Thread by @JWalters314

I see some folks are duped by the Durham report.

Yes, Durham Report explores the role of public popularity in the decision to seek criminal charges, and the potential role of popularity in obtaining a conviction.

The people from the GOP Deep State cabal that installed Trump

and that sought to partner with Russia to permit US corporations to extract resources from the Arctic understand how popular opinion can influence DOJ and how a media, controlled by the cabal, can influence popular opinion.

Why do you think Trump's always playing the victim and

his handler's trying to influence public opinion to shape DOJ actions?

Or the actions of state or local prosecutors?

Carter Page was a CIA asset = Page was a GOP Deep State cabal asset = the cabal used CIA (compartmentalization) to try to block FBI investigation into Page.

Durham Report = GOP Deep State cabal's attempt to control the narrative, to reframe thinking and to write history to attempt to push a fiction as the "truth."

Garland perhaps is on the payroll of the GOP Deep State cabal, meaning his firm gets work

https://twitter.com/sprzyslp/status/1661607029943963648

pushed to it by the GOP Cabal of wealth guys?

This cabal dislikes when it does not have complete control of FBI (or CIA).

Having like 80% control is not enough for the cabal of the wealthy fascists.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1661100628725096449

The grievance framing of the strip mall lawyer's for Trump, in the letter sent to A.G. Garland is how the cabal operates as they seek to influence DOJ by influencing public opinion via propaganda.

Under the special counsel regs, A.G. Garland does have the ultimate say as to what any special counsel wants to do.

No surprise Trump's handlers have the strip-mall lawyer's send the AG a letter.

Don't laugh about strip-mall lawyers.

Trump's 2nd impeachment lawyer was a dog bite lawyer. No, really, the K9 bite type.

Over decades, #SCOTUS has gutted laws aimed at fighting corruption.

#SCOTUS tears down any laws that limit the ability of the powerful to enrich public officials in a position to advance their interests, meaning, the Supreme Court acts on behalf of a wealthy cabal.

Wealthy individuals and corporations (mostly owned by a top X%) may buy political access and influence with little fear of legal consequences, either for them or for the beneficiaries of their largess.

America is a thinly veiled crime state.

We have owners and oligarchs.

In Skilling v. United States, #SCOTUS ruled honest services fraud is limited to cases of bribes and kickbacks - direct quid pro quo deals.

IOW, they made it impossible to bring a case.

Corrupt Clarence Thomas, who GOP Deep State kingpin HW Bush appointed, wanted to go even

further and declare the statute that prohibits honest services fraud unconstitutional.

Succession is a parallel of the GOP Deep State cabal's corruption and control of Fox News that was set up using funding HW Bush's right-hand man Theodore Shackley provided to Murdoch.

The quid-pro-quo's between HW Bush and Murdoch allowed the GOP Deep State cabal to make Fox a GOP Propaganda Machine.

Murdoch became an investor with Michael Milken and Leon Black at Drexel Burnham Lambert = GOP Deep State.

https://twitter.com/lawrencehurley/status/1658827650872295434

https://twitter.com/JWalters314/status/1656083350774337538

Murdoch later launched Fox News in partnership with former Nixon aide Roger Ailes.

HW Bush and Nixon were bound by the Nov 22, 1963 Big Lie.

https://twitter.com/JWalters314/status/1656178997909127173

The reason James Comer, a rep for the GOP Deep State cabal, is ready to defund the FBI is that corrupt Wray is not willing to go far enough for the cabal.

The cabal wants Wray to advance the narrative about a cooked up criminal scheme involving then-VP Joe Biden and a

foreign national.

Wray knows he'd be breaking laws if he went over the edge for the GOP Deep State cabal that he, in fact, serves, and Wray can't find a way to serve his masters in this case, yet, as it's too risky for him.

Pivot:

There is such a defense among some folks charged that goes like this: “we thought that we were doing it for the CIA."

I wonder, does the GOP Deep State cabal of wealthy men, fewer than about 60 in 1960, but maybe a few hundred by 2023, run operations, recruiting useful

idiots, and telling them they are working for CIA?

By useful idiot, I mean, a figure from organized crime.

For a club of billionaires, what is to stop you from impersonating your associates as CIA case officers?

Couldn't you partner with organized crime, and claim to assets that you are CIA?

At the same time, if you're guy is not running CIA at the time, you can still have loyal cabal assets inside the CIA across administrations who can make your story look legit to your partners from

organized crime.

When Dulles was forced out, is that how the rich guys he represented through Sullivan and Cromwell maintained their ability to use CIA to partner with organized crime, across D and R Presidents?