PCAST: Discussion of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Enabling Science and AI Impacts on Society
"Inflection point" Image
"LLMs are just the beginning" ImageImage
...and coming for the physical world Image
"AI can augment humans" [starting asking: which ones and why? WB] Image
"Profound social impact" - propagate issues we had for centuries [well beyond known biases: important but not a red herring] Image
...and then "free-riding" ;-) on work done by the European Commission back in 2018 Image
Big issues indeed: industry dominates AI talent acquisition and development; consolidation of industry dominance also because of the necessary computation needs (latter was a hot topic in Teramo last week as well 😉dropbox.com/s/rh7ued1ho2wh…] Image
That “What can we do” Q. - I guess the A very much depends on whom you ask [public-minded innovation sure but incentives? The Chat helping you out when cancelling your NYTimes sub is a bad example IMHO bc similar dark patterns should just be banned under consumer protection law] Image
“I think we need to rethink what we want from AI, which is inseparable from rethinking AI” @DAcemogluMIT Image
[The most down-to-earth concerns about AI heard so far came from guess whom? An economist!]
Humans v. Big Tech’s business models and dystopian LLM visions? Image
[Agreed: we cannot become more productive if we receive advice that we don’t understand 😳]
Social scientists’ necessary albeit inconvenient role here: spreading the bad news 👇 Image
“A big shock will be necessary” @DAcemogluMIT - and, IMHO, it’ll need to go beyond “Rethinking AI”: it’s about the computational ecosystem more generally (ok: me obsessing with cloud computing since last week’s presentation)
Worth mentioning is also the [total] absence of the public agenda setting role in digital technologies so far (not just innovation, but what type and direction of digital innovation do we want?)
Worrying: centralisation of data, and LLMs could amplify that @DAcemogluMIT - big elephant in the room (would’ve been good question for the incensed Google on the first panel)
[Is there a German word for unresolved problems of the digital past becoming worse in a new tech cycle?]
💯agree with an economist 😊: we need an holistic discussion on how science and technology are evolving if left on their own devices

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Simonetta Vezzoso @wavesblog@eupolicy.social

Simonetta Vezzoso @wavesblog@eupolicy.social Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @wavesblog

Mar 2
"The move to establish minimum standards builds on efforts in recent decades to write minimum security standards, especially in the energy industry, and Thursday’s document makes clear that similar measures are coming for other critical infrastructure sectors"
Biden-⁠Harris Administration Announces National Cybersecurity Strategy whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/…
"Shape Market Forces to Drive Security and Resilience" – We will place responsibility on those within our digital ecosystem that are best positioned to reduce risk and shift the consequences of poor cybersecurity away from the most vulnerable..."
Read 5 tweets
Mar 2
Historic times that we are living right now @vestager
A *very* long chapter on subsidies, understandably - entrepreneurs, not taxpayers, creating jobs...#BruxConf2023
Read 97 tweets
Mar 23, 2022
We are also preparing for the @MaCCIcomp panel with confidence 😊
Looking at the 400+ pages, what I liked most so far is the amended Recital 20 Image
Good also the explicit involvement of data protection authorities, civil society and experts as of Recital 61 re profiling Image
Read 19 tweets
Nov 24, 2021
Reading Schwab's compromise amendments (Amazon/Apple later, @SebastianLouven ) - an hidden pearl is that "The Commission may also ask one or more competent national authorities to support its market investigation" - also a DPA, of course 🙂
Missing comma between health tracking and financial services (intriguing Recital 64)
And how not to love the possibility of interim measures "where a risk of serious and immediate damage for business users or end-users of gatekeepers could result from new practices that may undermine contestability of core platform services"?
Read 28 tweets
Nov 23, 2021
Not self-executing any more - period. Consequences?
Social media: the Commission needs to come with interoperability standards.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(