We do not know who 0x711CD is to this day, but the Liquity community is forever grateful to him.
He remains active as of 28 days ago, so it was about due time to share his story.
So what happened there?
It's all about the @CurveFinance $LUSD / $3CRV ($USDC, $USDT & $DAI) pool:
Home of about $24M worth of liquidity, increasingly more balanced, but that's another story.
Let's look at the LP token holders:
See Ebakus Token Contract, with 47% of the supply? More than deposited in the @ConvexFinance vault & @iearnfinance vault, the second and third entries.
Let's start with the best news: the LP tokens sent there are essentially... burned 🔥
So what happened there?
- Zooming in on 0x711CD's interactions with LUSD/3crv contract, we can see he was a large LUSD LP who even used @ConvexFinance, up to Sep 18, 2021.
Then, he withdraw all assets & sent them the Ebakus token contract.
Here's Chad 0x711CD's sending ~11M LP tokens, about ~$11.3M worth, to the Ebakus token contract:
The error likely stems from a too-hasty copy/paste, but your guesses are as good as ours!
At the end of the day, what mattered was assessing whether or not the LP tokens could be withdrawn:
Luckily, the EBK token contract is pretty simple, with a limited number of functions... and none including anything related to sweeping funds accidentally sent to the contract 🥳
Meaning that 11M LP token / currently roughly 47% of the whole LUSD/3CRV pool ownership has been forever burned 🔥
It seems pretty comfy for the LUSD LPs who harness the @CurveFinance gauge or @ConvexFinance, as the alpha whale will never dilute their rewards!
It's also reassuring to know that whatever happens, even if ALL of $LUSD @CurveFinance LPs were to withdraw from the pool, there will still be the $11.3M from Chad 0x711CD to maintain a solid baseline of liquidity.
0x711CD further diversified $LUSD POL, just like @ChickenBonds
--- 2. Redemption Shenanigans ---
@Tetranode is an avid user since the early days, quickly joined the Discord, and shared the love around on CT. 🙏
We even have a TetraChungus chilling at the office! Courtesy of @TokenBrice, who apparently owns "way too many".
Tetra is a power user of the protocol, but like most of Liquity's tinkerers, it was an iterative process.
Indeed, there could be a bit of a learning curve for Liquity, especially when it comes to unprecedented functions back then, such as Redemptions.
At Liquity's launch, the spirits were also vastly different: Liquity was smashing TVL thresholds with an ETH on a meteoric rise.
Our story happened a few months after, back in October 2021. Tetra was hungry for leverage to further capitalize on the ETH dynamism.
Looking to leverage his Trove, Tetra harnessed the Redemption function, enabling the conversion of LUSD to ETH against the least collateralized Troves of the protocol... the bulk of which was Tetra's.
Who else than @Tetranode could be worthy of redeeming himself?
Because of the baseFee mechanism, here to protect the protocol against quick LUSD supply spikes/shrinks - Tetra paid an increasing fee, leading to a nice payout to LQTY stakers: about $5M
He'd have achieved better pricing using LUSD's DEX liquidity
His deed will forever be remembered as the biggest redemption event, with millions of $LUSD redeemed on that day.
Immutability can sometimes give a positive twist to a mistake, as seen with 0x711CD, who will now be forever part of @LiquityProtocol, as the top supplier, potentially ever, of LUSD/3crv @CurveFinance POL
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
- Depositing LUSD into the Stability Pool
- Frontend operators that earn a 'kickback rate' from stability pool deposits ✅
Anon, can you remind me what the stability pool is? 🤔
2/ The Stability Pool is the liquidation mechanism of Liquity
Liquidation gains (in ETH) & rewards (in LQTY) are distributed to users who deposit LUSD in the Stability Pool as a compensation for upholding the liquidation mechanism of the protocol
A 🧵 on how the LQTY token works, and how stakers can earn yield in two of the most unstoppable tokens around:
- LUSD 💵
- ETH 🦇🔊
A quick refresher 👇 🧵
Stakers of LQTY can earn fees generated on two fronts:
Loan issuance (paid out in LUSD)
Redemptions (paid out in ETH)
So how come the sudden huge spike in yield for stakers this week?
👇
An independent whale minted $52m LUSD across multiple transactions, resulting in 270k LUSD being generated in loan fees for the protocol (aka LQTY stakers 💸 )
The 🐋 also sold some of their LUSD to ETH, causing some redemptions to take place, which further added ETH rewards 🤑
The @Balancer governance just approved the addition of $BAL rewards to the "Trinity" pool - $LUSD / $wETH / $LQTY - gauge
🙏 Thanks, to the ballers for their support: looking forward to the next steps!
It's an essential part of LUSD's liquidity strategy, a quick thread👇️
1/7
So far, the main liquidity source for $LUSD is @CurveFinance LUSD/3CRV pool, a staple to sustain stablecoins' liquidity
However, with LUSD's premium, the stableswap formula is not as efficient as it could be
Having x*y=k type LUSD liquidity can help improve the situation
2/7
Indeed, x*y=k and its variant maximize liquidity availability, which helps to ensure a baseline $LUSD liquidity is secured, no matter what happens on the markets, even on days where liquidity needs are intense, such as when the $ETH price is depreciating.
3/7
With LUSD being above peg at $1.03, what does this mean? 💡
It becomes all the more interesting for DAOs that have large ETH treasuries 🧵
When LUSD is at $1.00 Liquity's maximum leverage ratio for users longing ETH is 11x (110% min LTV).
At the current price of 1.03, it makes the maximum leverage ratio increase to 15.72x - meaning that you can leverage up an extra 4.72x at no extra liquidation risk!
The higher the $LUSD price is, the more attractive it becomes for Trove owners who are long ETH to scale up their position 🧠
Along with leveraging up on their ETH, users can:
1) Pocket the premium & sell their $LUSD 2) Take their $LUSD and enter the game of @ChickenBonds !