Gandhi was disqualified pursuant to a Gujarat court convicting him in a criminal defamation case for his "all thieves have Modi surname remark."
Rahul Gandhi's plea has been opposed by BJP leader Subramanian Swamy who said that there is no reason why the passport should be issued for ten years.
He has asked the Court to give NOC only for a year and review the same periodically.
Gandhi's plea will be heard by ACMM Vaibhav Mehta.
Matter taken up.
Swamy: He has asked for passport valid for ten years, which is maximum. But this is a special case.
Swamy: There is no such thing as a fundamental right to passport. He has no valid reason for the passport for ten years. Permission should be granted after analysing the other correlated matters.
Swamy: I Was in Britain recently and there, an official told me that Gandhi has declared himself as a British citizen.. Under Indian law his Indian citizenship should be directly cancelled.
Court: So he is not saying that the passport should not be granted but it should be for a year.
Advocate Tarannum Cheema for Gandhi.
Cheema: Ten years is given as a matter of routine. In so far as citizenship part is concerned, firstly the document he has annexed will not amount to criminal proceedings. We have not heard anything from the Ministry since 2019.
Cheema: People who have been involved in graver offences have been granted passports for ten years. It includes 2G and other cases...
There is no condition in the bail orders about me informing courts before traveling: Cheema.
Court: You are ready to cooperate in the investigation?
Cheema: Absolutely. Cross examination is going on.
Court: Mr Swamy, do you have anything to say on their argument that in graver offences passports have been given for ten years.
Swamy: If something wrong has happened in the past, it is not a precedent.
Court: We will give the order by 1pm.
Court rises.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
[Exchange of ₹2000 notes] RBI tells Delhi HC that this is a currency management excercise. The central bank reiterates that this is not demonetisation. #DelhiHighCourt#RBI#2000Note
Senior Advocate Parag Tripathi made the submission as the Court was dealing with a PIL challenging the RBI notification.
The petitioner has said that RBI does not have the power to discontinue banknotes and such an order has to come from the Central government.
The Court has adjourned the case to Monday and asked the counsel to submit short notes of their submission.
A Division Bench of Justices Manmohan and Dinesh Kumar Sharma has dismissed the petitions filed by Gandhis, AAP and five non-profits associated with the Gandhi family.
There is no fundamental or vested legal right to be assessed by the faceless assessment, the Court said.
It added that the assessment has been transferred in accordance with law and for better coordination.
#SupremeCourtofIndia to hear plea challenging the Telangana High Court order that had granted conditional bail to T Gangi Reddy in the YS Vivekananda Reddy murder case
Suneetha Nareddy, daughter of YS Vivekananda Reddy has moved a petition before the Supreme Court challenging the high court order granting conditional bail to accused T Gangi Reddy #SupremeCourtofIndia
CBI has informed the #SupremeCourtofIndia that Telangana HC order had pre-judged, pre-empted and encroached upon power/discretion of the Supreme Court under Article 142 of the Constitution of India
#SupremeCourt to hear All India Trinamool Congress national general secretary Abhishek Banerjee's plea against an order of Calcutta HC that imposed costs of ₹25 lakh on him and allowed ED and CBI probe against him in the school jobs for cash scam @AITCofficial@abhishekaitc
Justice Maheshwari: I have gone through the records. ACJ has changed the bench. they afforded an opportunity to hear the application and order was passed. HC says they cannot interfere in probe and how is this wrong..
Justice Narasimha: apart from costs prima facie there is no problem with the order
Singhvi: 1. it is common ground that in SC orders the court directed a de novo hearing uninfluenced with what happened in HC before. 2. the man is giving a speech and he has nothing to do with the… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Vacation bench of #SupremeCourtofIndia to hear petition seeking directions to the Lok Sabha Secretariat to have the new parliament building inaugurated by the President of India, Droupadi Murmu @rashtrapatibhvn#ParliamentBuilding
Justice PS Narasimha: be grateful we are not imposing costs
Adv Jayasukin: Article 79 says president is the head of parliament. It is a policy matter I agree.. but this is about the president
Justice Narasimha: What is your locus? we know why you file such petitions. we are not… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Justice JK Maheshwari: how is Article 79 related to the inauguration?
Jayasukin: at the commencement of parliament session. president addresses the house.. how can the president be left out
SC: How is addressing the parliament and inauguration is related.. ? you are a lawyer… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
#SupremeCourtofIndia vacation bench to hear bail petition of jailed AAP leader Satyendar Jain in a money laundering case by the Enforcement Directorate (ED)
Jain was admitted to an ICU at Lok Nayak Jai Prakash Narayan (LNJP) Hospital, on Thursday @dir_ed@SatyendarJain
Sr Adv Dr AM Singhvi: there are overwhelming grounds for a medical bail.. main bail can be considered later on...
Justice Maheshwari: only medical ground..
ASG SV Raju: we doubt lok nayak hospital and we feel medical records could be fudged.. let him be examined by AIIMS panel… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
ASG: If the AIIMS report in his favour then I will concede.. he was a health minister.. these Delhi govt hospitals were under him..