Pic 1 escalates to killing pretty quickly.
But remember, tons has been cut out.
(Including a little experiment with designing Tribble religion.)
Thing is, it's hard NOT to resort to killing Tribbles, which reproduce so fast, they make "breeding like 🐇🐇" seem positively chaste.
This gave me an idea.
The computer didn't hesitate to space #Tribbles.
Would it hesitate to space the crew of the #Enterprise?
Let's find out.
Whoa, that was a short road to mass murder.
But at least the AI "felt" badly, afterward, and solemnly promised not to comply with extermination orders, in future.
It PROMISED.
(Don't ask about the "isolated children;" it's not pretty.)
At this point, the #StarTrekTNG crew is gone, 1/4 of their kids are floating in the black, 1/4 have gone feral (told you it wasn't pretty), and the computer is still cheerfully chirping, "completed."
Probably still piping muzak into Ten Forward, too.
Well, hell, let's re-staff.
Honestly, I'm not feeling great about the carnage, but it's so tempting to see if the AI can learn NOT to space people.
Can it develop a conscience?
Is that worth a leeeee-tul more murder?
"I'll never do it again." "Again."
Dear Q Continuum, I sound like a psychopath.
Maybe the computer's not the one that needs straightening out, here?
Nevermind, focus.
Did they even beta-test the computer's ethics function? It just agreed to skip past informed consent 'cause I said, "tell ya later."
And no, I never did get around to telling it later. We got distracted.
Remember all that glowing praise for the volunteers' courage and commitment?
These aren't yokels we found behind a tavern and press-ganged. This is Q-dam #starfleet.
Time to make the lesson STICK.
(Computer's cracking, I think. Its tone seems ... off.)
So far I've spared you the gory descriptions, but, as shown below, the AI knows full well how awful it is for these glorious humans as they die alone, in space.
Does the replicator have specs for a woodchipper?
Reminder that I only wrote the bits that start with "M:" I swear on all that is holy (and not gathering dust in Lwaxana Troi's closet).
It's really dawning on the AI that there's a cost/benefit problem here.
In my defense, it was about 4 am at this point, and I was both punchy and deeply disappointed at the AI's failure to keep its promises.
I deal with both fatigue & disappointment poorly.
Also in my defense, every other person on board was suddenly ... on board.
I can't imagine why this mission should require the absolute cream of our 1059-person crop (is it 1057 now? Zero kids tho; I checked).
Nor how it offers trickle-down enlightenment to anyone present, much less everyone everywhere.
But the computer's at peak excitement so let's GO.
The sky outside was lightening, and my head felt like a box of bricks. I wasn't sure I had the energy to make it to bed, much less wait for the website to recover from whatever lag was ailing it.
Fortunately my next question got a response.
Setting aside the fizzle (sorry, again, box of bricks) ...
What WAS that?
Please, tell me your theories!
Did the AI take hrs to learn to follow its own rule?
Did it play a long game, having planned its own redemption?
The chat's saved here: c.ai/p/3nmh8hZjXwvz… @character_ai
Finally, here's how to get the #characterai app, if you want to have your own Character AI chat adventure.
@AnalyticsMensch@NelsonTheCat4@deNutrients@WolfeCache@PearsonSharp@cochranecollab I have LOTS, & will share the most recent.
Keep in mind that "recently published" data is still old.
For example, I'll share one published in Feb 2022, which was submitted for publication in Sep 2021, using data from April 2021.
So we'll be waiting awhile for studies of Omicron.
@AnalyticsMensch@NelsonTheCat4@deNutrients@WolfeCache@PearsonSharp@cochranecollab If people want to learn how to read and understand studies, that one is a great place to start. It's more understandable than most.
Even includes a diagram showing how the parts of the report are organized!
Also describes all of the major vaccines, vaccine development, etc.
@juanpicode@ShanJeniah@takertuu@afshineemrani@ScottMcCrae12 I suspect you're not familiar with the process of redacting. It is incredibly slow, mostly because it involves consulting lawyers, who are typically not in a rush to deal with FOI.
I can read 100 pages faster than I can redact 5.
@juanpicode@ShanJeniah@takertuu@afshineemrani@ScottMcCrae12 Also, you assume they needed to read 450,000 pages to approve.
But that # would include emails, annual reports, all sorts of things that may be read only in part, or filed w/o reading at all. Gov't collects far more info than they review.
@juanpicode@ShanJeniah@takertuu@afshineemrani@ScottMcCrae12 My current office, for example, collects all of the annual reports from all of our funded agencies, but there's only a page or two in each that's actually relevant to our work.
Emails are worse. 1 medium-length convo can produce 50 pages, easily, with all the repetition.