence.

All now publicly available @just_security.

Read Introduction by @jhglick here.👇

justsecurity.org/86298/introduc…
2. Jacob Glick's synthesis of the expert statements is its own wake up call.

A threat assessment for U.S. democracy with white Christian nationalism and anti-government violent extremism, and political leaders willing to exploit. Also places United States within global trends.
3. The extraordinary list of experts includes (alphabetically 1-8):

@ProfCAnderson
@ADL
@heidibeirich
@kathleen_belew
@ruthbenghiat
@johncarey03755
@GretchenHlmk
@BrendanNyhan
Susan Stokes (@UChicago)
@AntheaButler
@kcarterjackson

justsecurity.org/86298/introduc… Image
Read 7 tweets
Ryan Goodman Profile picture
Apr 29
Inroads

Re: Special Counsel investigation into Jan. 6th Big Lie fundraising

"The Justice Department, with its ability to bring criminal charges, has been able to prompt more extensive cooperation from a number of witnesses" compared to select committee.

nytimes.com/2023/04/28/us/…
2. The NYT reporting is by @maggieNYT @alanfeuer @jonathanvswan

I happened to speak with @ErinBurnett @OutFrontCNN on Friday about this part of the criminal case.

It potentially sweeps in several Campaign/RNC officials who, with criminal jeopardy, have reason to cooperate.
3. As discussed @CNN, this part of the criminal case is bolstered by new reporting that outside firms -- hired by Trump Campaign itself -- reported to the campaign that all the election fraud claims were bogus.

Most recent scoop on that from @jdawsey1👇

washingtonpost.com/nation/2023/04…
Read 5 tweets
Ryan Goodman Profile picture
Apr 28
I spoke with @ErinBurnett @OutFrontCNN about potential significance of Pence testimony before grand jury.

All Pence needs to do is repeat — under oath — what’s in his book, and it’s impactful.

Here are some examples from the book (hat tip: @thomasjoscelyn’s research)…
<thread>
2. Exhibit one.

From Pence's book (and now presumably under oath):

In Jan 5 Oval Office meeting with Trump, the VP insists the Constitution does not give him authority to interfere with the certification.

Trump counters: "You want to play by Marquess of Queensberry rules." Image
3. Exhibit two.

From Pence's book (and now presumably under oath):

Pence tells Trump he opposed (bonkers) lawsuit by Rep. Gohmert because Pence did not believe he had constitutional authority to reject electoral votes.

Trump replies: "You're too honest." Image
Read 8 tweets
Ryan Goodman Profile picture
Apr 20
I wrote this with @AWeissmann_

We unpack a theme that cuts across Dominion v Fox and People of NY v Trump.

How media companies - Fox in 2020 and National Enquirer in 2016 - were deployed for a political campaign. What can and can't be done about it.

theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
2. A notable similarity:

Judge in Dominion case ruled against Fox's claim that it was just reporting the news.

Less well known: FEC determined the National Enquirer/AMI was not covered by "press exemption" and, by its own admissions, company violated campaign finance laws.👇 Image
3. As an aside: that determination by Federal Election Commission nonpartisan staff is highly relevant to Manhattan DA Bragg's indictment.

It is further support for the claim that the 2016 hush-money scheme violated federal campaign finance law.

link: justsecurity.org/wp-content/upl… Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Send Email!

:(