1) The Russian government released this photo of the alleged Belgorod insurgents vehicles after a battle. I used to be a tow truck operator. This is staged. These vehicles didn’t crash into that trench. I’ll explain why⬇️
2) No gravel stuck in the tire tread. In fact, no dirt on the tires at all. This was loaded into that trench off a flatbed and carefully choreographed in place. Not even a low-budget war movie production would be this sloppy with realism. Let’s go to the next⬇️
3) So this humvee slammed into the trench wall head on but no soil was pushed ahead of it. Which you would have even if it hit at 10MPH. It’s a heavy vehicle. It’s going to displace soil on impact. This vehicle was placed there off a flatbed. Next⬇️
4) How did the front tire get over the trench but the rear wheels didn’t? Especially since the other vehicle nose-dived into it. Not only that, but it didn’t leave any tire tracks. In fact, the tire never touched the ground at all. Remarkable, since it just crossed a trench. ⬇️
5) But this one takes the cake. See that displaced soil? That’s from movement of the tire from your right to your left in the photo. The direction of the arrow I drew. That’s from shoving it sideways into the trench from the front of the vehicle semi-diagonally. ⬇️
6) Here’s how they did it: They used a flatbed truck and a crane. Lowered the vehicles into position, and pushed them by hand into a more dramatic pose. They probably captured these in Ukraine months ago or got them from Iran who captured them from ISIS who captured them in Iraq.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1) There’s some things bothering me about this and I need to get it off my chest. To begin with, I have a problem with one vet claiming to speak for all of us in terms of what we want. Some vets voted for Trump. They don’t speak for what I want. But the bigger issue to me is⬇️
2) Being a veteran doesn’t afford us special citizenship. We’re not entitled to decide what the 1st Amendment is because we’re vets. We do ourselves no good if we start policing the public on how they’re allowed to greet us. We’re not knights in the Medieval Period.⬇️
3) More to the point, we served the American people. They’re not our adversaries and shame on us if we see them that way. While we served, civilian leadership was basically our boss. Again, we don’t have more civil rights than those who didn’t serve. We’re equals here.⬇️
1) I’m not replying to this individual because his mind is made up and he’ll just get angry. But there are some points that need to be made. I’m not an “official” NAFO. I’m a free agent here, so to speak. But here’s my observations about what NAFO is and does extremely well.⬇️
2) Nick doesn’t understand NAFO isn’t an aid organization. While it does a lot in that, where NAFO really shines is countering Russian disinformation and agitprop. Not even the CIA could’ve done a better job in ten years and with a $10 billion dollars. How do they do this?⬇️
3) By gaining followers. This has to be accomplished by “boosting” and “see a fella follow a fella”. Why is this important? Because it overruns what was a Russian disinformation and agitprop superiority on Twitter before the war. And Ukraine knew that and said so.⬇️
1) Let’s talk about the “F-16 Paradox”. Remember how “analysts/experts” told us giving F-16s to Ukraine would be an “escalation” akin to giving them B-2 stealth bombers? Now they tell us we pretty much gave them WW1 Sopwith Camel biplanes. Contradicting themselves.⬇️
2) Remember since the beginning of the war how the “experts” told us it would “take too long” to train Ukrainian pilots on the F-16? How it was “too complicated” for them? Turns out it only takes 4 months. Another contradiction from “experts” piloting a shitwagon.⬇️
3) Remember how the “analysts/expert” told us logistics for the F-16s would simply be an impossible hurdle to overcome? Turns out that was bullshit, too. From that CNN article itself, they now openly contradict what they’ve been saying for over a year now. ⬇️
1) This will be unpleasant for some to read. But I saw this photo of the ammunition the Texas shooter used and it caught my eye. The shooter selected “varmint rounds” which are known for rapid expansion. Which would be the reason the wounds were so ghastly and fatal. More⬇️
2) Here’s a closeup. Item 1 is Sierra Prairie Enemy ammunition. Item 2 is Hornady Varmint Express ammunition. Now I looked up the manufacturer websites to see how they describe this ammunition. They’re rather proud of the ability of this stuff. More⬇️
3) I don’t know if they’ll go after me for posting it, so I won’t post those. But I have the screenshots to prove what I will say.
Prairie Enemy: “…devastating terminal performance…designed for explosive expansion in varmints…will stop them in their tracks.” More⬇️