NEW: My latest @VanityFair special report tells the inside story of a skirmish over early #SARSCoV2 data from Wuhan market bet. 2 leading scientific teams: China & international. China's former CDC director George Gao spoke extensively w/ vanityfair.com/news/2023/06/r… /1
@VanityFair, sharing some of most extended remarks to a Western media outlet since the pandemic’s onset. He says #COVID19's origin remains unknown and no possibility, including lab leak, can be ruled out: “I think everything's possible." /2
Gao says the fraught origins-debate politics are thwarting answers: “Once the scientists can do free science, we might get the answer. But now, everything is politicized.” I interviewed 50 people for this story, and obtained numerous new emails, texts + other records. /3
Gao says he told @MichaelWorobey + @edwardcholmes on phone calls, “‘My analysis w/ my colleagues has no evidence it’s raccoon dogs’... They didn't believe me." Worobey says Gao’s claim “doesn’t match our phone call at all” and Gao would not collaborate. /4
On May 5, @WHO SAGO convened a meeting to referee the different analyses between Gao's team, a team co-led by @MichaelWorobey and @jbloom_lab, @VanityFair is first reporting. "The foundation of science is collaboration," @mvankerkhove says. /5
A talented @VanityFair team devoted many hours/much effort to this story. Grateful to my ace editor @mike_hogan, the peerless @radhikajones, our legal eagle @KeeganTerence + Dale Brauner for her scrupulous fact check. And special thx to @Katherineli_ for her addt'l reporting.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A Florida statewide grand jury launched by DeSantis is now investigating whether @moderna_tx and @pfizer made false claims for profit about the efficacy of #COVID19 vaccines. It will report results in Jan. 2024, potentially in time to influence GOP primary voters. /2
“The worst-case scenario is if it becomes a litmus test in the [presidential] primary,” says @SaadOmer3. “Then all bets are off.” New data from @SurgoVentures shows the deep influence of anti-vax sentiment in GOP base. /3
Today, a @WSJ story disclosed that US Dep't of Energy has concluded #COVID19 "most likely arose" from a lab leak, citing classified intel recently provided to @WhiteHouse and key congress members. Some thoughts on where this revelation leaves us: 🧵👇 wsj.com/articles/covid… /1
It does not mean #COVID19 necessarily came from a Wuhan lab. Rather, it underscores the need for ongoing investigation into an open question: did #COVID19 spill over from an infected animal at a Wuhan market, or result from an accidental lab leak? @WHO has long been clear: /2
Both hypotheses remain possible. Any claim that the question is settled, in either direction, is untrue. But as I first reported for @VanityFair back in June 2021, Qs about a lab leak were sidelined early on inside the US gov't: vanityfair.com/news/2021/06/t… /3
EXCLUSIVE: @VanityFair/@ProPublica special report from inside Senate #COVID19 origins investigation. @jeffykao + I got 100s of pages of Senate research findings, 500+ documents from inside Wuhan Institute of Virology, consulted CCP experts: vanityfair.com/news/2022/10/c… 🧵👇 /1
Our 5-month investigation offers most detailed picture of critical months before #COVID19 outbreak: intense scientific pressure at WIV, mounting safety issues, undisclosed documents referencing Nov. 2019 biosafety incident there. Same story, also here: propublica.org/article/senate… /2
.@GOPHELP released its report on COVID origins yesterday: bit.ly/3fh4LpC. Only 35 pgs., it concludes SARS-CoV-2 “more likely than not" came from research incident. The report omitted a 236-page analysis from @StateDept analyst who unearthed explosive WIV docs. /3
The documents - most predate pandemic - shed light on the world @EcoHealthNYC operated in: one of murky grant agreements, flimsy NIH oversight and pursuit of gov't grants by pitching increasingly risky global research. /2
For years, @EcoHealthNYC cultivated gov't officials at @cosmos_dc cocktail events, where EcoHealth pres. @peterdaszak worked to share podium w/ Fauci. "Cultivation events" were "great way to increase our visibility to federal funders," Daszak told his board. /3
Breaking: Pleased to share my @VanityFair special report on @WhiteHouse deliberations over #COVID19 rapid testing. In an October 22 meeting, the administration got a detailed 10-pg plan to ramp up rapid testing to "prevent holiday COVID surge." vanityfair.com/news/2021/12/t… /1
Central to that plan, presented by @TheCOVIDCollab, @RockefellerFdn + others, was a "Bold Plan for Impact," namely: "Every American Household To Receive Free Rapid Tests for the Holidays/New Year." /2
The @WHCOVIDResponse rejected the idea as impossible to scale, given the limited manufacturing capacity at that time, and opted for "small ball" initiatives instead, @StevenCOVIDdoc, who was at the Oct. 22 meeting told me. /3
In July hearing, Fauci denied to @SenRandPaul such research took place: "I totally resent the lie you are propagating." @NIH spokesperson tells me Fauci had been "entirely truthful," and had not yet seen @EcoHealthNYC report spelling out that research. /2
Yet @EcoHealthNYC says it sent research data to @NIH in 2018. Pointing to reporting "irregularities," @DavidRelman tells me this is "another chapter in a sad tale of inadequate oversight, disregard for risk, and insensitivity to the importance of transparency." /3