Paul Niland Profile picture
May 28 4 tweets 2 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
Now he's on the record with another blatant lie. This one commonly repeated by vatniks and other assorted apologists. He says that before their full scale invasion, Ukraine was shelling the Donbas for 8 years. It's whataboutism to deflect from war crimes accusations. And a lie.
Here are the facts.

russia invaded the Donbas in 2014. Ukraine had every right to fight to kick them out. But that never included attacks on civilians. A military force was sent to counter military force. And the Ukrainians were winning on the battlefield, map spring/summer '14. Image
To reverse the looming defeat more russian regular forces got involved in the fight, due to international concerns the parties were brought together in Minsk for mediation.

The resulting agreement required an international observation mission on the ground. The @OSCE namely.
Now to the conclusion of this thread. If Ukraine had spent 8 years bombing the civilian population of the Donbas, the #OSCE would have had 8 years of records of this. They don't. Because it's a russian lie.

Also, as a result of Minsk, Ukraine's artillery was kept in storage too.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Paul Niland

Paul Niland Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PaulNiland

Aug 5, 2022
First.

I haven't joined the calls for @AgnesCallamard to resign. But if she doesn't apologise unreservedly for this grossly insulting tweet she should.

Now, onto the many problems with the @amnesty report itself.

A thread.
The @amnesty report is factually wrong. The Ukrainian military and police forces make every effort to evacuate civilians from harm's way. Last week the mandatory evacuation of Donetsk was ordered by the authorities.

Citizens of Kherson were advised to evacuate weeks ago too.
The premise of the @amnesty report is wrong. You're asked to accept that the presence of Ukrainian forces in residential areas is wrong.

When those residential areas are being attacked by Russian forces, where else are Ukrainians going to fight back and repel the attack from?
Read 6 tweets
Mar 22, 2022
Let's dispel a lie at the heart of Putin's war. Protecting Russian speakers.

The notion that Russian speaking parts of Ukraine have a somehow different outlook, which translates as sympathies to things Russian in general, is false. Flat out wrong. But widely believed.

Thread.
Just prior to the war I did an interview in which the opening question, genuine, was "what if Putin just takes the Russian speaking parts, in the east?"

The video above is from a Russian speaking city. There's no "just" there, is there?

Who is Putin "protecting" there?
Being a Russian speaker in Ukraine may influence the church you go to, how you consume news or vote. We know the destabilising tricks played on the country through those mediums. Nevertheless, Russian speakers never faced restrictions in those areas.

So what needing protecting?
Read 12 tweets
Mar 20, 2022
Classic example of a propaganda dupe provided by @DominiqueTaegon here.

"Banning the Russian language, opposition news channels, and deposing leaders via coup, is not democratic at all."

None of this is true. There are 3 claims, thread:
1) The Russian language is not banned in Ukraine. The sole official state language is Ukrainian. These are two different things. Language preference is a personal matter and in 20 years of living in Ukraine I've never seen anyone criticised for their language choice.
2) No TV/radio channels were banned because of political views. Channels nominally belonging to Victor Medvedchuk were closed on national security grounds, with good reason. Putin is godfather to his daughter.

🇷🇺 Funded these propaganda platforms. How?

occrp.org/en/investigati…
Read 6 tweets
Mar 6, 2022
This quote is specifically about "continuing" a nuclear arms programme.

Here's the thing.

Putin's threat now (again!) is based on something he invented. There's zero truth behind it. Absolutely none at all.

More insanity. More excuses for war.

Thread on the reality.

1/?
Ukraine is not developing nuclear weapons. Putin also claimed this invented arms programme was being done with (cue baddie music) The West.

Well. Ukraine HAD nuclear weapons at the time of independence, 30 years ago. We'll spin back to The Budapest Memorandum later.

2/?
When countries try to acquire nuclear capabilities, that's kind of a big issue, globally. Waving at Iran and North Korea.

The global community tries to stop the growth of nuclear-armed countries. Why? Because they're the worst invention in human history.

3/?
Read 12 tweets
Feb 18, 2021
There's so much wrong with this, a thread is needed to unpack it.

First, there is an answer to this question. It lies in the proper implentation of the #Minskk deal that #Russia agreed to but has consistently ignored.

Point one: ceasefire. Russia has never done this.

Cont...
Minsk requires that Russia ceases fire. Then (Point two) retires heavy equipment (their tools of war) to a safe distance and that (Point three) the OSCE SMM be allowed to verify this.

Instead, Russian occupation forces constantly harass OSCE monitors, & shoot down their drones.
Planning for elections in the areas under temporary Russian occupation (Point four) follows Points one, two & three. Russia has not complied, to this day, with those three points.

Elections can & will only happen after hostilities cease. Not under Russia's occupation or terms.
Read 11 tweets
Nov 26, 2018
Want to know the narratives playing out on Russian media related to events in the #KerchStrait - this analysis by the Hybrid Warfare Analytical Group at the @uacrisis centre.

THREAD:

"We've been closely monitoring the Kremlin media over the last 24 hours."

1/11
2/11 "Main messages of the Russian propaganda regarding the crisis in the Kerch Strait, close to annexed Crimea, can be divided into two main groups: those directly concerning the seizure of three Ukrainian vessels and those on the wider political situation."
3/11 "Key points for Group 1 are as follows:

Allegedly, Ukraine hasn't warned Russia about the ships’ movement beforehand & the ships seized performed dangerous maneuvers in the Russian waters;
It is claimed that the Ukrainian boats received a warning that they chose to ignore"
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(