Post

More from @IamTheStory__

The Story Teller

@IamTheStory__

Jun 1

Gems of a Donkey called Markandey Katju 🧵

Though a donkey is always a butt of jokes but comparing a Donkey with Markandey Katju is an insult to Donkey itself!!

1. The insomniac

2. The Skirt Chaser

Read 26 tweets

The Story Teller

@IamTheStory__

May 29

Hindu Genocide - The Largest Ongoing holocaust in the history of mankind 🧵
🎭
Today Bollywood sold outs are showing solidarity for Rafah by posting banners on their SM handles, but same pimps never talked about Hindu genocide of the Bharat be it Mughals massacres, Moplah massacre, Noakhali Riots, Partition riots, 1971 Bangla Hindu genocide, 1990 Kashmiri Hindu genocide, Ram Mandir Kar Sevak genocide or Godhra carnage!!
🎭
Let's turn the pages of history to revice the gory memories of Hindu genocide which started 1500 years ago by Mohammad Bin Tughlaq's invasion of Sindh, and it is still going on!!

1. The onslaught

The genocide suffered by the Hindus and Sikhs of India at the hands of Arab, Turkish, Mughal and Afghan occupying forces for a period of 800 years is as yet formally unrecognised by the World.

The only similar genocide in the recent past was that of the Jewish people at the hands of the Nazis.

The holocaust of the Hindus in India was of even greater proportions, the only difference was that it continued for 800 years, till the brutal regimes were effectively overpowered in a life and death struggle by the Sikhs in the Punjab and the Hindu Maratha armies in other parts of India in the late 1700’s.

We have elaborate literary evidence of the World’s biggest holocaust from existing historical contemporary eyewitness accounts. The historians and biographers of the invading armies and subsequent rulers of India have left quite detailed records of the atrocities they committed in their day-to-day encounters with India’s Hindus.

2. The Scale

These contemporary records boasted about and glorified the crimes that were committed – and the genocide of tens of millions of Hindus, mass rapes of Hindu women and the destruction of thousands of ancient Hindu / Buddhist temples and libraries have been well documented and provide solid proof of the World’s biggest holocaust.

Dr. Koenraad Elst in his article “Was There an Islamic Genocide of Hindus?” states:
“There is no official estimate of the total death toll of Hindus at the hands of Islam. A first glance at important testimonies by Muslim chroniclers suggests that, over 13 centuries and a territory as vast as the Subcontinent, Muslim Holy Warriors easily killed more Hindus than the 6 million of the Holocaust. Ferishtha lists several occasions when the Bahmani sultans in central India (1347-1528) killed a hundred thousand Hindus, which they set as a minimum goal whenever they felt like punishing the Hindus; and they were only a third-rank provincial dynasty.

The biggest slaughters took place during the raids of Mahmud Ghaznavi (ca. 1000 CE); during the actual conquest of North India by Mohammed Ghori and his lieutenants (1192); and under the Delhi Sultanate (1206-1526).”
if you read the Muslim historian account of Chach Nama by Abu Bakr Kufi, you will see how Muslim invaders rejoiced and reveled in the massacres of the kafirs (Hindus) and desecration of their idols and temples for enforcing sheer iconoclast to stamp the authority of the Islam!!!

Read 24 tweets

The Story Teller

@IamTheStory__

May 26

Madonna Oriflamma - My Answer to trolls defending Rahul Gandhi and Sonia Gandhi 🧵
🎭
A lot of Congress Trolls like Muhammad Zubair are poking @vijaygajera and @MrSinha_ for showing the mirror to Rahul Gandhi by calling out his fraudulent Hindu beliefs claim while hanging a paiting from Nicholas Roerich lableed as "Madonna Oriflamma!!
🎭
Lets find out the truth of Madonna Oriflamma!!

1. Oriflamma or Oriflamme?

When you translate both Oriflamma and Oriflamme to Russian language, it is "Орифламма".
Now if you see the etymology of the word "Oriflamme", you would get some idea about its meaning and context of using this word.
Word Oriflamme/ Oriflamma means "Golden Flame".
It is also known as sacred banner of St. Denis, and oriflamble, from Old French orie flambe, from Latin aurea flamma "golden flame." It was ancient battle standard of the kings of France, it was supposed to have been of red or orange-red silk, with two or three points, and was given to the kings by the abbot of St. Denis on setting out to war. Cotgrave says it was "borne at first openely in warres made against Infidells, but afterwards used in all other warres and at length utterly lost in a Battell against the Flemings." It is last mentioned in an abbey inventory of 1534.

Oriflamme was 'raised', usually in the presence of the French king, at St-Denis. There are references to individual knights being designated to be protectors and bearers of the banner, but the more carefully supported works fall short of describing the banner actually being carried into the battle.

In next part we will see how Oriflamme/ Oriflamma was used as a divine Falg in the war by French Kings to ensure their victory!!!

2. The Battle Flag

The oriflamme was a sacred banner used by the kings of France in the Middle Ages in times of great danger. It was distinct from the heraldic banner of the French kings (semis of fleurs-de-lis on azure). Its history is fairly continuous from 1124 onward, when it was first mentioned. It was first described in 1225.

It consists of two parts: a gilded lance, to which is attached a silk banner, red with green fringes. The floating end of the banner splits into two or more trailing strips. The name, aurea flamma, conflates the banner (flamma) and the colour of the lance. The banner is sometimes represented as attached vertically to the lance, and sometimes (especially in the 19th century) as attached to a horizontal bar, itself suspended from the lance (modern rendition, St. Denis Basilica).

The oriflamme was deposited in the abbey of Saint-Denis, north of Paris, where kings of France were buried, next to the relics of Denis who evangelized the area. When going to war, the French king would come to Saint-Denis to "raise the banner". The oriflamme is depicted on miniatures representing the battles of Crecy and Poitiers (image).

The last time it was raised was in the late 15th century, during the conflict between Louis XI and the League of Public Weal in 1465, as represented on a miniature. The banner was destroyed during the French Revolution.

In the pic - Oriflamme was allegedly presented by Pope Leo III to Charlemagne, The first emperor of France and Western Europe. Charlemagne took Oriflamme to the Holy Lands to fulfill a prophecy that a knight carrying a holy relic would free the holy land!!

Read 19 tweets

The Story Teller

@IamTheStory__

May 17

Santan Symbols in the original constitution of Bharat🧵
Lately Rahul Gandhi has been busy telling people that if you elect Modi and BJP again they will destroy Constitution of India!!
Little did he know that our constitution if full of Sanatan symbols and icons of same Hindu Dharma whom he and his allies want to eradicate.
Let us give a knowledge upgrade to Rahul Gandhi and his illiterate Kabal.

1. Mohenjodaro Seals

2. Scene from Vedic Ashram/ Gurukul

Read 21 tweets

The Story Teller

@IamTheStory__

May 14

How Indira Gandhi's greed looted Rajput Royals during the emergency days 🧵

History is a great teacher to those who want to learn!!
Today Rajaputs of certain parts are raising the crescendo of dethroning Modi Ji by portraying him as anti-Rajput prime minister, so let's see how Congress treated Rajaputs during emergency!!

1. The Love story of Royal Lineage
Indira Devi of Baroda was considered one of the most beautiful women of her time. Born to Sayaji Rao Gaekwad III and his second wife Maharani Chimnabai in 1892, Indira Devi was a prize catch for any of India’s eligible royal bachelors.
Her parents agreed to an alliance with the State of Gwalior – one of India’s premiere royal households – with a 21-gun-salute, the ultimate act of acknowledgement from the British Empire. In 1911, however, when the 18-year-old Indira Devi was attending the Delhi Durbar, she fell head-over-Ferragamo-heels for Prince Jitendra of Cooch Behar. The younger brother of the Maharaja of Cooch Behar, Jitendra was a far cry from the Maharaja of Gwalior, Madho Rao Scindia.
Taking matters into her own hands, Indira then committed the gravest breech of royal protocol when she wrote a letter to Madho Rao Scinida, professing her love for Jitendra and requesting the Maharaja to dissolve their engagement.
Perturbed by their daughter’s brazen flaunting of rules and etiquette, the Maharaja of Baroda tried everything he could, even calling the Prince for a scolding, but to no avail. The couple were ultimately allowed to marry in London, without any member of their family in attendance.
This, only after the Maharaja of Baroda had received a letter from Madho Rao Scindia stating that he understood the situation and would not hold it against the Baroda family.
Once married, Indira Devi and Jitendra moved to Cooch Behar where, within a few months of the wedding, the Maharaja of Cooch Behar passed away, making Jitendra the ruler of the State and elevating Indira Devi to the position of Maharani.
The couple famously sired Gayatri Devi, who would go on to marry the Maharaja of Jaipur, and later become a force in her own right.

2. The marriage
In 1940 marriage of Maharani Gayatri Devi (Then Princess of Cooch Bihar Ayesha) was solemnized with Maharaja of Jaipur Sawai Man Singh II. Thus, begun the chapter of history which would be unique and full of intrigue.

Read 16 tweets

The Story Teller

@IamTheStory__

May 12

Nehru and his dystopian Legacy 🧵

Though volumes have been written to expose Nehru's socialist narcist way of thinking but still there are lesser-known truths which we shall explore to know that how much harm a dynasty did to Bharat and Sanatan Dharma!!
Nehru prospered a toxic political (dynastic and undemocratic), economic (socialistic), industrial (inefficient and burdensome public and state sector), agricultural (neglected and starved), geographic (most borders insecure), administrative (incompetent and corrupt babudom), historical
(Marxist and Leftist distortion), educational (elitist, and no universal literacy), and cultural (no pride in Indian heritage) legacy.

1. The transition

During the transition of governmental rule in Bharat just before the independence, interim govt was formed on 2nd Sept 1946. Nehru was made to sign a document admitting allegiance to the King of England and he did!!

2. The Third Person

Every communication sent from Nehru to the king of England till 26th January 1949 was supposed to be written in using his name as a "Third Person" pronoun as though officially the Union of India, Bharat was an independent dominion in the British Commonwealth of Nations existing between 15 August 1947 and 26 January 1950.

Read 23 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

The Story Teller

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @IamTheStory__

The Story Teller

The Story Teller

The Story Teller

The Story Teller

The Story Teller

The Story Teller

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!