In this 2020 episode of the excellent podcast Social Science Bites - @socscispace - brilliant Sociolinguist, Professor Ruth Wodak, discusses the rise of far-right populism across Europe, & more importantly, what we might do about it.
Depending on your views, far-right populism can represent a welcome return to the past , or a worrying one. The former, Wodak argues, is one of the hallmarks of far-right populism – a yearning for an often mythical past where the “true people” were ascendant and comfortable.
Wodak terms this blurred look backward #retrotopia, “a nostalgia for a past where everything was much better,” whether it was ever real or not.
Wodak, who to be clear finds herself worrying and not welcoming, offers host David Edmonds a recipe for becoming a far-right populist.
In her scholarship, she’s identified four ingredients, or dimensions, to the ideology that often underlie populist far-right parties.
The most apparent from the outside is a strong national chauvinism or even nativism.
This nativism is very exclusive to a specific set of insiders, who focus on creating “an anti-pluralist country, a country which is allegedly homogeneous, which has one kind of people who all speak the same language, have the same culture, or look the same.”
“[Having] this imaginary ‘true people’ is very important” - is very, very important.
Far-right populists decide who belongs and who does not belong to the ‘true people.’”
And just as important is then having a group of outsiders to cast as #scapegoats responsible for major problems – making for “an easy narrative for very complex issues.”
It’s probably no surprise, then, that “conspiracy theories are part and parcel of the far-right agenda. They are very supportive in constructing who is to blame, etc., for all the complex problems.”
Another ingredient is anti-elitism that targets elites or ‘the establishment’ ie managers, teachers, journalists, intellectuals, liberals or your political opponents - “all the people who allegedly don’t listen to ‘us’ & who have very different interests from ‘the true people’.”
Next comes a focus on law and order (“an agenda of protecting this true people”) enforced through a hierarchal party structure. This top-down structure frequently focuses on a charismatic leader who encapsulates the spirit of the ‘true people’ – and rejects the ‘other.’
“Along with the scapegoat,” Wodak explains, “comes ‘the topos of the saviour’… the leader who will save the true American or the true Austrian or the true British people from those all dangers, they will ‘solve’ the problems, protect the people, and they promise hope.”
The final standard ingredient is endorsing conservative values and perceived cultural touchstones, such as Christianity in Europe.
This recipe matters, of course, thanks to the rise of far-right populist politics across the Americas, Europe and Asia.
Wodak herself is Austrian – she’s professor in linguistics at the University of Vienna and emeritus distinguished professor and chair in Discourse Studies at Lancaster University – has seen plenty of recent natural experiments in populism throughout continental Europe.
She cites several reasons for the popularity of far-right populism, including the end of the Cold War and the resultant increase in migration from Eastern Europe into the West.
Those migrants, previously seen as refugees from communism who were welcomed and even feted, morphed into unwelcome and fear-inducing interlopers (and despite being white and from Christian cultures).
Around the same time, neoliberal policies changed labour policies in the West, creating inequalities that the right could build on – just as they did in the pro-business responses to the global financial crisis of 2008 (“saving the banks instead of the people”) and globalization.
In this podcast, Wodak also discusses how right-wing populism makes use of social media, how exploiting “otherness” helps roll over self-interest, what the role of a social scientist is in exploring fraught ideologies, and how we might counteract malign politics.
Wodak has studied right-wing discourse for years, work that is covered in 2015 book The Politics of Fear: What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean.
Insisting that 4 asylum seekers share a single room is dangerous & cruel.
If you want to observe hateful cowardly anonymous pig-ignorant shit-stirring far-right troll accounts egged on by Richard Tice & the right-wing press & "news" media, just search for #Pimlico. 🇬🇧
40 asylum seekers staged a protest in Pimlico when they were asked to bunk "four to a room".
Westminster Council leader Adam Hug has written to Braverman demanding to know why the town hall was not informed the vulnerable group of asylum seekers had been moved to Westminster.
"Our teams have been aware of this issue since the early hours of Thursday... & continued to offer whatever support we can. We have been in constant contact with Home Office officials & despite reassurances that the issue has been resolved, that does not appear to be the case.”
Today's More or Less on @BBCRadio4 includes a good section on the latest net migration figures, with the kind of important context that partisan politicians, newspapers, columnists, shock jocks & broadcast "news" channels invariably leave out.
'Net migration' is the figure which includes all the people entering Britain who intend to stay for at least twelve months, minus all the people leaving - currently at 606,000 people.
The @Conservatives' manifesto in 2010 was to get net migration down to "tens of thousands".
The 606,000 figure is about twice as high as it was in 2019, before the pandemic. Brexit was in no small part about 'taking back control' of our borders & there are fewer people coming from the EU than in 2019, & a reasonable number from the EU are leaving.
Right now, as the government’s illegal migration bill journeys through parliament, there are children fleeing torture and persecution in Iran and Afghanistan, enforced conscription in Eritrea and gunfire and air strikes in Syria and Sudan.
Heartbreakingly, most will never have known a life without violence and fear. Yet they leave in the hope of finding somewhere they can feel safe. But the UK doesn’t want to offer them sanctuary anymore.
Ever since the long-time Federalist Society leader helped create a conservative supermajority on the Supreme Court, & then received more than a billion dollars to disburse to conservative causes, Leo’s next moves had been the subject of speculation.
Leo declared in a slick video to potential donors, he planned to “crush liberal dominance” across American life. The country was plagued by “woke-ism” in corporations & education, “one-sided journalism” & “entertainment that’s really corrupting our youth.” vimeo.com/806310279?embe…
The reason for this racial disparity still isn’t fully understood. It’s likely due to a combination of many factors, including socioeconomic status and pre-existing health conditions. committees.parliament.uk/publications/3…
Numerous reports have also shown that black women receive poorer maternity care compared with women from other ethnic backgrounds, which may further contribute to poorer health outcomes.
"We believe more than ever that climate change is an investment risk," Blackrock CEO Larry Fink told CNBC in 2020. "And we are seeing that through our clients. And how our clients are allocating capital."
Predictably, the free-market Right have not taken this well...
Much of this battle is about fossil fuels and whether investments should keep plowing into coal, oil and gas. Many money managers think climate change makes certain investments risky. For example, investing in real estate where sea levels are rising.
Fink sees this as capitalism responding to a changing world, but to critics, these are bleeding-heart liberals who want to change the world. And conservative activists are pushing hard to ban this investment strategy.