Post

twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

@Akevot

More from @EpshtainItay

Itay Epshtain

@EpshtainItay

Sep 15

1/3 While the suspension of privileges or expulsion of #Israel from @UN membership is contingent on action by the Security Council (and subject to the veto power of its permanent members), there is an underlying condition to Israel's membership. One that must be invoked.

2/3 Former @CIJ_ICJ President Salam noted in the 2024 Advisory Opinion that “resolution [181] forms a whole, whose terms must be read together and inseparably. In other words, neither Israel nor Palestine can claim to derive rights from the resolution while rejecting or ignoring the rights of the other party enshrined in the same text.” Thus, he concluded, “having undertaken to implement resolution 181, Israel is under a legal obligation not to hinder the exercise of the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination, or to oppose the proclamation of a Palestinian State by the representatives of the Palestinian people, and indeed it cannot do so without undermining its own rights, the existence of the two States being inextricably linked in the same legal instrument.”

2/3 bis. By suppressing the political independence and territorial integrity of #Palestine, #Israel is undercutting the basis of its admission to the @UN, and its duty to comply with the decisions of the Security Council according to Article 25 of the Charter. In May 1949, when it admitted Israel as a Member State of the United Nations, the General Assembly recalled resolution 181 and took note of Israel’s declarations “in respect of the implementation of the said resolution.”

Read 6 tweets

Itay Epshtain

@EpshtainItay

Sep 2

Too often we hear that #Israel's pending announcement of annexation of occupied Palestinian territory, in whole or in part, is the inadvertent result of recognition of the State of #Palestine, an initiative led by @KSAmofaEN and @francediplo_EN, and perhaps best avoided. Nothing is further from the truth, Here are the temporal and substantive arguments:

1/3 On 28 December 2022, #Israel’s 37th Government was formed on the basis of a policy platform (enshrined as law), declaring that “the Jewish people has an inalienable right to the land of Israel. Following from the belief, the Prime Minister will formulate and promote a policy to apply sovereignty to Judea and Samaria, identifying the timing of which, according to Israeli national and international interests.”
Well before @NorwayMFA , @SpainMFA , @IrelandMFA_RBLX , and @MZEZ_RS recognized the State of #Palestine, and the @FCDOGovUK and @BelgiumMFA announced a similar intention, Israel decided to permanently acquire the West Bank, to the detriment of the Palestinian right of self-determination.
This has always been the plan, and the timing reflects Israel’s rejection of international law, not its upholding by third states.

2/3 In its 2024 Advisory Opinion, the International Court of Justice @CIJ_ICJ noted that all forms of annexation are equally prohibited, amounting to an act of aggression—the acquisition of territory by the threat or use of force —and concluded that Israel's presence in the oPt is unlawful.

The Court concluded in July of last year that the ”violations by Israel of the prohibition of the acquisition of territory by force and of the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination have a direct impact on the legality of the continued presence of Israel, as an occupying Power, in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. The sustained abuse by Israel of its position as an occupying Power, through annexation and an assertion of permanent control over the Occupied Palestinian Territory and continued frustration of the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination, violates fundamental principles of international law and renders Israel’s presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory unlawful.”
Short of unconditionally and rapidly withdrawing its unlawful presence, nothing Israel does now would change the fact that it is committing an internationally wrongful act.
The legal maxim actus legis nemini facit injurium ("the act of the law does injury to no one") best describes the decision to recognize Palestine. No harm comes from it (and yet, harm was already caused by Israel).

Read 5 tweets

Itay Epshtain

@EpshtainItay

Sep 1

In a statement issued last month, #Israel’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs @IsraelMFA made two of its tired and erroneous legal claims to the occupied #Palestinian territory of the West Bank and #Gaza (as was parroted by the ‘GREAT Trust’ exposed by @washingtonpost @catebrown12): The Uti Possidetis Doctrine and the Missing Reversioner Doctrine. Both were rejected by the International Court of Justice 2024 Advisory Opinion, as I will show in this thread:

1/6 In the context of international law, uti possidetis initially described the situation on the ground after an armed conflict, and the right to territory acquired through conflict. This notion of uti possidetis is no longer admissible since the established peremptory norm on aggression precludes the use of force for any acquisition of territory. Nevertheless, Israel knowingly bases itself on antiquated law.
The @CIJ_ICJ noted that following WWI, the territorial boundaries of Mandatory Palestine were laid down by various instruments. However, in November 1947, the UN General Assembly adopted Resolution 181, which included a “Plan of Partition” for the territory between two independent States, one Arab and the other Jewish, as well as the creation of a special international regime for the City of Jerusalem.

2/6 In reverting to uti possidetis and rejecting Resolution 181, Israel is undercutting the basis of its admission to the @UN, and its duty to comply with the decisions of the Security Council according to Article 25 of the Charter. In May 1949, when it admitted Israel as a Member State of the United Nations, the General Assembly recalled resolution 181 and took note of Israel’s declarations “in respect of the implementation of the said resolution.” Moreover, in November 1967, the Security Council unanimously adopted Resolution 242, which “emphasized the inadmissibility of acquisition of territory by war” and called for the “withdrawal of Israel armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict.”

Read 7 tweets

Itay Epshtain

@EpshtainItay

Aug 31

BREAKING: The #Gaza Reconstruction Acceleration and Transformation Trust (GREAT), exposed by @washingtonpost, is the twisted brainchild of @BCG, commissioned by @POTUS and @SecRubio to design a great breach of peremptory norms of international law. A short thread:

1/4 The @UN International Law Commission codified in 2022 the peremptory norms of international law (jus cogens), from which no derogation is permitted, to include the prohibition of aggression and genocide, the basic rules of IHL, and the right of self-determination of peoples. The 'GREAT' aims to systemically breach these sacrosanct norms.

@UN 2/4 The foremost aim of 'GREAT' is the the acquisition of Gaza's territory by the use of force - by Israel and the US as co-conspirators - and the suppression of Palestinian political independence and territorial integrity.

Read 9 tweets

Itay Epshtain

@EpshtainItay

Aug 26

1/3 This is Amichai Chikli, a blatant racist who serves as #Israel's Minister of 'Diaspora Affairs and Combating Antisemitism.' In a bid for political relevance - competing with other bigoted politicians who promote atrocities against #Palestinians - he set out to eradicate impartial humanitarian relief.

2/3 Come September 9, Chikli - according to his recent admission - will exclude independent and impartial humanitarian organizations from providing aid to Palestinians in dire need in the West Bank and #Gaza. Those who are allowed to stay and deliver would do so under condition of subservience to Israel's whims and illicit acts of forcible transfer, deportation and annexation. These are the "security, laws, and foreign policy" considerations espoused by Chikli.

3/3 Chikli - on behalf of Israel's government - rejectes the absolute duty of an Occupying Power to agree - on behalf of and in the interest of occupied peoples - offers of humanitarian relief made by impartial humanitarian organizations, and the corollary duty to facilitate their presence and activities. In other words, Israel has no latitude to refuse organizations on capricious, arbitrary or unlawful grounds.

Read 4 tweets

Itay Epshtain

@EpshtainItay

Aug 6

#Israel is set to expand its #Gaza offensive, in what amounts to 'Debellatio.' A short thread on the supreme international crime:
1/3 war of debilitation is characterized by the unlawful intent and attempt to bring the complete destruction and disintegration of all public life and institutions.

2/3 Debellatio was a legal construct during a period when States were free to wage war for territorial gain. However, in contemporary international law, that would be an act of aggression.

3/3 The concept of 'debellatio,' including the complete and total defeat of an adversary, and the taking of "spoils of war" (the territory and sovereignty of the vanquished belligerent) has been outlawed. Time we call #Israel's war in #Gaza what it is - a crime of #aggression.

Read 4 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

Itay Epshtain

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @EpshtainItay

Itay Epshtain

Itay Epshtain

Itay Epshtain

Itay Epshtain

Itay Epshtain

Itay Epshtain

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!