As of today, @medpagetoday and @KristinaMFiore are the only entities continuing the defamatory statements reporting on Sheldrick's original claim which he has now fully retracted.
Meanwhile Kristina Fiore is very aware that her claims are false as I reminded her again two days ago, following which she blocked me - confirming that she has read my tweet.
Here is the full text of Kyle Sheldrick's Schedule A statement:
On 22 March 2022, I posted a blog post called 'This scattrd corn'. This post was a copy of a complaint I filed with the journal CHEST identifying features of a study led by Paul Marik titled 'Hydrocortisone, Vitaminβ¦ twitter.com/i/web/status/1β¦
As I have said a number of times, the people who are promoting the pharma and government narrative think they are protected.
They aren't.
Whoever Kyle was acting for threw him under the bus when I wrote this thread a year ago.
Bear in mind also that it was @MicrobiomDigest who persecuted Didier Raoult over his 2020 #Hydroxychloroquine paper which was a rapid review for obvious reasons.
Yet she completely ignored the @NEJM's impossibly rapid acceptance of the Pfizer vaccine paper
π§΅
Remember that this study was published on the 10th December 2020 - the same day as the FDA VRBPAC submission, so it was IMPOSSIBLE to have been adequately peer reviewed.
It was a 44,000 patient study. Proper peer review should take weeks.
Worse still, the data cut off (the last patient data collection) for the study was 14th November.
The COI declarations - which are usually sent in when the paper is *accepted* (rather than submitted for peer review) were dated 1st December.
If this was my son I wouldn't be posting pictures on twitter pretending everything was OK. I would be at the football club asking who had authorised the prescription of a therapy that was known to cause myocarditis and should never have been given.
I'm going to show you that whoever (from NSW health) told the NCAT tribunal (under oath) that they do not retain the data for the COVID vaccination reports... committed perjury.
Here is a different FOI report from NSW health asking a parallel question regarding manipulated data which involved @NCIRS - desperate to cover their tracks over a failed vaccination campaign.
GIPA 23/51
This page states clearly that the databases (the source data) exist
Here's the next part leading to another lie.
For an epidemiologist to review the "outputs" they must exist in a tangible format, as data frames are only held on the client computer. You can't send them to anyone.
The files for review existed, saying they didn't is a lie.
Amazing thread showing that .@NSWHealth under the leadership of @NSWCHO - who lied, and @BradHazzard - whose fascistic "temporary" laws led to thousands of deaths - hid and then deleted data showing that the vaccines were INCREASING ICU rates.
NSW health are so powerful that this tweet - exposing the $65m government grants to Kristine Macartney (the govt's expert witness in the Kassam trial challenging the vaccine mandates) was deleted as a direct response to a threat from the govt lawyers. archive.is/Kq4xA