There have been multiple questions /doubts /clarifications after the Govt announced the installation of #SengolAtNewParliament . Wanted to pick of few of the points & try to reason out.
First, is it really true that British asked for a Symbol ? Possibly yes as they give lot of
importance to traditions & in all probability the question might have been asked to Nehru formally or informally. Why did Nehru speak to Rajaji? That is because Rajaji was by far the best of his close aides who has knowledge on the traditions &heritage of the country at that time
Note that this incident is officially recorded in the Thiruvavaduthurai records & no reason to suspect it
Rajaji was a Vaishnavite & Kanchi Mutt was famous at that time. Why Thiruvavaduthurai then? Thiruvavaduthurai Adheenam has a treasure trove collection of historical records
with many manuscripts from Sangam Days. If one reads ‘En Sarithiram’ of U Ve Saminatha Iyer, this can be inferred as it was like a mini university. So there is no surprise that the Adheenam was reached to provide a solution to the issue as Rajaji might have needed some historical
backing than going to Nehru with only a spiritual angle.
Why the Adheenam didn’t go? Sri Ambalavana Desikar who incidentally has the same name of the current Adheenam (Coincident?) was sick & that’s why he has asked his Thambiran to go for this occasion
This incidents was narrated by the current Adheenam & there is no room for any doubt on that front.
Then the laughable suggestion that the Sengol was just a gift. Of the 1000s of Mutt’s across India, the Adheenam sending a group of Othuvars, a prominent Nageswara Vidwan
(TN Rajaratnam Pillai) and others for just giving a gift ? Of all the ‘gifts’ received, this incident figures predominantly in ‘Time’ Magazine and in the book ‘Freedom at Midnight’ ? One must be kidding if they think this is just a gift. It definitely has a significance & hence
the prominent reference of Sceptre & handing over ceremony with the a Photo
Perhaps the bizarre thing is few saying Sengol is a Symbol of monarchy. Innumerable literature & inscriptional evidence in Tamil history says Sengol is a Symbol of Dharmic rule,good Governance & Justice
Kings were holding it in those times while conducting the affairs of the country as they were the rulers. During current times of democracy,it needs to be in the place where the governance happens. So saying Sengol is symbol of monarchy shows nothing but ignorance of our heritage
Now the Adheenam himself has come forward to expose the lies of naysayers
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A thread on some of the important Durga Vigrahas from the archives, on the auspicious occasion of #DurgaAshtami
One of the oldest Durga from Pallava era, from Singavaram. Here Goddess is seem with the Prayoga Chakra.
Durga from Varaha Mandapa, Mamallapuram. A devotee performing Navakandam on the right side of the Goddess. This is one of the common features found in many of the medieval Durga panels.
You can also notice two Vahanas of Durga, Lion & Deer on both sides.
As usual, the 'historian' is back with an article in Print with the usual incorrect facts, half truths and the known Chola hate. Here are some of the 'gems' from the article.
"In the hill’s vast history, it’s relatively recent—around the 9th-10th centuries CE—that it became sacred to Vishnu as Venkateswara"
The sanctity of the holy Hill as an abode of Vishnu is there since the Sangam period of Tamil Nadu. Texts such as Tolkappiyam, Silappadiharam have praised the deity of Mahavishnu in Tirumala Hills since the beginning of common era. Azhwars right from 6th Century have sung in praise of Tirupati Perumal in many verses. So it is ameturish to say that the shrine became 'sacred around 9-10th century.
"From the 11th century, the Cholas unleashed conquests across southern India and lavished Tamil temples with captured war loot"
Amazing to say the least. What is the proof that Cholas lavished temples with 'war loot'. Even before their great wars, Cholas along with the other Kings in the region have patronized many times. The entire temple building activity of Cholas were ushered when they were a small kingdom. Historians need to get their facts right.
"By the early 11th century, temple inscriptions first mentioned its processional bronzes and a ritual calendar of just seven days"
Totally incorrect 'fact'. The first of the inscriptions in the temple are from Pallava era. The first major inscription is from the Pallava queen Samavai, who belonged to the 9-10th century and donated the bronzes and established the festivals.
The first major inscription of Cholas is from Rajaraja Chola's era, which was also from 10th Century.
அடிப்படை எதுவும் தெரியாமல் எழுதுவது எப்படின்னு இவங்க கிட்டத்தான் “கற்றுக்கொள்ளவேண்டும்”. முருகன் எப்போதுமே வேதக்கடவுள் தான். சங்க இலக்கியமான திருமுருகாற்றுப்படை சொல்வதென்ன ?
“மந்திர விதியின் மரபுளி வழாஅ
அந்தணர் வேள்வி ஓர்க்கும்மே; ஒரு முகம்”
வேத மந்திரங்களின் மாறாமல் அந்தணர்கள் தரும் வேள்வியை முருகனின் ஒரு முகம் ஏற்குமாம்.
அது மட்டுமா
“ஆறு எழுத்து அடக்கிய அரு மறைக் கேள்வி
நா இயல் மருங்கில் நவிலப் பாடி”
வேத மந்திரங்களை ஓதியே முருகனை வழிபடுகிறார்களாம். இன்னொரு சங்க நூலான பரிபாடல் சொல்வது
“அறு முகத்து ஆறு இரு தோளால் வென்றி
நறு மலர் வள்ளிப் பூ நயந்தோயே!
இரு பிறப்பு, இரு பெயர், ஈர நெஞ்சத்து,
ஒரு பெயர், அந்தணர் அறன் அமர்ந்தோயே”
வள்ளியை மணம் புரிந்த முருகன் அந்தணரின் அறத்தில் அமர்ந்திருக்கிறானாம்.
அடுத்து ஆறுபடை வீடுகளைப் பற்றி இஷ்டத்துக்கு அடித்து விடுகிறார் கட்டுரையாசிரியர். முதன்முதலில் ஆறு படை வீடுகளைப் பற்றிச் சொல்வதே சங்க இலக்கியமான திருமுருகாற்றுப்படைதான். திருப்பரங்குன்றம், திருச்செந்தூர், திருஆவினன்குடியான பழனி, திருஏராகமான சுவாமிமலை, குன்றுதோறாடல், பழமுதிர்ச்சோலை என்று வரிசைப்படுத்துபவர் சங்கப்புலவரான நக்கீரர்
முருகனின் வேல் ஏதோ தமிழ்நாட்டுக்கு மட்டும் உரியது என்று சொல்வதுதான் ஆகப்பெரிய காமெடி. இந்தியாவில் கிடைத்த ஆகப்பழமையான முருகன் உருவங்கள் வட நாட்டில் தான் கிடைத்திருக்கின்றன. அவை அனைத்திலும் வேலோடு தான் முருகன் காட்சியளிக்கிறார். எல்லாம் பொயுமு விற்கு முந்தயவை.
Saw this quote in FB, posted by one of the known handles and hence there is no room to doubt that this is a fake one. It is indeed surprising that a ‘professor’ from a reputed university, especially in Tamil Chair, has made such an incorrect statement. It even raises doubts in terms of how much Sangam literature he knows.
Let us look at how Sangam texts describes Aryans.
“ஆரியர் பொன் படு நெடு வரை புரையும்” says Agananooru 398. This means Ariyars are those who lived near Himalayas whose icy glaciers shine like Gold. This fits into the definition of inhabitants of Aryavarta, who were called as Ariyars by Tamil poets. Another Sangam text Pathitrupathu says ‘ஆரியர் துவன்றிய பேரிசை இமயம்’, that Aryas lived near the Himalaya.
The Sangam text “Kurinji Pattu” was sung to inform the Arya King Brahadatta about the process of marriage in Tamilagam. There are many such ‘Kings’ from Arya Varta mentioned by Tamil literature
Many Tamil sangam texts speak about the war between Kings from Aryavarta and Tamil Kings “ஆரியர் துவன்றிய பேரிசை முள்ளூர்”, says Natrinai 170 mentioning about the war at Mullur between one Malayan and Ariyar army.