Recent study present an analysis of “the gap between the CO2 storage required to meet net zero targets and the slow maturation of regional storage resources.”
Researchers estimate that “European storage rates need to boost 30-100x by 2030 to meet #NetZero by 2050. 🇨🇳 & North America face a similar challenge. The slow global progress of #CarbonStorage undermines the latest IPCC, IEA & EU transition pathways to net zero by 2050.”
2/12
Here, scientists of this study investigate “if sufficient #storage can be developed in time. China 🇨🇳 (30%), (15%) and Europe 🇪🇺(10%) dominate global #emissions.”
In this study, “Europe was chosen as a data-rich exemplar.”
4/12
“Assuming #NetZero in 2050, researchers back-calculate the #storage required under 3️⃣ scenarios of low, medium, and high #CCS demand.”
5/12
“Even the low demand scenario requires 0.2 Gt of #storage by 2030, increasing to 1.3 Gt by 2050. The moderate & high demand scenarios require 5-8 Gt by 2050. The current #CarbonStorage rate in #Europe is 0.001 Gt/yr.”
6/12
So, “there is a huge gap btw policy demand & #storage supply. Adaptation of existing #hydrocarbon tech has the potential to close this gap, with CCS for the entire EU requiring less than half the historic rate of HC exploration & development in UK North Sea from 1980-2010.”
7/12
“Counter to expectation, #storage cannot be delivered by exponential growth but requires an early & sustained investment of 30-50 boreholes per year starting before 2030 to build sufficient capacity,” researchers affirmed.
8/12
“A 5-year lead-time to identify & mature prospects needs policy intervention before 2025. Continued policy deferral will lock Europe into a low CCS pathway that restricts the contribution of #NETs at a potential cost of €100 billion for every gigatonne delayed beyond 2050.”
9/12
According to this research, “North America & China require similar policy intervention to close the gap on #CarbonStorage and #NetZero.”
10/12
To get more information on the research entitled: "Mind the gap: will slow progress on carbon dioxide storage undermine net zero by 2050?" (Preprint) visit ⬇️
📖📝➡️eartharxiv.org/repository/vie…
🚨Monthly Solar Geoengineering Updates (Dec Edition)
From NCAR’s possible shutdown & the Guardian’s sun-dimming debate to an African-led #SRM hub, the EU’s first governance conference & new studies, SRM dominated headlines and labs alike.
Top 10 SRM Highlights (Dec 2025)🧵1/8
1️⃣ Trump administration plans to dismantle NCAR, a leading hub for climate & SRM research
2️⃣ Guardian editorial sparks debate, warning of “sun-dimming” under political control. In response, letters argue research shutdown stifles science & misrepresents African perspectives.
2/
3️⃣ DSG launches SRM Governance Horizons, a project to assess institutional readiness and inclusive governance for solar radiation modification debates.
4️⃣ Sandro Vattioni wins China’s 2025 Pineapple Science Award for research on diamond dust as a potential SRM material.
🚨What if old clothes could power cities & remove CO₂?
New study shows that modular bioenergy with carbon capture (#BECCS) using discarded textiles can cut emissions, beat landfilling on env impacts & deliver durable #CDR at costs competitive with today’s CDR markets.
🧵1/10
2/ ~92 Mt of textile waste are generated globally each year. Roughly half is biogenic (e.g., cotton), meaning it already represents stored atmospheric CO₂ captured by plants during growth.
Yet ~66% of US textiles are landfilled, releasing GHGs & pollutants over time.
3/ In this study, researches model a 100 t/day modular waste-to-energy plant using:
• 100% cotton textiles
• 50/50 cotton–PET blends
Each case is assessed with and without CCS and compared to landfilling using full LCA + techno-economic analysis.
🚨Can land-based and ocean-based #CarbonRemoval work together, without undermining each other?
A new Earth system modeling study shows that combining BECCS & OAE delivers near-additive CO₂ removal, cutting ~23 ppm by 2100, while exposing critical Earth-system feedbacks.
🧵1/11
2/ As emissions cuts lag, most 1.5–2°C pathways now rely on carbon dioxide removal.
But the real question isn’t which CDR method is best, it’s what happens when multiple CDR approaches are deployed together inside the real climate system.
3/ To answer this, researchers used the Norwegian Earth System Model, simulating the period from 2030 to 2100 under an overshoot scenario where CO₂ first rises, then falls into net-negative territory.
This allowed them to track long-term land, ocean, and atm responses.
🚨'Rock candy' technique offers simpler, less costly way to capture C directly from air
U of Toronto engineers have developed a cheap, passive, string-based #DAC system that crystallizes CO₂ like “rock candy,” potentially cutting capital costs by up to 40%.
How it works🧵1/11
Direct air capture has existed for decades, but it’s expensive. Giant fans, complex chemical plants, and energy-intensive regeneration steps drive up costs. That’s the main criticism of today’s DAC industry.
U of Toronto researchers tackled the problem with a simple question:
What if we could let nature do most of the work?
Their answer: evaporative carbonate crystallization, a passive, wind-powered approach.
🚨🗞️Monthly Solar Geoengineering Updates (November Edition)
From the U.S. stratospheric-cooling patent to Global South funding, cautious UK–EU stances, tipping-point modeling & a surge in chemtrail chatter, #SRM captured global attention.
Top 10 SRM Highlights (Nov 2025)🧵1/6:
➡️@MakeSunsets secures its first US patent for stratospheric cooling tech
➡️Climate scientists remain skeptical of SRM, favor research over deployment, per @SZ (Garman newspaper) survey
➡️Royal Society sees SRM’s potential but stresses it can't solve climate change alone
🧵2/
➡️London Protocol reiterates precaution on marine geoengineering deployment
➡️UK reiterates it is “not in favor” of SRM deployment but open to debating regulation
➡️Studies warn SAI may cut protein in staple crops & destabilize yields for coffee, cacao & wine
🚨A new modeling study finds Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (#SAI) could lower risks to many of Earth’s #TippingPoints, but not all.
High-latitude deployment best protects ice sheets & permafrost, while low-latitude deployment favors rainforests & coral reefs.
DETAILS🧵1/14
2/ Tipping elements are highly sensitive to warming.
This study analyzes how different SAI designs (equatorial, mid-latitude, high-latitude & multi-objective strategy) influence the drivers of these tipping systems under SSP2-4.5.
3/ Across most tipping elements, SAI decreases risk relative to continued warming, but magnitude & direction of response are strongly pattern-dependent.
CO₂-driven warming & SAI-driven cooling aren't climatic mirror images - SAI can over- or under-compensate regional changes