Maricopa County APPLIED an Illegal Definition Of "Registration Record" To Their Signature Verification Process...and they knew it 💯.
EXHIBIT #1 to SPACE (later today): Recorder Richer's official page as of MAY 22, 2022
👇🚨
EXHIBIT 2:
A Voter's registration record contains a registration form or forms if they reregistered, driver's license & other documents related to registration. But the signature "on" the registration record is the sig used to register.
Now compare 16-550 w 16-153: "in" vs "on"👇
EXHIBIT 3: Fontes ALSO published at the official Maricopa Recorder site that an Early Ballot affidavit signature must be compared to THE SIGNATURE on what? Anybody? The "original registration form"👇
EXHIBIT 4:
MARICOPA ELECTION PLAN - introduced as a Defense Exhibit at trial
EXHIBIT 5:
Rey Valenzuela Testimony at Trial #1
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
You've heard from the Court, the attorneys, the pundits, and now you're going to hear complete LEGAL CLARITY about the 2d trial in Lake v Hobbs just completed May 17-19. You are going to UNDERSTAND the law, precedents, mistakes and best chances for appeal. twitter.com/i/spaces/1mrxm…
EXHIBIT #1
Reyes v. Cuming
191 Ariz. 91 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1997)
1/2 @JenWEsq You said Maricopa should "NOT" have used "real-time Provisional Ballot" process in past, but that you saw no evidence they used it in '22 or in Abe & Kari's races. Here's proof MC still uses RTPB since 16-579 was updated...AT THEIR SITE NOW👇 elections.maricopa.gov/voting/just-th…
2/2 @JenWEsq We need your integrity and expertise to EXPOSE this illegality in Maricopa Elections. See👇at MC site. On same page it says "tabulators cannot read provisional ballots" but later says "the voter is issued a real time provisional ballot" - which IS tabulated on site.
PLEASE DOCUMENT REAL-TIME PROVISIONAL BALLOT USE IS CURRENT AS OF TODAY May 19, 2023 at Maricopa County "Just The Facts" page...
1/3 TRIAL ANALYSIS
That Maricopa etal didn't rest after @KariLake rested May have been a strategic error bc Liddy's exam of Valenzuela opens the door on 2 key points:
1. He testified 25 heads have Level 2 review login credentials. The strongest chance Kari has is by proving...
2/3...that L2 couldn't possibly do legit review of 267k ballots in time allowed. Her witnesses testified there were only 3 L2 heads. High MC officials like Rey may have L2 power but he only did 1600, while the main 3 were doing bulk. Kari is entitled now to log discovery as to...
3/3...EXACTLY how many ballots were sig reviewed in '22 by top level login IDs. It's probably ZERO for most. RICHER & JARRETT have L2 authority but they weren't doing much grunt work.
2. See my previous tweets👇about putting Rey on clock and crossing him on this 1ballot/sec BS.
So Valenzuela just said he can do accurate signature review in less than a second. Ok, request a real demonstration in Court ON THE CLOCK with a random sample of ballots. Make him prove it @KariLake attorneys 💯🚨
On cross-exam ask Valenzuela if there are log files showing him personally conducting signature review in a second or less. You can't just let him say drop that PREJUDICIAL CRAP without PROOF. They have log records. Did he approve sigs THAT fast this election? DEMAND LOG FILES🚨
THEY MUST CHALLENGE THAT 1sec/ballot Valenzuela super ballot review hype. IT'S MEGA PREJUDICIAL. @KariLake deserves DISCOVERY.
1/2 Valenzuela: "He was removed from the process of signature verification...it was not because of that video or not because he was reviewing as he was required to do."
1. Rey doesn't deny video shows reckless verification; 2. Rey states he wasn't removed for doing the job right