On 9 March 2023, I requested all correspondence between the Department of Health and Aged Care #Australia , Facebook and Twitter regarding Dept. request(s) for Facebook posts/groups and Tweets to be removed or flagged from 1 Jan 2021 - 1 March 2023.
FOI 4293 - A 🧵
PART - 1/3
Department of Health and Aged Care, #Australia Social Media unit reached out to Facebook querying if Facebook group "United Collective" infringed its policy (spreading misinformation) and as a result if it can be shut down?
Following this, Facebook advised that they reviewed and deleted 9 piece of content for violation of their policies.
Facebook also advised Dept. of Health #Australia to keep an eye on post(s) which might be violating their policy and report them to Facebook for review.
Dept. of Health #Australia "thought" this Facebook group's aim is to breach Facebook's COVID misinformation policy and is against the COVID information (mainstream), why Facebook is not removing the group?
Facebook advised that large volume of content does not violate policy.
Correspondence between Facebook and Dept. of Health #Australia show discussion about "demoting".
CNET in October 2021 published that Facebook
will demote content posted in Groups making potentially problematic content harder for others to find.
Dept. of Health reached out to Facebook
flagging a group where members shared their #COVID19 vaccine reactions and a group on Instagram.
Facebook took the group down (policy violation).
FB group name - australiancovidvaccinereactions
Instgaram group - ourvociematters_official
Dept. of Health #Australia reached out to Facebook about an antivax Facebook group and advised that they are using Dept. branding as photo) to make it more legit.
Facebook advised Dept. of Health to lodge a IP complaint.
Facebook took the down the group.
Dept. of Health #Australia flagged (context- harassment) with Facebook a post which encouraged people to contact the TGA via phone or email from .@NationFirstAust who they alleged is a known political anti-vaxxer.
Facebook advised it did not violated their policies.
Dept. of Health Australia has updated their Guidance on Myocarditis and Pericarditis after COVID-19 vaccines on 12 January 2024.
Here are some interesting points 👇🏽
#Australia
#CovidVaccines
In the guidance published on 9 Nov 2022, they said that a small number of cases of have been reported in the clinical trial and in Australia. Now, they are saying that Myocarditis and/or pericarditis can occur after Novavax at a similar rate to the mRNA vaccine.
Myocarditis - 4 in every 100K doses.
Pericarditis - 13 in every 100K doses.
The Office of Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR), which is part of Dept. of health #Australia is crying 'misinformation' because .@SenatorRennick & .@Jikkyleaks called them out on their BS on mRNA vaccines and 'transfection'.
Those who are not aware, please refer to this iconic thread shared by .@Jikkyleaks where .@SenatorRennick questioned Dr Raj Bhula who is the current Regulator (OGTR) and has over 20 years’ experience in the regulation of pesticides in Australia.
Their statement reads:
'transfect' - It 'may' also mean ‘enter into the cell’s
nucleus to stably integrate in the genome’. This is a meaning that DOES NOT apply to the two mRNA vaccine.
How can they say it, as @Jikkyleaks pointed out so rightly 👇🏽
The notes from the Australian senate committee supplementary budget estimates 2021- 2022 on #Ivermectin are stunning.
A 🧵
#Ivermectin
#Australia
One of the key reason to restrict prescribing #Ivermectin was that people would have taken ivermectin to treat or prevent COVID-19 infection rather than getting vaccinated.
#Australia
Did you know that the decision to restrict prescribing of #ivermectin was not open to public consultation.
The risk they are highlighting which is spreading of COVID-19 in the community.
Please note that that COVID-19 vaccine never prevented transmission.
In late 2022, as part of the process of should the restriction on #Ivermectin be lifted in Australia, The NSW Poisons Information centre (NSW PIC) in their submission to the TGA advised that they were not in favor.
#Ivermectin
#Australia
This is because since restriction was applied, they had 35 calls regarding exposures to ivermectin which was being inappropriately used for Covid treatment or prevention.
#Ivermectin
#Australia
How the use of vet products indicated the restrictions (of ivermectin) in prescribing working?
The restriction forced people to obtain #Ivermectin illegally or to use ivermectin manufactured for animals. The prohibition produced the opposite desired impact.
In Jan 2021, when TGA "Provisionally" approved ASTRAZENECA COVID-19 vaccine, they knew the following:-
1. Bio-distribution study was pending. 2. Vaccine long term immunity was a concern & not assessed. 3. Booster didn't provide better protection. https://t.co/DEKZ6Uusuqtwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
4. Did you know there were concerns for Anti-ChAd vector antibodies due to repeat vaccination?
On 9 Feb 2022, TGA #Australia provisionally approved AstraZeneca's COVID-19 vaccine as booster dose.
6. This report was authorized on 28 Jan 2021.
They knew that Antibodies generally declined quickly over 2 weeks after the booster dose and yet on 9 Feb 2022 (an year later), TGA "provisionally" approved AstraZeneca's COVID-19 vaccine as booster dose.
This email exchange from January 2021 b/w Prof. Allen Cheng (ATAGI Voting member) and Prof. Paul Kelly (Australia Chief Medical Officer) is intriguing.
“Why would we use a vaccine that mightn't prevent transmission?"
🤡👉🏽🌏
I am quite not sure what "herd immunity" Prof. Cheng is talking about with COVID-19 vaccines as these vaccines do no prevent one from contracting it and does not prevent trasmission.
#Australia
Professor Paul Kelly's responded advising to add - "This is not the end of the vaccine story, it’s the beginning. We don’t know how long protection will last for any of the vaccine candidates, so we may need to revaccinate"