Fresh from the fraud of portraying the now disgraced #ChisquaredKyle Sheldrick as a "statistician" in a provably false and defamatory article, @medpagetoday are now found to have outed themselves as a purveyor...
Of Mutton.
"Aspiring medical student" = not even a med student
If you are a health professional who administered or prescribed (i.e. ordered for administration) a fourther or higher dose of #Comirnaty to a person you did this off label.
This document was revised in February 2023, by which time fourth, fifth and sixth doses had been given to patients without their consent or knowledge that they were being given off-label.
And, despite the protestations of @thesassymicrobe - who not only wrote extensively of having suffered this distressing problem - but vehemently denied it was an adverse effect of COVID "vaccination"...
Here you are. Jen Gunter decided to be a celebrity doctor after a 5 year OBGYN training program. She's a generalist who spends her time at the home of vaccines - Kaiser Permanente
One of the products of psy-op central, McMaster. @andy_park
The link doesn't exist because the story is false. Every claim in a tweet should be referenced in a way that the reader can verify it themselves. This is the way we work.
Even after 3 further tweets. No links. No references. No verifiable sites.
It is clearly not opinion because each tweet refers to a document or site, yet that document or site is not linked.
Bear in mind also that it was @MicrobiomDigest who persecuted Didier Raoult over his 2020 #Hydroxychloroquine paper which was a rapid review for obvious reasons.
Yet she completely ignored the @NEJM's impossibly rapid acceptance of the Pfizer vaccine paper
🧵
Remember that this study was published on the 10th December 2020 - the same day as the FDA VRBPAC submission, so it was IMPOSSIBLE to have been adequately peer reviewed.
It was a 44,000 patient study. Proper peer review should take weeks.
Worse still, the data cut off (the last patient data collection) for the study was 14th November.
The COI declarations - which are usually sent in when the paper is *accepted* (rather than submitted for peer review) were dated 1st December.
As of today, @medpagetoday and @KristinaMFiore are the only entities continuing the defamatory statements reporting on Sheldrick's original claim which he has now fully retracted.
If this was my son I wouldn't be posting pictures on twitter pretending everything was OK. I would be at the football club asking who had authorised the prescription of a therapy that was known to cause myocarditis and should never have been given.