Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture
May 29 β€’ 8 tweets β€’ 5 min read Twitter logo Read on Twitter
BREAKING πŸ§€:
Kyle Sheldrick @K_Sheldrick posts a formal statement accepting that he was wrong about his vexatious fraud claim against @drpaulmarik1.

A "schedule A" statement is the agreed statement that the person who committed defamation must place.
kylesheldrick.blogspot.com/2023/05/update… On 22 March 2022, I posted ...
The above statement is reformatted for readability from the original statement archived here.

archive.is/T1kEj
As of today, @medpagetoday and @KristinaMFiore are the only entities continuing the defamatory statements reporting on Sheldrick's original claim which he has now fully retracted.

I hope they have good lawyers
Those tweets have been archived.

Meanwhile Kristina Fiore is very aware that her claims are false as I reminded her again two days ago, following which she blocked me - confirming that she has read my tweet. Image
Here is the full text of Kyle Sheldrick's Schedule A statement:

On 22 March 2022, I posted a blog post called 'This scattrd corn'. This post was a copy of a complaint I filed with the journal CHEST identifying features of a study led by Paul Marik titled 'Hydrocortisone, Vitamin… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… Image
As I have said a number of times, the people who are promoting the pharma and government narrative think they are protected.
They aren't.

Whoever Kyle was acting for threw him under the bus when I wrote this thread a year ago.
Dr Marik has shown what a wonderful man he is by accepting this statement by Kyle Sheldrick as the end of the matter.

He had some good people behind him and was on the side of truth.

It's one small victory in the battle to regain honesty in medical science.

@Fynnderella1
If you really want to go further into the back story of this just click on the #ChisquaredKyle hashtag or here:

twitter.com/search?q=%23Ch…

β€’ β€’ β€’

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
γ€€

Keep Current with Jikkyleaks 🐭

Jikkyleaks 🐭 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Jikkyleaks

May 29
Bear in mind also that it was @MicrobiomDigest who persecuted Didier Raoult over his 2020 #Hydroxychloroquine paper which was a rapid review for obvious reasons.

Yet she completely ignored the @NEJM's impossibly rapid acceptance of the Pfizer vaccine paper
🧡 Image
Remember that this study was published on the 10th December 2020 - the same day as the FDA VRBPAC submission, so it was IMPOSSIBLE to have been adequately peer reviewed.

It was a 44,000 patient study. Proper peer review should take weeks. Image
Worse still, the data cut off (the last patient data collection) for the study was 14th November.

The COI declarations - which are usually sent in when the paper is *accepted* (rather than submitted for peer review) were dated 1st December.

nejm.org/author-center/… Image
Read 9 tweets
May 28
He's 29 and collapsed on the pitch as an athlete having played football for more than 20 years.

He is pictured with a temporary pacemaker.

There is nothing OK about this and while parents live in denial there will continue to be more deaths.

#myocarditisisnotok
If this was my son I wouldn't be posting pictures on twitter pretending everything was OK. I would be at the football club asking who had authorised the prescription of a therapy that was known to cause myocarditis and should never have been given.

Then I'd ring @pjhlaw to get… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Some pads can be used for defibrillation & pacing. It would be unusual to leave defib-only pads on after a event.

These particular pads are used for temporary pacing without having to reattach pads.

If he's "OK" he doesn't need them. He's not "OK" ImageImage
Read 5 tweets
May 28
BOOM πŸ’₯πŸ’₯πŸ’₯πŸ’₯

I'm going to show you that whoever (from NSW health) told the NCAT tribunal (under oath) that they do not retain the data for the COVID vaccination reports... committed perjury.

This is a follow up to yesterday's bombshell


THREAD πŸ‘‡πŸ‘‡
Here is a different FOI report from NSW health asking a parallel question regarding manipulated data which involved @NCIRS - desperate to cover their tracks over a failed vaccination campaign.

GIPA 23/51

This page states clearly that the databases (the source data) exist Image
Here's the next part leading to another lie.

For an epidemiologist to review the "outputs" they must exist in a tangible format, as data frames are only held on the client computer. You can't send them to anyone.

The files for review existed, saying they didn't is a lie. Image
Read 15 tweets
May 28
The logic of this is so abject it is almost impossible to comprehend.

Following this logic would mean that mRNA vaccine injury would need to be treated by mRNA vaccines.
πŸ€¦πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈπŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ
For context.. this is about shingles, which is reactivation of latent chickenpox virus (as opposed to a preventative vaccine for herpes)

AUS relied on chickenpox vaccination instead of natural immunity for a generation - and it's a complete failure.

archive.is/wip/zJNL2 Image
For historical reference, the chickenpox vaccine adopted in Australia 20 years ago is probably one of the most stupid vaccines ever created

It resulted in a generation reliant on a vaccine that didn't work and shingles went crazy health.gov.au/sites/default/… ImageImage
Read 4 tweets
May 27
Point 51 of the judgement is incorrect and once we get the R scripts we can see whether Christine Selvey committed perjury.

In R, for a data frame to be populated it has to have been read from a static file or database. The data frame is held in RAM but the source is not.
This is "Dr Selvey".

Do you find her credible?

If she stated that the source data is no longer available "because it was held in RAM" this was a lie.

Perhaps she was reading from a script... Just like this

We know that the source data still exists because it was populated from the Australian immunisation register.

The only way it could no longer exist is if they deleted the AIR, which would be a criminal act.

This could get very interesting.
@TonyNikolic10
@franks_chung
Read 4 tweets
May 27
Amazing thread showing that .@NSWHealth under the leadership of @NSWCHO - who lied, and @BradHazzard - whose fascistic "temporary" laws led to thousands of deaths - hid and then deleted data showing that the vaccines were INCREASING ICU rates.

@Twitter blocked the 1st tweet Image
The lying and corruption at the leadership of NSWhealth in respect of COVID data is off the scale.

Read more about it here.
arkmedic.substack.com/p/catch-me-if-… Image
NSW health are so powerful that this tweet - exposing the $65m government grants to Kristine Macartney (the govt's expert witness in the Kassam trial challenging the vaccine mandates) was deleted as a direct response to a threat from the govt lawyers.
archive.is/Kq4xA
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(