ACOs, risk bearing physician groups that contract with payers, are fundamentally incompatible with the goals of single payer health care. ACOs utilize payment models that literally pit a doctor’s and patient’s interests against each other.
These payment models reward the participants of these ACOs for spending less on care, even when more is needed. They don’t belong in a single payer system, which is why #CalCare prohibits any entity other than the single payer from assuming risk via payment contract
Contrary to what some people say, you don’t need risk bearing entities to do care coordination, and I really wish these people would stop saying there is room in single payer systems for this type of middleman. #CalCare principle #7: patient care based on patient need.
That means the foremost consideration should be patient health. Payment models and risk bearing entities turn the relationship between patient and doctor to one of economics, not one of healing. Fundamentally incompatible with making health care a human right
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
THREAD on distinctions between the phrases "#unifiedfinancing" and #singlepayer, in the context of #CalCare and #SB770. TL;DR, the phrase "unified financing" is the new "access to coverage" and we need to dispense with it for good 👇👇👇
1) I have some thoughts about the phrases "#unifiedfinancing" and "#singlepayer." Some people use them interchangeably, but they should not. They are distinct, and those differences really matter.
2) "#singlepayer" is a specific policy. It is a health care system where payment for all essential health services are delivered by one entity, one single payer, for a given population. There are no middlemen, no insurance companies, no ACOs, just one single, public plan